Posted on 09/12/2008 7:55:47 AM PDT by IrishMike
I have observed that type of body language in many liberals who think their IQs are higher than yours and that only they know best.
Elections come and go, but Sarah Palin is a fundamental threat to the base of the Democratic Party.
It was Cato the Elder, and he would end any speech in the Senate about any subject with “and furthermore, Carthage should be destroyed”. “Carthago delenda est”
She threatens a core element of the dRAT party’s base - women.
The Democrats and liberal media are hysterical.
I guess I’m alone here, but I thought Gibson was fine.
Gov. Palin has to be able to handle these tests, to show she is strong. And so far, so good.
Look she can’t just go on Limbaugh’s show, he wouldn’t ask anything of substance. She also can’t have a press conference, she’d take too many shots.
But Gibson is fine, Brokaw better, and Lehrer better yet.
“...fear the power of a conservative woman.”
As they should. A conservative woman is sure of herself, can administer a blow between the pant legs in a skirt and heels, and look graceful doing it, tag a moose at 200 yards, field dress it, then get home in time to stir things up as a community leader (unlike a community organizer).
I'm hoping that McCain-Palin will not allow even the setting to be repeated - they were sitting way too close - Palin seemed small and what's his name large - which is the case, but compare that to the setting between O’Reilly and Hillary - even the setting was fair and balanced.
The obvious “I don't believe you” demeanor of Gibson was way over the top.
“Gov. Palin has to be able to handle these tests, to show she is strong.”
Brother, have you ever seen those photos of her with the moose? We know she’s strong. Gov. Palin has five children, for goodness sakes.
No conservative objects to interviews with the “reporters” from the Red propaganda machine. It is the double standard we object to. A perfect example would be Oprah.
McCain's campaign probably only chose ABC News, who in turn tapped Gibson. It is easy to see why it was ABC. NBC is too lefty, CBS would use Couric, which would be a distraction, Fox would be considered too friendly, and CNN not worthy. So it was ABC.
I would like to know what “Charlie” thinks are credentials that prepare someone for the office POTUS. Seriously can anyone say they are truly ready any more than she can? Maybe a vice-president, but know one in this election, IMO.
I personally take great delight in the thought that the “reigning anchor” of New York news was unable to smite Governor Palin with his grim, disapproving stare.
Remember, folks, that this was her first mano-a-mano with the MSM. She’s only going to get better...
Will there be any casual interviewing? You know, walking with the candidate through Wasilla instead of grilling her?
I trashed the letter.
It was the least I could do.
Get off the air ya big dope!
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
. . Hah! With the “Obama One”, most high, most exalted, Charlie was lost in a flurry of “uh’s” . . . “uh, uh, change, uh, uh, hope, uh, uh, uh, stinky, uh, uh, lipstick, uh, uh, fish . . . . uh, uh and for good measure, uh, Charlie . . and, oh yeah, I forgot, uh, I might add audacity . .”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.