Posted on 08/09/2008 6:29:41 AM PDT by Zakeet
Well, it does appear that she is a slut; and Edwards is a male "slut".
When in her book hitting the shelves?
After the way Bedwards portrayed her I assume some edits are in the works.
yikes...looks like “Man” hands
Sounds to me they deserve each other.
...and Freepers seem more than happy to play the role written for them by the Edwards people. This woman chose not to abort her unborn, out of wedlock child, and her reward is to be ridiculed as a crack whore.
I agree. Whatever else these two might be, they aren’t baby killers.
> She looks like a middle school French teacher who’d do the soccer team (either sex) given half a chance <
Pics never lie? In other words, she’s definitely GUILTY!
I must say I was surprised and not surprised. Surprised that Edwards had an affair with anyone as he seems so self involved that I thought all he would need was himself. I was not surprised that, when he did go for a woman, she turned out to be an airhead...listening to her chatter was a postiive embarrassment to womankind. But on further consideration they do seem perfectly matched.
Mr. Edwards wife is to be pitied, she is facing a terminal disease and now has positive knowledge that the father of her children, who will be left to raise them, is a fool.
oh, oh, I know where this is heading.
There once was a woman named Druck,
who...
John Edwards was in the Regency Hotel Bar and became attracted to an airhead woman who was obviously drunk and then hired her to work for his campaign? Obviously, John Edwards knew exactly what he was doing and showed very poor judgement.
She became pregnant, she decided to keep the baby, and the situation is now her meal ticket for money. He seems to have taken responsibility and claimed paternity because there is no other reason for him to be having secret meetings in a hotel with her and her baby.
Because he is clean cut and looks like a Ken-Doll - the fault lies with the tramp/home-wrecker. That's what I think I'm reading on this forum. This can't possibly be the only time he's had an affair. It's just the first time he was caught.
My jaded self now openly wonders if she really is terminal or they used that as a complete ploy to try to win the election, since it was announced right around the time he decided to run, if memory serves.
I like or pity neither of them (the edwards’). Both losers
She has Man Hands.
As though Edwards had any say in the matter.
That baby is her social security and part owner in the Edward's fortune.
“Whatever else these two might be, they aren’t baby killers.”
One of them isn’t, at least. Edwards’ position on abortion tells all you need to know.
This always intrigued me. All of the women Clinton fooled around with were trashed in the most demeaning ways, but it was always couched as a reflection of THEIR character. Nothing much was said about Clinton’s judgment in consorting with such so-called “sleazy, trashy” women.
Excellent point. Kind of like the trailer trash reference to dragging a 100 dollar bill down the street and seeing what you come up with, BUT, did the one doing the dragging ever get called on it? As the timeless statement says, “it takes two to tango”.
But he’s a hero, now. After all, he ‘came forward’ and ‘admittted his mistakes(s)’ and now he’s ‘sorry.’
What a man.
You must of gone to better schools than I did.
...um
...come to think of it, who didn’t?
Are you referring to John “Humpy” Edwards??
I haven't seen an update on her condition since he withdrew from the race. I do hope, for her children's sake, that it was just a scam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.