Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Estimates show Palin assets top $1 million
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081001/ap_on_el_pr/palins_finances ^ | SHARON THEIMER and BRETT J. BLACKLEDGE, Associated Press SOBs

Posted on 10/01/2008 4:51:08 PM PDT by Charles Bronson Forever

WASILLA, Alaska - Sarah Palin and her husband have pieced together a uniquely Alaskan income that reached comfortably into six figures even before she became governor, capitalizing on valuable fishing rights, a series of land deals and a patchwork of other ventures to build an above-average lifestyle.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: mccain; millionaires; palin; palinrecord; wasilla
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Charles Bronson Forever

They did everything they could to bump the number, too. They even tracked down a $16.50 dividend: “Sarah Palin reported Todd Palin collecting $266 and each child $21 in dividends last year from BBNC, and a total of $16.50 from Choggiung Limited.”

Wow! Did they break into their home and check the kids’ piggybanks? /SPIT


41 posted on 10/01/2008 5:27:36 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS
How are ya, folks. I wanna apologize for the string of "vanity" posts that I've twirled around Free Republic lately. You know me, I love sequels. I'll tone it down. But not because of you. Or McCain. Or Obama. But for Palin. I love that woman; she reminds of my dear wife Jill ( who portrayed the First Lady in "Assassination," now out on DVD from MGM). Take it easy, folks. And remember: lock and load.
42 posted on 10/01/2008 5:28:49 PM PDT by Charles Bronson Forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Charles Bronson Forever

Good for her!


43 posted on 10/01/2008 5:32:22 PM PDT by humblegunner (If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Bronson Forever

so they made money through their small business and todd working a blue collar job. this is suppose to be negative???

what the heck


44 posted on 10/01/2008 5:33:04 PM PDT by BooyahPower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Bronson Forever
As I posted in another thread, this piece is outrageous. The opening paragraph is made to sound as if the Palins are really rich and she was just lying and faking it when she called herself "Joe Six Pack." But then when you continue and read it all the way to the end you realize that they are basing their claim that she's "rich" on the value of her property (and as we all know, owning a McMansion is no longer a true wealth indicator). Her husband built their current house on land they purchased by a lake. They're still paying down their mortgage. Most of her "$1 million" asset value comes from this lakefront property. They also have two little cottages - one of them is a little shack up in the area where they travel every year for their fishing business.

Continue reading the article and it's stated that the Palins' property and income are similar to most Alaskans. Most Alaskans own lots of land and have hunting cottages dotted all over the place. In a state the size of California, Texas, and Montana combined with a population of roughly 600,000 -- purchasing large swaths of land is not unusual!

You also learn that most Alaskans have small aircrafts to travel around in because there are many areas that cannot be accessed by roads, and you also learn that Todd Palin inherited his 1958 plane (the red Piper Super Cub seen in all the pictures), and it's been in his family for 20 years and is worth less than what these "journalists" paid for their Lexuses.

These "journalists" have basically run what is called a "wealth assessment" on the Palins. I worked in nonprofit, I know about research and wealth profiles. The profile issued here would not classify the Palins as "major gift" donor potential. They're comfortably upper middle class.

How do I know this? Well, because the bottom line is how much they make a year, and the fact is that the Palins make what Obama and Biden would consider middle class incomes. And that's not even factoring in the very real cost of living difference between Alaska and the rest of the country. Alaska has one of the highest, if not the highest, cost of living in the nation due to heating expenses. $200K a year in Alaska is like $140K in Ohio or Indiana. Either way, according to Obama's plan, they wouldn't be taxed because they're considered "middle class".

These "journalists" are trying to discredit her middle class status because they know that it provides a powerful connection with voters. Their behavior is beyond biased; it's intellectually dishonest. They're really hoping that readers don't carefully read the entire article and think about the conclusions drawn.

45 posted on 10/01/2008 5:41:22 PM PDT by GipperGal (A Chicago lawyer who makes $5 million a year knows nothing about the middle class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redk; All
It’s not negative but they are practically screaming “hey look people she isn’t really like you”.

And they're lying about that. Please take a look at my post #45. I do wealth assessments for nonprofits. I know of what I speak when I say that the Palins are not "rich". This is totally dishonest journalism.

Again, take a look at my post #45 for my explanation.

46 posted on 10/01/2008 5:46:51 PM PDT by GipperGal (A Chicago lawyer who makes $5 million a year knows nothing about the middle class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Charles Bronson Forever

Why don’t the authors list the assets of the other 49 State Governors and their spouses?

Due to the cost of living In Alaska $1,000,000 is about equal to $500,000 in other places outside the major cities.


47 posted on 10/01/2008 5:49:01 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Will Rogers: Every law Congress makes is a joke and every joke they tell becomes a law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Bronson Forever

She never had to buy a rape kit ‘cause she owns guns.


48 posted on 10/01/2008 5:50:46 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Bronson Forever
Meanwhile...

The Washington Times reports that over the past decade, the speaker funneled $99,000 in rent, utilities and accounting charges from her political action committee to Financial Leasing Services, a real estate and investment firm owned by her husband, Paul Pelosi — a practice the House voted to ban last year with Pelosi's support (after which the bill failed in the Senate).

Since her husband became treasurer of the speaker's PAC to the Future, the payments have quadrupled, according to Federal Election Commission records.

According to the Times, the PAC's rent grew to four times what it was early this year; a Pelosi senior adviser told the paper this was due to San Francisco's expensive real estate market.

49 posted on 10/01/2008 6:07:54 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (McCAIN/PALIN...THE CHANGE AMERICANS REALLY WANT—OBAMA..THE CHANGE THE WORLD'S TERRORISTS WANT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glock19C
$1M at 44 is within the reach of most americans if they 1) graduate college, 2) make relatively few stupid mistakes.

and don't let the wrong woman get her mitts into your dough.

Maybe that was a subset of 2.

50 posted on 10/01/2008 6:08:34 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Charles Bronson Forever

In other words, she’s worth about 1/400th of what John and Terayza Kerry are worth.


51 posted on 10/01/2008 6:12:15 PM PDT by Antoninus (Ignore the polls. They're meant to shape public opinion, not measure it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Oh is John running this cycle, must have missed that
52 posted on 10/01/2008 6:13:56 PM PDT by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob
Oh is John running this cycle, must have missed that

The media only cares about personal wealth when it comes to Republicans. With Democrats, it's "feh".
53 posted on 10/01/2008 6:39:19 PM PDT by Antoninus (Ignore the polls. They're meant to shape public opinion, not measure it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: GipperGal

“And they’re lying about that. Please take a look at my post #45. I do wealth assessments for nonprofits. I know of what I speak when I say that the Palins are not “rich”. This is totally dishonest journalism.”

I know. I was just saying while it isn’t and outright smear it is an attempt to take away the connection she has with people. Of course it won’t really work but nothing else has so they have to try this now.


54 posted on 10/01/2008 7:00:56 PM PDT by redk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Charles Bronson Forever
Does anyone have accurate info as to how Obama accumulated his fortune of many millions??
55 posted on 10/01/2008 7:53:13 PM PDT by elpadre (nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Bronson Forever

I didn’t go through the articles closely, they’re so insinuating and dumb—but was there anywhere mentioned about what kind of a mortgage she holds on the place? They act as if she owns everything outright.


56 posted on 10/05/2008 4:05:46 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson