Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Endorsements, opinions flourish in Quebec (Canadian Federal Elections!)
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) ^ | 10/13/08 | Corinne Smith - Staff Reporter

Posted on 10/13/2008 12:21:04 PM PDT by MplsSteve

To the surprise of nobody, many endorsements and opinions in Quebec have been voiced during this federal election campaign, with Conservative Leader Stephen Harper's campaign being one of the central targets.

In our effort to give readers a taste of what is being said in the province, we did stumble on one surprise: an influential newspaper that picked none of the parties nor leaders running for office, perhaps a telling sign of a campaign that's done little to impress.

Quebec's esteemed newspaper of record La Presse did just that this week, in what editor-in-chief André Pratte called a "sad realization."

"None of the federal parties has proven it is really ready to govern the country in this period of economic incertitude," Pratte wrote on Oct. 9.

Editorial boards traditionally back a party and leader at the tail end of any political campaign, making their case based on performance, platform, past policies and posterity.

La Presse backed Harper's Conservatives in 2006, hoping that once in office, the new Tories would prove moderate, sensitive to the majority's wishes, and faithful to Canadian values.

"Unfortunately, on many fronts, the Harper government has profoundly disappointed us; the Conservatives definitely do not deserve the majority they hoped for at the start of the campaign," Pratte said.

The Tories scored some points in Quebec while in office — addressing the so-called fiscal imbalance and the Québécois as a nation motion are accomplishments repeatedly trotted out to prove Harper's commitment to the province.

But on other fronts — greenhouse gas emissions, lowering the GST, cabinet minister problems, foreign policy — the Conservatives have shown "a rare incompetence," Pratte said.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbc.ca ...


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; nationalism; quebec
As most Freepers know, Canada is holding their parliamentary elections tomorrow. The early polling showed the Conservatives with a strong chance of winning a majority in the House of Commons - but recent polls show Canadians re-electing a Conservative minority govt again.

For reasons I've never been too sure of, I have followed Quebec's political scene for a number of years. It was here (in '06) that the Tories picked up a number of seats that lead to them taking control of the House of Commons.

One thing I do understand about Quebec politics is that there seems to be an eternally dissatisfied group of voters and a conflicted group at that. They continually elect BQ and PQ members to the House of Commons and provincial parliament - but can't ever agree on whether they want to leave Canada or not (1980 and 1995 referendums). And now (if the CBC is reporting this story correctly), they seem to be disenchanted with Stephen Harper's leadership.

Anyone want to weigh in on this? Any serious insights would be appreciated!

1 posted on 10/13/2008 12:21:06 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
Anyone want to weigh in on this? Any serious insights would be appreciated!

With the Gang of Four (well, 3 and a bit) banging away at Harper, along with their media wing (except National Post) I'm hoping ...

Harper's doing a rope-a-dope -- saying he's going to get another minority government, while actually having some polls showing he has a good chance at a majority....

and letting Canadian voters take a hard look at the Four Stooges and the economy, take a deep breath, and push Harper across.

This is series.
2 posted on 10/13/2008 12:45:36 PM PDT by caveat emptor (Don't blame me. I voted for McCain/Palin and Harper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Canada PING?


3 posted on 10/13/2008 7:19:38 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve; GMMAC; Clive; exg; kanawa; backhoe; -YYZ-; Former Proud Canadian; Squawk 8888; ...
Thanks for the ping, MplsSteve.


4 posted on 10/14/2008 4:18:34 AM PDT by fanfan (SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Good luck to you folks up there in Canada! We may need to be asking for political asylum up there in the very near future.


5 posted on 10/14/2008 4:40:48 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (White Trash for Sarah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: caveat emptor

I don’t think the point of calling the election was to gain a majority; they knew from the beginning that it was even odds at best. The real purpose was to bankrupt the Liberal Party, already in dire financial straits before the writ was dropped. We’ll see another minority that is effectively unstoppable because the Libs will have no money to fight another election anytime soon and will probably be embroiled in a leadership fight.


6 posted on 10/14/2008 4:47:02 AM PDT by Squawk 8888 (TSA and DHS are jobs programs for people who are not smart enough to flip burgers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

Thank you very much Lucius.

I think McCain will win too.

There is a live thread in breaking, if you want to follow along, but we don’t expect too much news before 8pm or so, with official totals coming after 10pm. EST.


7 posted on 10/14/2008 4:47:45 AM PDT by fanfan (SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

No exit polls?


8 posted on 10/14/2008 4:56:30 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (White Trash for Sarah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

No exit polls.


9 posted on 10/14/2008 4:59:46 AM PDT by fanfan (SCC:Canadians have constitutional protection to all opinions, as long as they are based on the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

You may be partly right; I expect we’ll know what the new government looks like within 24 hours. As to “real purposes” and who knew what, when, we may never know.


10 posted on 10/14/2008 9:28:16 AM PDT by caveat emptor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson