Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California approves Occidental Long Beach drilling
Oil & Gas Journal ^ | Sept. 30, 2008 | Eric Watkins, Oil Diplomacy Editor

Posted on 10/02/2008 1:16:36 PM PDT by thackney

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has signed legislation enabling future oil exploration and drilling in Wilmington oil field in Long Beach.

Under Bill 2165, California's State Lands Commission can negotiate a contract with the city and Occidental Petroleum Corp. to explore and develop the western end of Wilmington field, which includes tidelands mineral deposits.

In the past, California shouldered most costs for previous oil efforts in the tidelands deposits, but Occidental offered to take on that role in exchange for a larger share of the potential revenues—an offer that required the new legislation.

Occidental spokesman Richard Kline said the Los Angeles-based firm needs a new contract with more financial incentives to make the Wilmington deal worthwhile. The current agreement gives 95% of revenue to the state and 5% to Occidental—too little to allow the firm to recover its investment.

Altogether, Occidental is expected to invest more than $200 million to increase production by injecting water, carbon dioxide, or other material into some of the field's estimated 500-700 existing wells. Occidental would also drill as many as 200 new wells, Kline said.

Bill 2165 does not allow for offshore drilling or expansion of the existing drilling area. According to officials, Occidental would use directional drilling techniques to reach beneath the port's tidelands, increasing output by as much as 63%.

Long Beach city analysts say that under the agreement with Occidental, reserves could rise by 22 million bbl from the current 35 million bbl in the West Wilmington unit, where the new drilling is planned.

Any drilling must also comply with existing regulations of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, as well as the California Environmental Quality Act.

Wilmington, which produces about 8,500 b/d, is California's sixth largest oilfield. It has produced more than 2.5 billion bbl since 1932, when General Petroleum, an antecedent of ExxonMobil Corp., drilled the first well.

Last year, it was reported that the central area of Wilmington field is in the midst of a redevelopment project over the next few years, with Los Angeles city authorities approving the drilling of as many as 540 directional oil and water injection wells from central facilities


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: energy; occidentalpetroleum; oil; oxy; richardkline
Again:

Bill 2165 does not allow for offshore drilling or expansion of the existing drilling area.

1 posted on 10/02/2008 1:16:36 PM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

I was involved in the abandoning of the Wilmington field. We left a lot of oil there.


2 posted on 10/02/2008 1:19:51 PM PDT by edcoil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
That seemed to happen a lot in the last century.

Plus new technology can recover oil that back then no one had any idea was recoverable.

“Reserves” keep increasing with new methods of extraction and exploration.

3 posted on 10/02/2008 1:27:26 PM PDT by Syncro (Tagline: optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Isn’t Occidental the company Gore has stock in?


4 posted on 10/02/2008 1:30:54 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Does Al Gore still own a piece of this?


5 posted on 10/02/2008 1:31:36 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

$850,000 gifted from Armand Hammer. Which went up when Clinton gave them the Elk Head Strategic Oil Reserves.
Hell of a Carbon Footprint, ain’t it?


6 posted on 10/02/2008 1:56:06 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

$850,000 gifted from Armand Hammer. Which went up when Clinton gave them the Elk Head Strategic Oil Reserves.
Hell of a Carbon Footprint, ain’t it?


7 posted on 10/02/2008 1:56:17 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

How many years will it take to get the permits approved. Right now, I hear it’s three years. That’s why they say it could take 5 years before you see any production.


8 posted on 10/02/2008 2:00:21 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2

I am not familiar with the legal process for drilling in California.


9 posted on 10/02/2008 2:47:10 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RC2

The environmentalist lawsuits will add another 15 years, until Oxy gives it up as hopeless.


10 posted on 10/02/2008 2:53:02 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson