Posted on 08/08/2008 11:57:31 AM PDT by JennysCool
So does this now increase his chances of being appointed Obama’s Attorney General?
Huh. Why the modified limited hangout, I wonder....
No, to put it to rest I’ll bet he wrote a check and forced her to sign a piece of paper.
Maybe the National Enquirer should run with the Obama certifigate scandal....
She's the whore not him!
It certainly seems worth waiting up for! :-)
Hope all’s well. By the way, your tagline these days is one of my favorite Dire Straits tunes!
Knew this would “break” soon.
Edwards. Take the Paternity Test.
Kerry, sign and release the Form 180. That should do it for the un-dynamic duo of 2004.
Yeah, really. If the kid isn't yours, why go visit the mother and kid in the wee hours of the morning at a hotel you're not even registered at.
And to think this is the son of a mill worker!
I wouldn’t count on the MSM being embarrassed by their pathetic NON-coverage of this issue. In fact, I fully expect to see the following headlines in the next few days:
EDWARDS ADMITS AFFAIR; GOP NOT READY TO FORGIVE
JOHN EDWARDS: MAN WITH NOBLE FLAW
ELIZABETH EDWARDS STANDS BY HER MAN
and last, but not least—
EDWARDS AFFAIR; BUSH’S FAULT
Follow the money.
Yeah, can you see her having to tell her child “I know Daddy denied you were his, but it was for his political career. You understand, don’t you darling?”
That is the truth. A sad state of journalism when the National Enquirer has more credibility than the dinosaur media? Just damn.
What a pantload. Why would his "friends" do such a thing if the child were not his...? Those are some friends to step up like that. We're supposed to believe their motives in providing money was purely alturistic...? This house of cards is only getting taller and will be a further distraction to the Dems. Fine by me.
I wanted to say “slut,” but I thought I would leave that up to a woman...you’ve opened the door, ang.
No kidding. It's bad enough he outright admits that she's a homewrecker..next he says she's a slutty homewrecker. If I was Reille I'd be pretty ticked off.
Funny but true right? :)
John’s story is so full of holes. He says he made “a point” of telling Hunter his wife’s cancer was in remission when he started the affair. Why, so she wouldn’t think that he is the bottom feeder we all know him to be?
Second thing - if he “didn’t love” Hunter and the child isn’t his, then why betray his wife again by sneaking into Hunter’s hotel room in the middle of the night?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.