Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barr Files Suit To Remove Obama And McCain From Texas Ballot
Austin American Statesman ^ | 9/16/08 | scott shepard

Posted on 09/16/2008 4:43:54 PM PDT by pissant

Libertarian presidential nominee Bob Barr’s campaign filed suit Tuesday seeking to remove Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama from the ballot in Texas, alleging that the two major candidates missed the deadline for officially filing to be on the ballot.

The lawsuit by the former Republican congressman from Georgia claims that neither McCain nor Obama met the requirement of Texas law that all candidates provide “written certification” of their nomination “before 5 p.m. on the 70th day before election day” because neither had been formally nominated by their respective parties in time.

That would have been Aug. 25. Obama did not accept his party’s nomination until Aug. 28, McCain his on Sept. 4.

The lawsuit states: “The hubris of the major parties has risen to such a level that they do not believe that the election laws of the State of Texas apply to them.”

Pat Dixon, chairman of the Texas Libertarian Party, issued a statement saying, “Libertarian principles require personal responsibility for your acts and failures. Obama and McCain failed to meet the deadlines. They must follow the law like everyone else.”

(Excerpt) Read more at statesman.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aclu; bobbarr; electionpresident; judiciary; lawsuit; libertarianparty; lp; mccain; mccainpalin; obama; obamabiden; patdixon; pathetic; professionalspoilers; sideshowbob; texasballot; thirdparty; tx2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last
To: pissant

Sorry, the meds kicked in a little early today. ;-)


41 posted on 09/16/2008 5:09:31 PM PDT by doc1019 (Obama IS running against Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
"Excuse my ignorance … how does this benefit Obama?"

Little slow today?

McCain Owns Texas; Obummer has no chance.

42 posted on 09/16/2008 5:10:15 PM PDT by editor-surveyor ( If Obama had Palin's resume and experience Obama would be qualified to be VP too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Imagine if you had a job where you can run around the country blabbing about whatever and have people throw money at you and feed your ego.

You do know candidates can not legally keep donated money or spend it on themselves, right? It is not like Barr or whatever candidate (including McCain and Obama) is going to take a Hawaiian vacation with their respective remaining donated money after the election.

43 posted on 09/16/2008 5:11:18 PM PDT by Night Conservative (Sarah Palin for Vice President in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I don’t understand why libertarians don’t work within the Republican party. The two parties are natural allies and compliment each other. If the Republican Party can have moderates and religious conservatives, then they surely can have libertarian Republicans.


44 posted on 09/16/2008 5:11:45 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

No problem. I’m about to have my first dose of medicine tonight, in the form of a 12oz brew.


45 posted on 09/16/2008 5:11:47 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: pissant

What would stop voters from writing in McCain or Obama? Even if the lawsuit were successful which is highly unlikely, McCain would still carry the state with the write-in votes. It would just take Texas a long time to count the ballots.


46 posted on 09/16/2008 5:11:47 PM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
"Excuse my ignorance … how does this benefit Obama?"

It removes one of the biggest, surest blocs of electoral votes from the McCain column. It disproportionately hurts McCain.
47 posted on 09/16/2008 5:14:38 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast ([Fred Thompson/Clarence Thomas 2008!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Night Conservative
You do know candidates can not legally keep donated money or spend it on themselves, right?

Of course, I have very intimate knowledge of this- however, I also know that you can file flights, hotels, meals, some entertainment, etc all as campaign expenses. You can basically live high off the hog for months all on your donor's dime, then, if you have anything left, move it into a personal PAC account and file similar expenses for PAC 'activities'. They don't need to take a Hawaiian 'vacation', they can claim it is a campaign or PAC related event, live just like it was a vacation, but expense it against the campaign.

48 posted on 09/16/2008 5:15:45 PM PDT by mnehring (Maverick/Barracuda 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

Texas is red, it is in the bag for McCain, Obama wasn’t going to get those electoral votes, anyway. Can McCain win without Texas’ EVs?


49 posted on 09/16/2008 5:16:09 PM PDT by sportutegrl (0bi has been looking a little wan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Must suck to be a member of a Party that doesn't even know how to work around red tape.

Actually it must suck to be the head of a party and be dumber than a box of rocks. Barr looks like a complete idiot for not researching this before filing.

50 posted on 09/16/2008 5:16:20 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

In Texas you have to file to be a write in candidate too.


51 posted on 09/16/2008 5:17:08 PM PDT by mnehring (Maverick/Barracuda 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Night Conservative
You're the one who said Barr should play by the rules.

Because the rules in Texas say you have to file by the 26 or file an extension- the extension is part of the rules. Barr is challenging that part of the rule.

52 posted on 09/16/2008 5:19:43 PM PDT by mnehring (Maverick/Barracuda 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pissant

LOL! Have one for me. ;-)


53 posted on 09/16/2008 5:21:56 PM PDT by doc1019 (Obama IS running against Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Elitist gun grabber, fraud.

Uh, Barr used to sit on the board of the NRA. He's about as anti-gun as Annie Oakley.

54 posted on 09/16/2008 5:22:56 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Go ahead, piss off Texas.

I double dog dare you.


55 posted on 09/16/2008 5:26:51 PM PDT by Gator113 (Drill here, drill now...... or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Wow, he must really want Obama to win. Never would have thought that of Bob Barr. See, drop McCain and Obama from Texas, and what happens? McCain can’t get the 270 electoral votes to win, since most polls show Texas is firmly McCain’s. Obama, on the other hand, CAN be projected to win without Texas, if the breaks go his way in toss-up states. So all Barr accomplishes with this is basically making it easier for Obama to win. Nice move!


56 posted on 09/16/2008 5:40:07 PM PDT by cincinnati65 (Lucky participant in 189 different Nigerian business deals......still waiting on payment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Barr is not only a nut and an idiot but he’s embarrassing himself.”

If you will permit me, I beg to differ. I know what you are trying to say, but I think that in THIS case, Barr is so enamored of his own supposed intelligence that he cannot be embarassed. Did you ever know someone who was SO stupid that no matter what you said to them you could not insult them? That’s Barr. He’s a legend in his own mind!


57 posted on 09/16/2008 5:40:12 PM PDT by Tucker39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I don’t understand why libertarians don’t work within the Republican party.

They do. It's called the Republican Liberty Caucus.


It is the "Big ell" Libertarian Party that thinks the two major parties are actual one group called "Republicrats" or "Demopublicans."
58 posted on 09/16/2008 5:43:39 PM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

I agree with you and acknowledged it in #40. You said it better in saying he’s a legend in his own mind.


59 posted on 09/16/2008 5:47:52 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Too bad he did not file suit to have them removed from the Illinois ballot.


60 posted on 09/16/2008 5:51:33 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson