Military Losses by President

Government Publications ^ | 9/3/2008 | econjack

[econjack]

Military Losses, 1980 thru 2007*

Whatever your politics, however you lean, and however you feel about the current administration, this report should open some eyes.

As tragic as the loss of any member of the US Armed Forces is, consider the following statistics: The annual fatalities of military members while actively serving in the armed forces from 1980 through 2006 - by any cause.

*1980 .......... 2,392 (Carter Year)

1981 .......... 2,380 (Reagan Year)

1984 .......... 1,999 (Reagan Year)

1988 .......... 1,819 (Reagan Year)

1989 .......... 1,636 (George H Year)

1990 .......... 1,508 (George H Year)

1991 .......... 1,787 (George H Year)

1992 .......... 1,293 (George H Year)

1993 .......... 1,213 ( Clinton Year)

1994 .......... 1,075 ( Clinton Year)

1995 .......... 2,465 ( Clinton Year)

1996 .......... 2,318 ( Clinton Year)

1997 .......... 817 ( Clinton Year)

1998 .......... 2,252 ( Clinton Year)

1999 .......... 1,984 ( Clinton Year)

2000 ..........1,983 ( Clinton Year)

2001 ............. 890** **(George W Year)

2002 .......... 1,007 (George W Year)

2003 .......... 1,410 (George W Year)

2004 .......... 1,887 (George W Year)

2005 ............. 919 (George W Year)

2006.............. 920 (George W Year)

2007............. 899 ( George W Year )*

* Clinton ** **years (1993-2000): 14,107 deaths

George W years (2001-2007): 7,932 deaths*

If you are surprised when you look at these figures, so was I. These figures mean that the loss from the two latest conflicts in the Middle East are LESS than the loss of military personnel during Bill Clinton 's presidency; when America wasn't even involved in a war! (Unless you include Bosnia or the disgrace of Mogadishu , Somalia when Clinton failed to respond to terrorists. Remember 'Blackhawk Down'?)

And, I was even more shocked when I read that in 1980, during the reign of President (Nobel Peace Prize winner) Jimmy Carter , there were 2,392 US military fatalities! From what? How?

I think that these figures indicate that many members of our Media and our politicians will pick and choose the information on which they report. Of course we all know that they present only those 'facts' which support their agenda-driven reporting. But why do so many of them march in lock-step to twist the truth? Where do so many of them get their agenda? Obviously there is one shared agenda. Could it be from the most powerful Democratic family of the decade?

Do you want further proof? Consider the latest census of Americans. It shows the following FACTS about the distribution of American citizens, by race:

*European descent .......................69.12%

Hispanic......................................12.5%

Black .................... .....................12.3%

Asian........................................... 3.7%

Native American............................1.0%

Other............................................2.6%*

Many media lead us to feel the military death ratio is off balanced compared to the distribution by race in America . Here are the fatalities by RACE over the past three years in Iraqi Freedom. Do the comparison yourself.

*European descent (white) .........74.31%

Hispanic...................................10.74%

Black ........................................9.67%

Asian....................................... 1.81%

Native American....................... 1.09%

Other....................................... 0.33%*

I was surprised again. Our mainstream media continues to spin these figures (for political gain). Nothing more. It's all about politics.

I hope that during the time between now and November, intelligent Americans can decipher: the facts from the spin, the spinners from the leaders, those who seek even more power from those that seek justice, and the dividers from the uniters.

Over the next months let's be good listeners and see and hear who tries to divide our nation; and who wants to unite our nation. Who wants to control how our money is spent and who wants our money spent the way we would spend it. Who seeks power and who seeks justice? Who spins the facts and who is genuine.

(These statistics are published by Congressional Research Service, and** **they may be confirmed by anyone at the source URL or:

http://do/redirect?url=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.fas.org%252Fsgp%252Fcrs%252Fnatsec%252FRL32492.pdf

'History does not entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid.' - Dwight D. Eisenhower

[econjack]

The article gives military deaths by President and also a demographic breakout. Odd...you never see this in the MSM when they talk about Iraq...wonder why?

[petercooper]

bttt

[Coldwater Creek]

Thanks, this is very interesting!

[penelopesire]

Very useful info. Thanks for posting.

[RedRover]

Thanks for posting.

[nkycincinnatikid]

stunning facts

[Kozak]

The url is a broken link.

[SueRae]

*ping* for my next ‘discussion’ with some of my more liberal ‘Blame Bush’ friends. (seems oxymoronic, doesn’t it?...but I’m still trying to educate them from liberal brainwashing)

[piroque]

bttt

[Mr. Lucky]

Do you have an actual source?

[Kozak]

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf

this one works

[RobFromGa]

bump...

[Hoplite]

Actual Source.

This article was BS when it was posted a week ago, it's BS today, and it'll be BS the next time someone who can't be bothered to do any fact checking throws it up.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

Excellent post. Site is bookmarked for arguing with Liberals in my spare time. ;)

[TommyDale]

During the Carter and Clinton years, we suffered losses due to faulty equipment and the lack of spare parts, thanks to those two cutting military spending to the bone. They were both traitorous morons when it came to supporting the military.

[econjack]

My bad...see #11

[savedbygrace]

Jaw dropping.

[AmericanMade1776]

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf

[RobFromGa]

I think the numbers you have are wrong, look at the source document...

[Alter Kaker]

Snopes says it’s wrong.