[GOPsterinMA]

We’re waiting...

[bahblahbah]

The McCain campaign won’t touch nor should they... btw the focus should be broad and not just rev wright... it should include some of the other characters or talk about how Obama got them money...

[Onerom99]

http://www.nysun.com/national/mccain-to-go-negative-in-stretch/86407/

The McCain campaign is gearing up to criticize Senator Obama for his past associations with the Reverend Jeremiah Wright and a former Weather Underground operative, William Ayers, in the home stretch of the presidential race.

[Prophet in the wilderness]

I hope someone has more damming video of Rev ( Chickens coming home to roost ) Wright that would have both Rev Wright and Obama together.

[Para-Ord.45]

Right now Obama has the wind at his back and the sails are full.

It isn`t that his radical left wing policy ideas are correct or valid, it is because Joe and Jane sixpack just like his answers. Or more specifically, the way he talks and comports himself. The Joe sixpacks vote based on the way they ‘FEEL’ and not the issues.

Based on the debate and the slickness of his answers aka nuance, it seems he can verbally slither out of any accusations.

[july4thfreedomfoundation]

Wright saying “God Damn America” is not going to fly with white, pro-American democrats in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, or any other of the battleground states.

Obama will flip out when (and if) the Wright ads hit the airwaves.

[shield]

bfl

[samtheman]

The most destructive issue against Obama is Jeremiah Wright.

It's so sad, so pathetic, that you think that, that we would be reduced to thinking that.

Obama is up to his eye-balls in financial-meltdown culpability and John "Chicken" McCain doesn't want to call him on it.

So we're reduced to dragging out the ole Jeremiah Wright rag doll and dangling that before the crowd.

How sad.

How pathetic.

And I thought McCain was a fighter.

I was so, so wrong.

[Cringing Negativism Network]

Speaking of questions: WHERE’S SARAH PALIN?

Stop hiding Sarah Palin!

[hampdenkid]

The most damning footage of the wrong Rev. Wright is the footage that hasn’t nearly been shown enough and should be shown non-stop from now until Nov. 4: the footage of him bellowing and performing doggie style sex on Monica Lewinsky from the pulpit of his renegade church. Any man who would let his daughters be exposed to that maniacal behavior is not fit to be a father, let alone President.

[TheRedSoxWinThePennant]

I still think it will be Ayers

[1066AD]

I think Wright has another book due out any day now.

[MittFan08]

I’m sure Wright will be brought out big time if the polls stay the way they are now. There’s a good chance it could backfire with the economy being as bad as it is, but if it looks like we’re going lose anyway, you do what you have to do. It’s a legitimate topic to bring up, the only problem is that everyone knows about it already. Things like this are obviously more effective if people haven’t processed the info already. But I’m sure it will be tried.

[nathanbedford]

Here is a post which I published earlier this morning. I think it is responsive and in many way is anticipates what you have written in your vanity.

If nothing else, the first debate of 2008 proved that Senator Obama is an inexperienced amateur who does not understand the essentials necessary for the job he is seeking.

That statement betrays the author's basic misunderstanding of Obama and, unfortunately, the great strategic error of the McCain campaign.

; The fundamental flaw in Obama which disqualifies him from being president of the United States is not his inexperience-although that is a major negative-it is his ideology.

Obama is not stupid and not inarticulate. He proved in the debate that he can operate adequately without a Teleprompter. By the same test, McCain often got lost in the thickets of his own rhetoric. So long as the threshold test for Obama to become president of the United States is whether he looks amateurish or presidential, Obama will become president of the United States. Both the author and the McCain campaign are fighting a battle they cannot win.

Obama's disqualification for the office comes from his stealthy attachments to his radical ideology. Everything about Obama can be explained, not by amateurism, inarticulateness, or inexperience, but by his extreme leftist world view. For example, Obama's original resistance to the Iraqi war comes not as he claimed in the debate from concerns about war aims, doubts about the actual presence of WMDs, or the absence of an exit strategy, his resistance came as a reflex of his ideology. These radicals do not want America to succeed anywhere militarily. They believe every American military operation is morally wrong and likely to impede the progress of world socialism. The same ideological reflex prevented Obama from supporting the surge and later from acknowledging its success. It is ideology, not inexperience, which drives Obama's worldview. It is ideology, not inexperience, which explains him. It is in his ideology that he must be exposed.

Obama's best score of the night occurred when he lectured McCain about McCain's false assumptions leading into the war. This in response to an attack that Obama was amateurish. In a stroke, Obama turned the tables on McCain, obliterated the argument that he was inexperienced, and converted it into an argument that Obama's judgment was superior to McCain's. We conservatives can argue with the substance of Obama's claims, but for the undecideds and independents who will decide this election, the round clearly went to Obama and perhaps the whole war because they immediately concluded that he was not too inexperienced to be commander in chief. The whole McCain campaign strategy died right there.

As long as the campaign is fought along the lines that Obama is too inexperienced to be president of the United States, rather than ideologically disqualified, Obama stands to win the election because voters will simply say I have seen Senator Obama in the debates and I choose to believe my own eyes.

On the other hand, if the campaign against Obama is designed to expose him as a stealth radical it will be persuasive because all the pieces of Obama's life and career fit. There is not a single public policy position that Obama has taken-at least prior to his flip-flopping after gaining the nomination-which cannot be explained by Saul Alinsky and even that tactic is provided for in the Alinsky playbook.

The author points out that McCain branded Obama and the debate as, "naïve and dangerous". Obama is certainly dangerous but he is not naïve, he is a committed one world statist. He does not commit, for example, to meet with dictators without preconditions because he is naïve, he wants to meet with him so he can cut deals with them. The people are not much worried about an inexperienced president who has good intentions because they know he has an army of advisers and wise old man around him. They have heard that rap every election about every candidate. On the other hand, they will not tolerate a facile man with bad intentions.

McCain is essentially running on integrity expressed in patriotism. He is trying to defeat a patriot with better ideas. Let him run against a man whose bad ideas make him unpatriotic.

On issue after issue Obama is vulnerable on his ideology. It should not be difficult to tie every one of his policy positions to standard Marxist- Alinsky rhetoric. Of course, when is undertaken the cries from the left of "McCarthyism" will be deafening. Let them shriek, they will be howling on the defensive. In politics, like war, one is either on the defensive or on offense. Politics and wars are lost on defense.

The alternative in a democrat year, in a season of change, during potentially the greatest economic threat ever to confront the Republic, is to pursue a strategy that cannot win because nobody cares.

[Salman]

Just remember one thing folks.

Jeremiah Wright's style of preaching may be black, but his theology is "mainstream liberal Protestant".

[devolve]

[BIGLOOK]

Aloha J!

Wright certainly seems a prime target but so is Rezco and ACORN and Michelle.

Rezco is singing, ACORN under indictment and Michelle is in hiding.

Then there's the lawsuit over Obama's vetting, Larry Sinclair, Frank Marshal Davis, Ray Kakugawa, Louis Farrakhan.........

So many choices.....so little time.

[GitmoSailor]

What Bracelet??????....

[bmwcyle]

Only the American voter can do it. They might be too stupid.