Posted on 09/15/2008 2:36:14 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
Sarah Palin: A Worthless Bag of Hair
14.09.2008 Source: URL: http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/106355-sarahworthless-0
Sarah Palin gave Charles Gibson, of the ABC television network, an exclusive interview. Here is a quote from Sarah Palin in her ABC interview: “For Russia to have exerted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable.”
Is that so, Sarah? In the interview, she certainly did prove one thing. She can lie and be dishonest just like the rest of them.
Not only did she show total ignorance of even what US intelligence services now confirm and admit, that Georgia was the aggressor in a campaign of genocide which Russia stopped, but she was totally clueless when questioned about the Bush Doctrine. Instead, Palin tried make believe she didn’t realize that the interviewer knew she didn’t have a clue what he was talking about.
Gibson: Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?
Palin: In what respect, Charlie?
Gibson: Well, what do you interpret it to be?
Palin: His world view?
Gibson: The Bush doctrine, in September 2002, before the Iraq war.
Palin: I believe that what President Bush has attempted to do is rid this world of Islamic terrorists who are hell-bent in destroying our nation. There have been blunders along the way, though. there have been mistakes made, and with new leadership, and that's the beauty of American elections, of course, and democracy, is with new leadership comes opportunity to do things better.
(Excerpt) Read more at english.pravda.ru ...
Just signed on in August?
Troll. ====
I am not sure I understand your comment...
It would have been silly to answer a vague question like “whats your position on the Bush Doctrine”.
The list (so far) of people who desperately hate Sarah Palin:
1. The Feminists
2. The Obama campaign
3. The MainStream Media
4. The Russians
5. Leftist Professors the world over
That’s it! thar’s it!. . If Pravda and the ruskies don’t endorse her, I’m voting for Obama!
sorry but we’re for democracy here ===
Again, I think there is something I typed that was misunderstood... this is a very old picture, BTW...:)
ping
So what is the Bush Doctrine?
MoveOn hates her, so do the Democrat party controlled media.
Ditto for the muslim leaning socialist European crowd.
She has driven DU off the deep end.
Now Pravda weighs in with their hate.
What’s not to love about Gov. Palin?
Review my post #37 and his post #47 in response on this thread.
Also if she had said she supported the “Bush Doctrine” that would have played right into Obamas hand.
OK people why in the world would anyone think the Democrats are liked by Commies.
The Democrats like to sit down and negotiate with the wonderfull Communist leaders. They love to ask for “little” favors like not putting up a nasty defense shield and tell me they have no plans to attack anyone.
Democrats will believe Communists Rebublicans FIGHT communists.
OK then which cowardly US president couldn’t stand up to CUBA and not return someone to a dictotor from the USA? Clinton gave in to castro’s demands and sent ARMED GUNMAN to assult a home! If Clinton wouldn’t stand up to Cuba would barry stand up against Russia? NO! An attorney general with respect of the Constitution wouldn’t send in a goon squad.
http://www.nocaptionneeded.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/elian2.gif
In post #29 above I referred him to another thread where you and I had an exchange to provide him with evidence that you are not a Russian or Russian sympathizer troll.
WTF are they talking about?
Troll baby.
Greta! Now ad makers can add the Russki comments to those of Obama as opponents!
> An attorney general with respect of the Constitution
> wouldn’t send in a goon squad.
At least the Evian raid didn’t go down like Reno’s raid in Waco.
Well, I guess I need to rephrase that; by “they” I meant Russians and what I have quoted there was to show what kind of profanity and stupidity vesti.ru, being the website of Russian central TV network subjects their citizens to... that's all. By no means that was meant to demonstrate that there is any credibility behind that story... merely to illustrate the way Russian propaganda works, in continuation of the stupidity of an article, which was also posted for the same reason I am sure...
and to cast all remaining doubts away, I am ACTUALLY GEORGIAN!:)
Cheers, folks
Using undefined pronouns can lead to confusion on what point is being made. Thanks for the clarification.
Just signed on in August?===
and now that I understand your concerns and question, indeed, I signed in for this website when a got a referal from a friend of mine during those tough days of war... if you need further proof of my true intentions, please search for an article that starts with “Russia claims” and see my exchange with someone named RusIvan... can also talk to MarMema, mick or JeffHead here...
Sorry folks, there much have been an honest mistake here...
Using undefined pronouns can lead to confusion on what point is being made. Thanks for the clarification.===
Sure - I used “they” only because it was in response to the original article (Pravda) and also because I have previously exchanged with the author of the post...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
