Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Women Than Ever Are Childless, Census Finds
New York Times ^ | August 18, 2008 | Katie Zezima

Posted on 08/19/2008 6:54:24 AM PDT by reaganaut1

Women are waiting longer to have children, and more women than ever are choosing not to have children at all, according to a new Census Bureau report.

Twenty percent of women ages 40 to 44 have no children, double the level of 30 years ago, the report said; and women in that age bracket who do have children have fewer than ever — an average of 1.9 children, compared with the median of 3.1 children in 1976.

“A lot of women are not having any children,” said Jane Lawler Dye, a Census Bureau researcher who did the report, which looked at women of childbearing age in 2006. “It used to be sort of expected that there was a phase of life where you had children, and a lot of women aren’t doing that now,” Ms. Dye said.

Women with advanced degrees are more likely to be childless, the study found. Of women 40 to 44 with graduate or professional degrees, 27 percent are childless, compared with 18 percent of women who did not continue their education beyond high school, the data show.

The numbers are consistent with a 2006 report Ms. Dye issued on the same subject. While year-by-year change is slow, Ms. Dye said, the data show that women of the baby boom generation are continuing to transform the American family.

Hispanic women are the only group bucking the trends found in the study, averaging 2.3 children each by their 40s. The number of children a Hispanic woman has decreases sharply, however, depending on how many generations her family has lived in the United States, the data show.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: census; childfree; demographics; genx; hispanics; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last
To: MrB

We’re doing our best with 4 homeschooled kids.


41 posted on 08/19/2008 7:20:31 AM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Zechariah_8_13

They then focus their energy on “getting” YOUR kids.

That way, they can pass on their values while still living a narcissistic lifestyle.


42 posted on 08/19/2008 7:20:43 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon
We’re doing our best with 4 homeschooled kids.

hurrah, kudos, and GOD BLESS!

43 posted on 08/19/2008 7:21:45 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: tiki
"How many women are childless because they had early abortions, STDs, or waited too long?"

After 45 million abortions since Roe v. Wade, a huge number. And don't forget that abortion increases the risk of breast cancer and the incidence of endometriosis.

And, with STD infection rates at 50% or higher among sexually promiscuous young adults, many women are or will be sterile, also.

44 posted on 08/19/2008 7:22:14 AM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Which is why we homeschool. ;) (see my borrowed tagline)


45 posted on 08/19/2008 7:24:49 AM PDT by Zechariah_8_13 ("If we give the bureaucrats our children, we may as well give them everything else." - J. G. Machen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

From the HealthNews Website, article titled STD's affect 26 Percent of Female Teens: On March 11, 2008 the Centers for Disease Control released data...study found that African-American girls are the most affected as almost 50 percent have an STD, compared to 20 percent of white teen girls and 20 percent of Mexican girls. The infection rate was 40 percent among all girls who admitted to being sexually active

I find it interesting that the % of childless women is about the same percentage of women with STDs.

47 posted on 08/19/2008 7:26:10 AM PDT by figetyfiggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1; Fred Nerks
intelligent women having fewer children reduces the average level of intelligence>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

NAH! You miss the point.

If they were intelligent , they WOULD be having children.

These women are less intelligent, and their genes deserve to enter the Darwinian scrap pile.

And on top of all that they likely have been so disintelligent as to create the very gurly men that they are loath to marry.

(I mean, Maureen O'Dowd went to Australia looking for a lumberjack type, she would have no truck with the panseys that feminist culture had created.)

Darwin Award in Order!

48 posted on 08/19/2008 7:26:32 AM PDT by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, (Ridicule Obama))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I wish I had children. I have never been married so no kids for me.


49 posted on 08/19/2008 7:27:54 AM PDT by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
I heard a little of Boortz just before Rush came on one day, and he was reading some study that stated: single young college-age women are liberal, then when they get married, they become more conservative, then when they have children they become the most conservative (want the government to stay the 'H' out of their family's business), then when they get divorced, they become more liberal than ever.

The reason is that when they become divorced, single parents, they want the government to be their husband and take care of them and to be the father and raise their children.

I don't know if this is true, but it sounded cool.

50 posted on 08/19/2008 7:29:14 AM PDT by KriegerGeist (Lifetime member of the "Christian-Radical-Right-Wing-Kook-Factor")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: Morgana

The left (feminism) has pushed the idea of career fulfillment over family, or at least the lie that you can do both.

My assertion stands. The valuing of career over family is simply a reflection of social policies and cultural moves that have encouraged this attitude. It is not just something that happened in a vacuum.


52 posted on 08/19/2008 7:30:50 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Because 27% of women with graduate or professional degrees are childless, I will be less likely to encourage my daughter than my sons to pursue education beyond college or be career-oriented. The decisions will be theirs, of course.

I think it is more about timing. Pursue the degrees after you have started a family. Having children is for the young. It's hard work.

BTW, I've been advising my sons that it is much smarter not to pursue career women. Life is much more fulfilling with a family.

53 posted on 08/19/2008 7:33:06 AM PDT by wmfights (Believe - THE GOSPEL - and be saved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #54 Removed by Moderator

To: gimme1ibertee
“More Women Are Childless”

Not if they have husbands!! LOLOL

I had to laugh at your comment...:)

55 posted on 08/19/2008 7:41:12 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

“Did Rome REALLY fall because of homosexuality???? I think that is a myth.”

No Rome fell apart due to the complete disintegration of their culture and morality. Acceptance of things like homosexuality contributed to the downfall but were not the root cause.

JMHO


56 posted on 08/19/2008 7:43:27 AM PDT by driftdiver (No More Obama - The corruption hasnÂ’t changed despite all our hopes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

It’s pretty hard to find a “non-career” woman with above average intelligence today. People consider it almost a sin for a girl to be family orientated. At least here in the PRNYC.

Most men don’t want to marry young and women don’t want to wait for them.


57 posted on 08/19/2008 7:43:36 AM PDT by varyouga ("Rove is some mysterious God of politics & mind control" - DU 10-24-06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee; Alter Kaker; reaganaut1
Circa 2020, the USA will crumble beneath the weight of the demographic imperative, and there's no telling what will emerge to replace it [or even if anything will emerge at all].

Don't fall into the trap of the fear of change. The sons and daughters of the new immigrants (legal & illegal) will marry children of other ancestry. The children of the various waves of european immigrants did the same thing. The country has always thrived on new blood.

58 posted on 08/19/2008 7:46:08 AM PDT by wmfights (Believe - THE GOSPEL - and be saved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Adopt.

In the present culture war, it is far more important to pass on your values than your genes.

I'll second that. Consider the Reagans, Michael and Ron, Jr. One has the genes, one has the values.

59 posted on 08/19/2008 7:46:43 AM PDT by thulldud (Heteronormative since the first trimester.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: varyouga
It’s pretty hard to find a “non-career” woman with above average intelligence today.

Only if you have a bias against traditional values. There are lots of places to look church, family friends, personal friends, at work.

Most men don’t want to marry young and women don’t want to wait for them.

Ever hear the phrase, "I can't find a good man, they're all married"?

The smart guys find the right girl and settle down. The perpetual adolescents are never ready to grow up and become adults.

60 posted on 08/19/2008 7:57:09 AM PDT by wmfights (Believe - THE GOSPEL - and be saved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson