Posted on 09/15/2008 5:53:27 PM PDT by Libloather
How would Jill Greenberg really know what is and what is not 'professional'?
I liked her monkey portraits until I found out she photoshopped them to look more human.
This is typical. Typical. It should not surprise anyone, and if anyone is unsophisticated here, it is this idiot Greenberg. Can’t keep her mouth shut. This is what usually gives liberals away when they lie or deceive. Their lips move.
Oh, I am sure she will get lots of libs who want to use her, but NORMAL people and institutions will avoid her like the plague.
Being professional means that you do a PROFESSIONAL job no matter the race, color, creed or politics of the subject. If you cannot do that, you don’t take the job, period.
One out of three at the Atlantic with some professional morals. Not a good sign for journalism.
Translated: 100% of those involved in the writing/photography for the story were biased against McCain.
33% of those involved in the total story had morals, i.e. the editor Bennett.
66% had no morals.
A sad day for journalism, but I’ve been saying that every day since I got into journalism, 48 years ago.
Jeffrey Goldberg, who wrote the article mentioned above in the Atlantic, also wrote the following article where he blames a multitude of social ills on Walmart and the free enterprise system: The Crappiest Walmart in America
I think that was very much the point of the exercise. Your comment confuses me, but thanks for the edification that this is the same woman. She’s very talented but obviously tainted by the usual deranged liberalism.
One out of three at the Atlantic with some professional morals. Not a good sign for journalism.
Translated: 100% of those involved in the writing/photography for the story were biased against McCain.
33% of those involved in the total story had morals, i.e. the editor Bennett.
66% had no morals.
A sad day for journalism, but I’ve been saying that every day since I got into journalism, 48 years ago.
But Bennet was appalled by Greenberg saying she tried to portray McCain in an unflattering way. ‘We feel totally blind-sided,’ he said. ‘Her behavior is outrageous. Incredibly unprofessional.’
In other words, “We did not notice that she portrayed him in an unflattering way, but now that she’s gone public, we are outraged that she spilled the beans. A true professional would have kept this a secret.”
Despicable. Jill Greenberg is despicable.
She’s also the same photographer who made taunted kids to make them cry in order to photograph crying children. To me that is actually a whole lot worse than this.
James Bennet is a LIAR or an IDIOT!! He thought the pics were OK...even the one he picked??? What an ass BOTH of them....Jill Greenberg AND BENNET!
It’s the gloating about such things that will sink Obama. It’s not Obama’s doing, but his supporters will lose this election for him.
I don't know about 'professional' but she has done beautiful work photographing the larger monkeys and orangutans. The portraits are really quite extraordinary. Perhaps she should stick to something she knows best?
Regards,
GtG
here is Jill Greenbergs stupid site http://www.manipulator.com/
I did see that picture of a child crying at the end of the Glenn Beck show on t.v. tonight. The explanation was Jill Greenberg gave the child candy, then took it away to elicit tears and then started snapping pictures.
There are way too many Americans devaluing the lives of the rest of us with deceit/lies.
Despicable. Jill Greenberg is despicable.
So click at your own risk:McCain and the Legion of Doom
She should get a Triumph of the Will propaganda award. She must have studied Nazi and Commie propaganda techniques well. They ARE taught such tricks by the “masters” in higher education.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.