The section of the law he quotes *only* applies if Obama was born outside the United States, which he fails to note. Obama’s place of birth is, of course, a matter of some current debate.
With his misreading of the statute, I’m interested in whether he got the part about the new law not being retroactive right. But it’s an interesting question.
What is actually astounding ( and I think revealing) is the fact that the Obama campaign has not hit back head on and concretely to put this issue to bed once and for all.
The lack of doing that is curious and to me, implies some inconvenient “truths” of some type may be lurking around this whole question— and the now increasingly likley birth certificate forgery.
With his misreading of the statute ...The Cracker Jacks company is requesting the return of Mr. Miller's law license.