Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whacked Priorities
The American Spectator ^ | August 18, 2008 | Ben Stein

Posted on 08/18/2008 2:44:34 PM PDT by AnnGora

I am sorry that John Edwards had an affair with a campaign worker. But I am not surprised. Men like to have affairs. Men like to have sex with new women. That's just how men are and always have been.

I am not surprised that a major Presidential candidate and former V.P. nominee of a major party had an affair. Politicians are men and they have all of the yearnings and drives that other men have. They do not check their flaws and essential elements at the Capitol cloakroom.

Nor is it a sign that Edwards might not have been a great public servant. The list of important men with great achievements who have had extramarital liaisons goes from Julius Caesar to Napoleon to Thomas Jefferson to John F. Kennedy to Bill Clinton and undoubtedly has a lot longer to run. John Edwards and Rielle Hunter are only a tiny footnote in this magnum opus

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: edwards; stein
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Marie2

That’s ridiculous. First of all, very few animal species eat their own offspring. Second, almost every human society that practiced cannibalism had never heard of Darwin or evolutionary theory. They had their own pagan creation myths. You can’t blame evolution for cannibalism.

People who condemn evolutionary theory rarely have even read about it. There is nothing in the theory of evolution that argues either for or against the existence of a God. Therefore, an evolutionist can be a Christian, a Jew, an atheist, an agnostic, or whatever else.


21 posted on 08/18/2008 3:51:33 PM PDT by JillValentine (Being a feminist is all about being a victim. Being an armed woman is all about not being a victim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

“Does the rooster mate with just one chicken?”

Oh no Mr. Coolidge. Many”

“Tell that to Mrs. Coolidge.


22 posted on 08/18/2008 4:03:52 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Edwards is not Stein’s hero. That would be Al Franken.


23 posted on 08/18/2008 4:06:18 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DManA
Good one! A fellow Snark, I presume?

I'm a "member" of the snark society---ring a bell?

24 posted on 08/18/2008 4:13:35 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

No. What is that? Sounds interesting.


25 posted on 08/18/2008 4:49:10 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DManA
The source of the Coolidge Effect is Dr. Frank A. Beach. The "Coolidge Effect" being his Presidential address to the EPA. Snarks are his former (he's deceased) Ph.D. students.

Herb Caen, formerly of the SF Chronicle, used to publish an annual tribute to the Beach and the story.

26 posted on 08/18/2008 5:03:31 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JillValentine

I’ve seen public television shows where a certain great ape (I thought it was a chimp?) killed and ate its own offspring. It’s not at all ridiculous. Many species do that.

I don’t blame evolution for cannibalism. My point is, that if you regard yourself as nothing but a more evolved ape, you have a sort of built in excuse for all sorts of wicked behavior.

Perhaps people who condemn evolutionary theory have rarely read about it, but I was raised an atheist evolutionist and attended public schools all my life.

I don’t know if I concur with your definition of “Christian” if it includes denying the truth of the Bible. Perhaps we can still be saved, as though through fire, even if we deny large portions of statements of direct creation sprinkled throughout Scripture. I would not, however, risk it.


27 posted on 08/18/2008 5:45:14 PM PDT by Marie2 (Everything the left does has the effect and intent of destroying the traditional family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

Care to elaborate? FR is pretty decent about avoiding perjoratives and getting to a civil debate. If we are just going to call each other names, what is the point?


28 posted on 08/18/2008 5:46:14 PM PDT by Marie2 (Everything the left does has the effect and intent of destroying the traditional family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Marie2
Marie, with this (If you think you are descended from apes, you can dismiss just about anything, including eating your own kids.) I don't need any pejoratives. Your own words serve you well.

Okay, you're not Looney Tunes...

29 posted on 08/18/2008 6:01:50 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

Perhaps you felt I was implying that you, personally, are some sort of kid-eater.

The “you” I was using was as an impersonal second person singular, you know? “If you could do this, you could do that.” Nothing personal intended, and if you do have children, I am sure you are very kind to them.

Over the years, I have heard a lot of hideous behavior justified by “we were just responding to our animal urges.” The older I get, the more odious this excuse becomes.


30 posted on 08/18/2008 6:09:22 PM PDT by Marie2 (Everything the left does has the effect and intent of destroying the traditional family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Bueller? Bueller?


31 posted on 08/18/2008 6:12:10 PM PDT by Chucky is a girlie man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marie2
I have heard a lot of hideous behavior justified by “we were just responding to our animal urges.

Aha! You're running in the wrong circles.

32 posted on 08/18/2008 6:47:27 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AnnGora
Ben, stop drinkin' those eye drops!


33 posted on 08/18/2008 8:05:06 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

I’d hoped people would mistake me for a PHD economist because of my perspicacious comments about economics. Not because I knew the story about the President and the rooster.

But thanks anyway. I guess.


34 posted on 08/18/2008 8:56:14 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DManA
Well, I'll fill in the parts I alluded to for you.

Frank Beach delivered his presidential address to the Eastern Psychological Assn. annual meeting. As was the custom, he reviewed some data from his own laboratory to the fawning, and yawning, audience. Noticing they weren't listening well, he began to add bogus, bizarre, data. When that didn't get them asking questions, as he had hoped, he said: "And so, distinguished colleagues, you can see that my data follow the pattern typical of the well-known "Coolidge Effect."

Since no one from the audience queried, even at that point, Dr. Beach presented the story of the Coolidge's Sunday outings. Not until the punch line did the audience show any attention. But then, when their brains caught up, they literally fell out of their seats laughing.

That's it.

Except...Beach went on to demonstrate the relative universality of the effect in a wide variety of laboratory animals and published it all.

35 posted on 08/18/2008 9:22:14 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

Are you a Snark?


36 posted on 08/19/2008 5:55:38 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Yep.


37 posted on 08/19/2008 6:00:54 AM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JillValentine
The list of important men with great achievements who have had extramarital liaisons goes from Julius Caesar to Napoleon to Thomas Jefferson to John F. Kennedy to Bill Clinton

Ever since he wrote this column, the ghosts of Julius Caesar, Napoleon, and Thomas Jefferson have been haunting him to demand an apology.

38 posted on 08/19/2008 6:04:26 AM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JillValentine
People who condemn evolutionary theory rarely have even read about it. There is nothing in the theory of evolution that argues either for or against the existence of a God. Therefore, an evolutionist can be a Christian, a Jew, an atheist, an agnostic, or whatever else.

Indeed. Stein is a hack with no talents other than the spinning of spurious pseudo-logic. The fact that he enjoys a reputation for being smart is a testament to public gullibility.

39 posted on 08/19/2008 6:07:07 AM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

Elite company we are in.

I took a course from Walter Heller at the UofMinn in the 70’s. Never met the “Great Man” but got to meet a nice teaching assistant from Asia (never understood a word he said). I think I’ve pretty much cleansed my mind of the experience.


40 posted on 08/19/2008 6:21:33 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson