Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SARAH ON ABC TONIGHT (VIDEOS)
Ms Underestimated ^ | 9/11/08 | Ms. Underestimated

Posted on 09/11/2008 5:41:16 PM PDT by Dawnsblood

Tonight, Sarah Palin sat down with Charlie Gibson for an interview, and ABC showed us Charlie’s first two segments. The first portion dealt with her readiness for leadership, and the second dealt with foreign policy. I’ll let you watch and be the judge, but I think Sarah’s ready for her closeup. Others in the blogosphere thought she didn’t do well, but seeing as Charlie had his questions prepared, Sarah did not have her answers prepared, and the fact that I do not believe these questions have ever been asked of an other V.P. candidate, I’m still pleased with her performance. And in that vein, I agree with her; what other V.P., former-governor, candidates have extensive experience in foreign relations? She’s been running a state, for God’s sake!

(Excerpt) Read more at msunderestimated.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: 2008veep; abc; abcnews; chucklestheclown; gibsonpalin; interview; palin; video
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last
To: Freee-dame

You (and Rush) are right! Interviews that can be edited can be butchered, as this one was. I saw the initial cut & what they broadcast, and noticed Charlie’s ‘That is an exact quote’ foolishness disappeared in the later edit. That, in turn, made a part of her response hard to follow.

She should insist, at a minimum, that the raw tape of any interview be posted on the web.

However, the main takeaway I got was that Charlie Gibson thinks only a Senator with 20+ years of experience is fit to be President...unless he is both the democrat and Messiah!


101 posted on 09/11/2008 7:22:33 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Mav & the Barracuda vs. Messiah and the Mouth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: frankenMonkey

You’re right, but she knew what she said, and she answered the question perfectly.


102 posted on 09/11/2008 7:28:17 PM PDT by diamond6 (Is SIDS preventable? www.stopsidsnow.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Geist Krieger
I think ole Charlie Rose (and the REAL DRIVERS - his producers and speech writers (er, question writers) ) were showing to THEIR buddies in the MSM that “See? See? See? WE at ABC are not going to be soft and nice to this lipstick mommy wanna-be who is disrupting OUR coronation of the Anointed One. WE are going to be tough. SEE HOW TOUGH WE ARE. Look at us, WE got the interview YOU wanted, WE are tough.”
103 posted on 09/11/2008 7:31:02 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Bill813

You’re right. The way she quoted Lincoln and referred to the Constitution was masterful!

How could he argue with that?


104 posted on 09/11/2008 7:32:56 PM PDT by diamond6 (Is SIDS preventable? www.stopsidsnow.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

She did good in the face of tough snarky questions that haven’t even been asked of Obama.


105 posted on 09/11/2008 7:34:04 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

I wish Ms. Palin would learn how to pronounce “nuclear”.

Even after the edits, I thought she did fine.


106 posted on 09/11/2008 7:44:48 PM PDT by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

I believe Sarah Palin did a great job of answering Gibson’s pointed questions.

As I was watching Sarah answer the questions, I was thinking of how Barack Obama would answer the same questions.

Would Barack Obama have stuttered and stammered as he usually does?

Again this is another of example where the America public in their own minds will be comparing the capabilities of VP Candidate Palin to PRESIDENTIAL candidate Obama.

Again, Palin comes off as good and maybe even better than Obama.

Exactly where McCain wants the American public to be.


107 posted on 09/11/2008 7:45:43 PM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: anonsquared
When Gibson was hammering her about what does energy independence have to do with national security, Palin needed to say: “CONGRESSES INACTION AND DELIBERATE CLOSING DOWN OF THE U.S. DEVELOPING ITS OWN RESOURCES HAS ALLOWED AMERICA’S ENEMIES TO BLACKMAIL US. AND YES CHARLIE, THAT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH NATIONAL SECURITY!”

Palin did give a good answer to that question, but it was over Gibsons head. Her answer was that energy was the foundation of national security...and it is!! Wars are fought over who controls oil...energy. That's why Russia invaded Georgia, to gain a measure of control over a major pipeline. If the middle east were nothing but a big sandpile then nobody would care what was going on there.

108 posted on 09/11/2008 7:46:46 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pvoce
Will we see any of these same questions with Biden, I wonder?

Is Gibson scheduled to follow Joe Biden around for two days and do numerous interviews with him?

109 posted on 09/11/2008 7:47:46 PM PDT by REPANDPROUDOFIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: REPANDPROUDOFIT
Is Gibson scheduled to follow Joe Biden around for two days and do numerous interviews with him? Nahhh.....He might accidentally pull out a hair plug;)
110 posted on 09/11/2008 7:51:43 PM PDT by pvoce ('Good' sense and 'Common' sense are two entirely different concepts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt
As I said in my post, his toughness toward Obama is a different subject. We need to stop expecting them to be "fair", it's not going to happen.

The idea is to show up and be smarter, tougher, more confident, more well-informed. That's how to beat them.

I think she did a nice job.

111 posted on 09/11/2008 7:54:20 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: REPANDPROUDOFIT

I want to see how Obama would have answered Gibson’s questions.


112 posted on 09/11/2008 7:54:46 PM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

The longer the liberal media keeps up the “inexperience” drumbeat, the worse it’ll be for Obama.


113 posted on 09/11/2008 8:00:50 PM PDT by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

Okay I watched it.

Madam Cuda, you blew him away. Gibson, you have nothing.


114 posted on 09/11/2008 8:23:35 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Reaganism lives--take a look at Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pvoce
You will have to put up with the prerequisite advertisement.

You mean the one from CITGO? I don't think Chavez got his money's worth out of Charlie

115 posted on 09/11/2008 8:26:28 PM PDT by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: grame
It seemed to me he was pressing to get the answers he wanted. The answers that would make the best sound bites for tomorrow. It was like he was trying to corner her into making a mistake.

That is exactly what he was trying to do. I wanted to reach through the screen and smack him.

116 posted on 09/11/2008 8:28:10 PM PDT by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: REPANDPROUDOFIT
I don't think any candidate would/could/should answer that with a simple yes or no.

I wonder how it would play if, when pressed 'is that a yes or no' after answering a question, she replied somewhat to the effect of "I think the viewers can figure it out".

117 posted on 09/11/2008 8:37:45 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: carcraft
Governor, let me start by asking you a question that I asked John McCain about you, and it is really the central question. Can you look the country in the eye and say "I have the experience and I have the ability to be not just vice president, but perhaps president of the United States of America?"

Senator Obama, can you look the country in the eye and say "I have the experience and I have the ability to be president of the United States of America?"

And you didn't say to yourself, "Am I experienced enough? Am I ready? Do I know enough about international affairs? Do I -- will I feel comfortable enough on the national stage to do this?"

Senator Obama, are you experienced enough? Are you ready? Do you know anything about international affairs?

But this is not just reforming a government. This is also running a government on the huge international stage in a very dangerous world. When I asked John McCain about your national security credentials, he cited the fact that you have commanded the Alaskan National Guard and that Alaska is close to Russia. Are those sufficient credentials?

Senator Obama, it seems that Governor Palin has explained that she has sufficient credentials, but really you are the one that is running for the office of President, not Governor Palin. Just exactly, what are your credentials?

Have you ever met a foreign head of state?

Mr. Gibson, can you tell me how many of our 43 presidents have met a foreign head of state before they were in office? Sorry Charlie, some of them never even met a foreign head of state after they were in office...
118 posted on 09/11/2008 8:38:21 PM PDT by Brown Deer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: diamond6
However, they did show her video, so it didn’t matter.

From what I've read, the video itself actually starts mid-sentence. I hope Palin and McCain publicize a source for the complete sentence on YouTube.

119 posted on 09/11/2008 8:40:01 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Tymesup
I wish Ms. Palin would learn how to pronounce “nuclear”.

Enough educated people go with that pronunciation that I would not consider it a sign of stupidity any more than would many other other regional variations in speech (e.g. joo-lur-ee). I see no need for pedantry with regard to that word.

120 posted on 09/11/2008 8:48:12 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson