The news media is supposed to play the Democrats’ game.
My guess is that Edwards’ fellow Democrats will tell him to pipe down. It’s an election year, and the Dems don’t want to damage their symbiotic relationship with the press.
I guess he goes back to ambulance chasing.
“Edwards continues to insist that he is not the father,”
Maybe he knows that because he talked to the baby, after it was first conceived, much like he talks to the dead, during court sessions.
Edwards furious with ABC News
So what is he going to do throw his purse at the camera?
He has always controlled his environment...depositions, the courts, past interviews, speeches. Now, having miscalculated (another mistake) he fecklessly directs fury at anyone but the culprit of this illconceived sordid affair (Travis Tritts' famous quote) because he can no longer control the lust of the beast which must be fed. He will not come to terms with himself. The lawyer who won so many cases and so much money, who imbued in him the very narcicism which got him into this fix, has such a throathold on him that he will lash out at anyone who causes him discomfort. Humility and truth will extricate him, and the pieces of his and his familys' lives, to begin to assymble some type of normalcy to their lives. I think he is still in Level One - Denial (Bucket List). Pride has surely come before this fall.
Edwards is furious at ABC News?
What a load o’ crap. If he was going to be furious about anything, he ought to be furious at his male reproductive member, that apparently has a mind of it’s own, a mind which is far more persuasive than the mind allegedly residing between Edwards’ ears.
Edwards needs to remember that old saying about ‘when you find yourself in a ‘ho, quit digging!’
Edwards is livid since ABC is supposed to do EXACTLY what a slimy leading Democrat TELLS them to do. ABC veered 0.01% from the manipulative carefully crafted detailed instructions from the Silky Pony.
Oh, the outrage!
Who cares who you’re mad at Edwards? There’s a war going on, and the more we can rid our country of ethically deficient government leaders such as yourself, the better.
Art: “But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.”
Life: “But the Senator, while insisting the child was not his, could not explain his presence there.”
I’m still shocked. Stunned. I thought Edwards was flaming.
Speaking of the “love child”: Given Edwards’ characterization of his (lack of) feelings for her mother, shouldn’t we find another sobriquet for the little b*stard?