Posted on 08/14/2008 12:29:16 PM PDT by pissant
Another issue of the National Enquirer, another round of sordid allegations about the extent to which John Edwards is lying about his affair with Rielle Hunter.
The four new pieces:
• Edwards didn't confess until after a campaign staffer walked in on him and Hunter having an "intimate moment" in hotel room. Word eventually got to Elizabeth Edwards, who then confronted John, who then admitted the whole thing. But this all happened after he'd already declared his candidacy for the presidency.
• The whole public tango over the DNA test, with Edwards saying he wants one and Hunter saying she doesn't: choreographed!
• Texas lawyer Fred Baron is still sending $15,000 a month to Rielle and $20,000 a month to alleged baby fall guy Andrew Young. (The New York Post has a reporter in Raleigh who interviewed a bunch of Young's neighbors; all pretty much expressed doubt that Young fathered the baby, but say he's loyal enough to Edwards to shoulder responsibility.
• Edwards last week called Hunter to tell her, "Of course I love you. Don't worry, we'll get through this."
As for how the Enquirer keeps getting access to information such as the intimate details of a private phone call while other major media outlets who have now devoted significant time and resources to the story still can't prove anything, Sharon Waxman ventures the obvious: they pay for stuff! We mentioned back on Wednesday that Hunter herself very well might be squeezing cash out of both Edwards and the Enquirer, and that the whole thing with her weird mystic friend Robert McGovern setting up the Beverly Hilton meeting had the faint whiff of blackmail gone awry. Writes Waxman:
"Imagine if Hunter was blackmailing Edwards for money—or, for more money, since she was already being paid a monthly stipend. And if she were pressuring him by leaking information to the National Enquirer. And if she tipped off the Enquirer to the July meeting, including such details as the number of rooms rented, and who was in them."
Imagine if it was Hunter who sold the Enquirer the blurry photo of John Edwards holding the baby of indeterminate paternity that David Perel declined to offer any details about, including who took it, or where, when, or how it was taken! (He told CNN last week that we can "presume" he paid for it.)
Edwards is probably wishing Hunter weren't so ambitious right around now.
For $35,000/month, I'll take credit for being the father and mother...
You’re gonna need a pantry full of Jiffy-Pop for this one.
There once was a woman named Druck
Who got paid to make movies and f***
She road him like a pony
But he was just a silky phony
Now they’re both just sh&* out of luck
Jeepers. Perhaps the best Elizabeth can do for her children is divorce John and find them a legal guardian while she’s still alive.
John is going to do a Camilla as soon as Elizabeth is buried.
(There is just something about a trial lawyer, twisting helplessly at the end of a rope of his own making that..that...I find ...just.)
Just saw on people.com that Rielle’s real name is Lisa Druck, born in Ft. Lauderdale, and she calls Edwards “Love Lips”.
Hasn’t Zsa-Zsa’s husband claimed paternity yet?
I think he has initated proceedings to adopt John Edwards.
“Love Lips” better hope the Enquirer hasn’t acquired his dna...
It they could get the photo in the hotel room, they’ve got DNA from mother, father and child.Had to be a payoff of a hotel staffer to get access to a photo like that.
lol!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.