Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton-Obama Rift Continues, As Party Seeks Unity -- and a Denver Message
ABC News The Note ^ | August 26, 2008 | RICK KLEIN with HOPE DITTO and AMANDA TEMPLE

Posted on 08/26/2008 2:30:07 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy

The narrative is (or isn't) coming together, the family was glowing on stage, the schedule is holding tight, Teddy and Michelle hit them out of the park . . . and still there are the Clintons.

For all those 18 million cracks in the highest glass ceiling, a frosty divide still needs chipping away at, even as Obama is set to lose the "presumptive" from his title.

It comes to this for the rivalry for the ages: Neither Sen. Barack Obama nor Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has any possible sane, rational reason for wanting tensions to continue.

They need each other, and they know it. If Clinton supporters don't come to Obama's side in greater (near-unanimous) numbers, he loses the presidency. If Clinton is seen as doing anything less than everything for the Obama-Biden ticket, she loses stature in the Democratic Party.

And yet. . . . the relationship is complicated as ever. As Sen. Clinton prepares for her speech on Night Two of the Democratic National Convention (with Chelsea Clinton narrating an introductory tribute video, on a night where the theme is "Renewing America's Promise"), those "Hillary" signs and pins dotting Denver carry a message -- and Clinton and Obama carry (mixed) messages of their own.

Did we need this reminder, this week of all weeks? "Remember: 18 million people voted for me -- 18 million people, give or take, voted for Barack," Clinton, D-N.Y., told reporters Monday, per ABC's Eloise Harper. (Give or take?)

Then there's the Clintons' most recognizable surrogate/adviser, going on television Monday night to basically declare one-fourth of Obama's convention a messaging disaster.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008dncconvention; chaos; clinton; hillary; intradebrokeredconv; obama; puma
From the article:

"The getting-to-know-you phase featured several branches of Obama's family tree on the podium, including his brother-in-law, his half sister and several longtime friends and associates from his adopted home state," the Chicago Tribune's Jim Tankersley writes.

No sign of any of Obama's brothers, including the one living on $1 per month in a shack in Kenya.

1 posted on 08/26/2008 2:30:07 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Clinton-Obama Rift Continues, As Party Seeks Unity -- and a Denver Message

The media apparently has permission to discuss the "rift." That in itself is telling.

2 posted on 08/26/2008 2:30:58 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (when you're bot, you're pwn3d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

When the dust settles, the news media will be licking its wounds while wondering why they failed yet again to annoint a new King.


3 posted on 08/26/2008 2:34:54 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
who mows the lawn ?
4 posted on 08/26/2008 2:36:34 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
When the dust settles, the news media will be licking its wounds while wondering why they failed yet again to annoint a new King.

They'll be crying all the way to the bank.

5 posted on 08/26/2008 2:38:17 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (when you're bot, you're pwn3d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
who mows the lawn ?

What lawn?

6 posted on 08/26/2008 2:39:02 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (when you're bot, you're pwn3d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

“the one living on $1 per month...”

Brother under the bus alert.


7 posted on 08/26/2008 2:46:30 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Will the story line go through November, I wonder? Then, if Obama loses, they will blame his defeat on the split in the party? We’ll see.

At this point, I bet the Clintons hope Obama loses so Hillary can run again in 2012. And I have a feeling she didn’t want to be Obama’s running mate, because, as she privately told people, he can’t win the general election. She would rather stay out of this year’s election and take her chances in 2012. No need to sully her sterling reputation by being the running mate on a losing ticket this year.


8 posted on 08/26/2008 2:51:37 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Open questions:
1. I thought the convention was to confirm the nominee. Why is it BO’s choice on how to count the vote? Who decides on these mechinations of which states to count and when to stop counting etc?
2. Can a state refuse to list BO as a candidate tonight and thereby deny him votes? He has to have a certain number to be confirmed right?


9 posted on 08/26/2008 2:52:23 PM PDT by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

unity?

you can’t get 3 socialist professors to agree on anything.


10 posted on 08/26/2008 3:03:52 PM PDT by ken21 (people die and you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

ANY questions?....BAWAHHAHAHAHA!!

11 posted on 08/26/2008 3:22:53 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
They need each other, and they know it. If Clinton supporters don't come to Obama's side in greater (near-unanimous) numbers, he loses the presidency.

I don't think this is concerning to them. McCain makes a fairly convincing Democrat so four years with him probably isn't going to repulse them too much. Not if it means their girl gets another shot in '12.

If Clinton is seen as doing anything less than everything for the Obama-Biden ticket, she loses stature in the Democratic Party.

If Obama wins she loses stature in the Party, unless she can put up an effective roadblock in the Senate towards any legislation he favors. I have no doubt that will be her goal should he win.

Perhaps Barack and his supporters should not have frozen her out. At this point she really has nothing to lose by continuing on this path.

12 posted on 08/26/2008 4:17:18 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bossmechanic

I trust someone will answer or has answered these...I certainly don’t know the answers; apologies.


13 posted on 08/26/2008 5:39:59 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (when you're bot, you're pwn3d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson