Posted on 10/10/2008 10:31:07 AM PDT by Chet 99
That said, I think too that the polls are misunderestimating the actual turnout of GOP voters this time around. Governor Palin has energized the base and those not energized by her are scared to death of Obama. 1994 redux, perhaps. Hope springs eternal and time will tell...
Thanks. . . that helps.
Why THANK YOU!...that made me feel better....I’m weak...I need daily reminders that the polls are crap....
The absolute best news I’ve seen all day !!!
Thank you for the glimmer of HOPE !!! We forget how biased and evil the polls are.
Last night on H&C, I saw the smirking Alan Colmes asking Ann Coulter if she was worried that Nobama is ahead in the polls. Coulter laughed and said that the Democrat always leads in the polls a few weeks before the election but the Republican always closes at the end. Colmes seemed to lose the smirk pretty quickly.
In question???
LMAO
How about flat out WRONG! And did Gore win the popular vote by less than 1%?
It’s always great to get some perspective.
Glad there’s someone out there that can still laugh!
Laugh or cry...I would rather laugh right now. I am being so positive as I can be. It is difficult but I STILL believe that McCain is going to be our next President with a huge Democratic Senate and House. However, I heard that McCain said that he and Sarah cannot talk about the economy because it would be a loser for them which is why they are only talking about Ayers...Do you agree with this. I don’t. I think it is imparative for both McCain and Sarah to discuss what they would do for the economy.
“Gore did not have angry, “cheated” PUMAs out to maul him...Nor was there any reason to suspect people lied about intending to vote for him (Bradley-Wilder Effect...And BHO makes algore look like a moderate. Hopeful signs?”
To be honest I think the PUMAs are less relevent than Ron Paul supporters.
I miss Ron Paul, his campaign was hilarious
. . . And there were no suspicions of Gore being a Manchurian candidate. The suspicion was mostly about whether he was Tennessean.
thanks
but unfortunately the socialist left and ACORN learned many lessons by studying the enemy’s past actions
Please see #32 - Bush v Kerry 2004
I’d like to hear him really hammer ACORN, the CRA and democrats for the subprime meltdown. He’s started doing that. I think he can get more out of that tack, though.
Was that LIKELY VOTERS??
Because Gallup is using Registered Voters.
Gallup was WRONG in 2004, they had Kerry winning by 2 in their last poll of November before the election, and Bush won by 2. WE ARE TALKING REGISTERED VOTERS!
Rasmussen was a big part of the RCP average in 2004 and he was not stacking the Dem turnout at 300% of historical averages that year. In fact, his current sampling is twice that of 2006, a year in which pubbies stayed home in droves.
bttt
The bomb has already been detonated, and it is the continuing and growing financial/stock market crises. McCain is getting blown away just as Hoover did, albeit McCain is not the sitting President as Hoover was, at the time. We are going to end up with an Ivy League Jimmy Carter, but with a much harsher 'Alinsky/Soros' set of political principles. With ACORN running elections from now on, how will the democrats ever lose another one? Obamaism will be very, very hard to overturn, no matter how he makes the recession worse and sells us out to evil, international interests (and he will do both, and much more).
The Clintons are as incapacitated by the recent course of financial events as anyone. They can't hurt Obama significantly, now, either. Perhaps Obama will assuage Hillary's hurt feelings with a Supreme Court appointment; or perhaps he will choose not to just to show the Clintons who is really running things, now.
Bump thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.