Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Ohio) Absentee-ballot policy under fire (Democrat tosses out McCain absentee ballots)
Columbus Dispatch ^ | Tuesday, September 9, 2008 3:14 AM | Mark Niquette

Posted on 09/11/2008 10:59:13 AM PDT by weegee

In the 2004 presidential race, Democrats cried foul when Republican Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell initially ordered that voter-registration cards be rejected if the paper used wasn't thick enough.

Now, Republican John McCain's campaign is complaining that Blackwell's successor, Democrat Jennifer Brunner, has decided that certain absentee-ballot applications should be rejected if a box on the form isn't checked.

McCain's camp is worried that potentially thousands of requests for absentee ballots will be rejected and voters forced to reapply -- if they get notice that their application wasn't accepted, said Jon Seaton, McCain's regional campaign manager.

At issue is a mailing that McCain sent last week to more than 1 million Ohioans urging them to vote early by requesting an absentee ballot. The form included space for voters to provide the required personal information.

But Brunner ordered last week that if voters do not check a box next to a statement that says, "I am a qualified elector and would like to receive an absentee ballot," the application should be rejected and the voter notified that his or her request is deficient.

Brunner, who said county elections officials had asked about the issue, argued that by not checking the box, voters would not meet a legal requirement that every request contain a statement that the person is a qualified elector.

She noted that on the state's application form, there is a statement directly above a signature line that says the applicant attests to being a qualified voter. McCain's form has that statement next to the box to be checked.

"Failure to check the box leaves both the applicant and the board of elections without verification that the applicant is a 'qualified elector,' " Brunner wrote, recommending that those voters be sent a letter with the state's form.

But Seaton, who did not suggest that partisan motives were at play, argued that the forms mailed by the campaign should be accepted as long as all other required information is provided.

He also said that similar absentee-ballot forms sent out last fall by U.S. Rep. Bob Latta, R-Bowling Green, when he was running in a special election to replace the late Paul Gillmor, were accepted even if the box wasn't checked. "The form includes all the necessary requirements and has been used in past elections, so this election should be no different," Seaton said. "Qualified voters who request absentee ballots should receive them."

Brunner spokesman Jeff Ortega said no questions were raised about Latta's mailing at the time but that state law requires, among other things, both the voter's signature and a statement that the person is a qualified elector.

"This office believes the law is crystal clear on this issue," Ortega said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 2008; cultureofcorruption; democrats; democratscheat; disenfranchised; elections; howtostealanelectin; jenniferbrunner; mccainpalin; ohio; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: leakinInTheBlueSea

How much you want to bet all the applications with last names like “Lopez” and “Menendez” and “Rodriguz” will be upheld even if they didn’t check the box?


21 posted on 09/11/2008 1:16:06 PM PDT by Thane_Banquo (You can put lipstick on a donkey, but it's still just a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47
... by not checking the box, voters would not meet a legal requirement that every request contain a statement that the person is a qualified elector.
22 posted on 09/11/2008 1:23:54 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Sorry, the Dems got us on this one. It was stupid to put the box on the form. It was stupid to make up a new form at all. They should have exactly duplicated whatever form the state uses.


23 posted on 09/11/2008 1:24:47 PM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

We should storm her office and force her to back down.


24 posted on 09/11/2008 1:34:40 PM PDT by montag813 (www.BoycottUsWeekly.com | Fight the Smears | Fight the Sexism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GloriaJane

They ain’t gonna be able to rig the vote, since the gap BO looses by will be to large...


25 posted on 09/11/2008 1:37:46 PM PDT by Edgerunner (At the heart of every absurdity, lies a liberal lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: montag813; LS

Then they should be able to get a provisional ballot, right?


26 posted on 09/11/2008 1:38:27 PM PDT by Perdogg (Sen Robert Byrd - Ex community organizer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: weegee

If McCain’s people added such a box, showing it as a requirement, then it is required.

I can’t fault the officials who want to enforce the rules McCain made.


27 posted on 09/11/2008 1:42:56 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (1 conservative = 5 RINOs. You can expect 4 out of 5 RINOs to bolt to the liberal side on any vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edgerunner
Don't be so sure. In Chicago, they are registering the homeless. Since these people have no fixed address, they can appear at various polling places, with various names and addresses. Attempts to question them will lead to charges of racism. Similar hijinx can take place in Cleveland and Cincinnati. (A little reported story is that democrats committed massive voter fraud in Milwaukee during the Bush-Kerry election. Eventually the fraud was discovered and several people went to jail. But the Milwaukee fraud, involving inner city blacks and white Marquette U students, was enough to cost Bush the close Wisconsin state election. McCain should win Wisconsin this time.)
28 posted on 09/11/2008 1:49:24 PM PDT by Godwin1 (godwin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: weegee

I’m surprised how many people are blindly opposing the Secretary of State. It was stupid of McCain to use anything other than the exact standard form. Do Freepers REALLY want to issue ballots to people who have a big unchecked box by the line “I am eligible to vote?”


29 posted on 09/11/2008 1:59:53 PM PDT by TennesseeProfessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000
That is a shocking story.
30 posted on 09/11/2008 2:14:00 PM PDT by Churchillspirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Well, there aren’t many of those in Ohio.


31 posted on 09/11/2008 2:21:38 PM PDT by RockinRight (Obama who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Godwin1
There was double voting by college students throughout Wisconsin in 2004. It was driven by the Kerry campaign and fueled by BDS. The difference this time is the Bradley Factor. I have had conversations with white collar workers in the SW part of the state that were shocking for the intensity of hatred towards zerO. It is part racism and part because of his arrogance, lack of a positive legislative record and his age. I am fairly certain a majority of these anti-BHO voters did vote for Kerry in 2004.

We have hockey moms and female deer hunters, here.I think if the vote isn't close, this time, GOP can take the state. I was hearing positive comments about McCain from some old hippies back a couple of years ago, so they won't feel like traitors for voting for McCain.

32 posted on 09/11/2008 2:23:14 PM PDT by reformedliberal (God bless Saracuda America, speaking truth to power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: weegee

btt


33 posted on 09/11/2008 6:54:59 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
It's a stupid mistake

The media will probably describe it as a dirty trick designed to somehow steal the election for McCain.

34 posted on 09/11/2008 8:12:14 PM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Remember 2000 in Florida where the dems dispatched a memo and lawyers to disqualify absentee (military) voters? They are organized about this stuff.


35 posted on 09/11/2008 8:55:12 PM PDT by Mr. Peabody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson