Posted on 10/10/2008 10:57:34 PM PDT by Gator_that_eats_Dems
My vote goes to the intellectually challenged who can't stop worshipping at the throne of a complete and total fraud.
McCain was the only one with a chance.
This is not about digging, it is about exposing a sleazy, short lived, one term politician.
When you find a scummy liberal, you have to make sure that he does not spend a $150,000,000 dollars to steal your goals for your nation and your fellow man.
Whom did I backstab, Bronkie ? You’re not talking about that liberal fraud who has the people of Massachusetts worshipping at the feet of Debbil Patrick ?
I wonder if Bronkie is still on Slick Willard’s payroll. ;-)
Nope...and the only reason McCain is doing as well as he is can be credited to Palin and Obama himself! Romney wouldnt have picked Palin and actually may be doing a lot worse.
Would he have made the mistakes McCain has? Romney is a fighter so I guess we will never know.
“Romney is a fighter “
For what? Homosexuals in the military, abortion, anti-second amendment, illegal aliens, planned parenthood fundraising.
God knows what he did in those four short years when he governed, although he did appoint 75% democrat Judges.
I honestly think McCain should mention that he will appoint Romney as Economic Guru to help put economy back in order and Guiliani Attorney General who took on the mob and now will take on “crooked washington insiders and wall street” etc...
None of the other guys, as VP or Pres, would have energized the base like McCain’s pick of Palin. We would not be seeing 10,000 in attendance at rallies if Palin was not on the ticket, and McCain was the only one with the chutzpah to pick her. So at least we have the majority of the base, )but only because of Palin), which we would not have if Guiliani, Huckabee, or Romney were President or VP. That MHO.
Were you using another name before the "Not a Purge" purge?
I just wish John McCain would open his mouth and Newt Gingrich’s words would come out. Newt is so logical and such an effective communicator. He outlines what to do in easily understandable steps. he would wipe the floor with Mr. vague generality Obama.
Second, Romney destroyed the economic miracle of Massachusetts
BEFORE he tanked the state with his socialized medicine.
Romney wiped out Massachusetts.
Romney was rated a "C" overall by Cato. Here are the facts.
As U.S. real output grew 13 percent between 2002 and 2006, Massachusetts trailed at 9 percent.
* Manufacturing employment fell 7 percent nationwide those years, but sank 14 percent under Romney, placing Massachusetts 48th among the states.
* Between fall 2003 and autumn 2006, U.S. job growth averaged 5.4 percent, nearly three times Massachusetts' anemic 1.9 percent pace.
* While 8 million Americans over age 16 found work between 2002 and 2006, the number of employed Massachusetts residents actually declined by 8,500 during those years.
"Massachusetts was the only state to have failed to post any gain in its pool of employed residents," professors Sum and McLaughlin concluded.
In an April 2003 meeting with the Massachusetts congressional delegation in Washington, Romney failed to endorse President Bush's $726 billion tax-cut proposal.
[Cato Institute annual Fiscal Policy Report Card - America's Governors, 2004.]
No thanks.
Rudy McRombee.
Too bad they aren’t all 1 man.
“The “purists” are in charge, and don’t forget it.””
The MCCAIN RINO PURISTS? From what planet do you hail?
You seem to think Romeny lost cause he’s a Mormom, BS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.