Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush signs RIAA-backed intellectual-property law
CNET | 10/13/08 | Stephanie Condon

Posted on 10/13/2008 6:37:54 PM PDT by Santa Fe_Conservative

President Bush on Monday signed into law an intellectual-property enforcement bill that would consolidate federal efforts to combat copyright infringement under a new White House cabinet position.

The Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act establishes within the executive branch the position of intellectual property enforcement coordinator, who will be appointed by the president.

The law also steepens penalties for intellectual-property infringement, and increases resources for the Department of Justice to coordinate for federal and state efforts against counterfeiting and piracy. The so-called Pro-IP Act passed unanimously in the Senate last month and received strong bipartisan support in the House.

The Bush administration initially expressed its opposition to the legislation, but one of its more contentious provisions, which would have allowed the Justice Department to pursue civil litigation against copyright infringers, was removed.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; biggovernment; billsigning; bush; copyright; copyrightczar; intellectualproperty; ip; riaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
From another article I found here :

The RIAA voiced its support for the bill. "This bill truly is music to the ears of all those who care about strengthening American creativity and jobs," Mitch Bainwol, chairman and chief executive of the RIAA, said in a statement.

Oh brother...big brother I mean...

1 posted on 10/13/2008 6:37:54 PM PDT by Santa Fe_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

I wonder if the idiot even knew what he signed.


2 posted on 10/13/2008 6:40:30 PM PDT by WackySam (The Constitution is not an a la carte menu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative
I'm not going to miss President Bush, at all.

....until 4 months into the Obama presidency.

3 posted on 10/13/2008 6:42:58 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (By Obama's own reckoning, isn't Lyndon LaRouche more qualified? He's run since the 70's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative
Funny, I may have left the URL address blank. Oops! The CNET article
4 posted on 10/13/2008 6:42:58 PM PDT by Santa Fe_Conservative (The RINOs think that they have won but we shall see who has the last laugh in '08...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

Looks like the RIAA got a good return on their investment.


5 posted on 10/13/2008 6:43:22 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

Crap. This is probably riddled with loopholes for all sorts of stuff P2Pers have been fighting against for years.


6 posted on 10/13/2008 6:44:15 PM PDT by TheZMan (Bitter backwoods east Texan Christian gun clinger with the AC at 72 degrees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce; bamahead

It seems, whenever I ping both of you guys, it’s always bad news?...


7 posted on 10/13/2008 6:44:37 PM PDT by KoRn (Barack Obama Must Be Stopped!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

Okay, you got me. This is another satire post, right?


8 posted on 10/13/2008 6:44:49 PM PDT by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative
The law also steepens penalties for intellectual-property infringement

And this is a bad thing because...?

9 posted on 10/13/2008 6:49:00 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Intelligent comments only, please; those responding from emotion will be ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

LMAO!!


10 posted on 10/13/2008 6:51:31 PM PDT by Galleta (McCain & Palin "Change You Won't Regret")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

With the kind of crap today being passed off as “music” someone would have to put a gun to my head and make me download it.


11 posted on 10/13/2008 6:59:04 PM PDT by tobyhill (If you don't give to the ghetto, the ghetto will take from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
While I'm not sure if this bill contains this part of the law, the RIAA has been wanting to prevent people from downloading music from CDs onto their iPods or other MP# plays, or even their computers.

The way the RIAA has operated is through third-party enforcers. An individual shows up at a bar, with ID, and askes to see your licensing for all the music you are playing. For example, at a friends bar, she playing CDs she had purchased legally on a stereo she had purchased legally, and ended up paying RIAA $20,000 to clear up the legal mess. The guy with the ID got 10% of the take.

12 posted on 10/13/2008 6:59:14 PM PDT by Military family member (GO Colts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

Unconstitutional. Executive orders. Fair use. Utter unconstitional rubbish bought by Big Media.

And don’t expect the creators or their heirs to see a dime from this.


13 posted on 10/13/2008 7:06:57 PM PDT by weegee (In 2006 the Democrats took over Congress. 9% approval, $4gal gas, economy tanked. Had enuff CHANGE?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Military family member

Yet another reason to dj from vinyl. They are too dumb to know when something is a grey market repress or licensed reissue. But computers they know.


14 posted on 10/13/2008 7:08:42 PM PDT by weegee (In 2006 the Democrats took over Congress. 9% approval, $4gal gas, economy tanked. Had enuff CHANGE?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

The RIAA threw a massive party at the DNC convention in Denver. New boss will be the same as the old boss.

IF Obama DOES win, the final major act that President Bush should do is surrender the presidential claim to executive orders (it was approved in wartime and should never have lasted this long).

If nothing else, let the bastard (and yes Barack is a bastard by birth since his father was a bigamist) go without executive orders to burden us.


15 posted on 10/13/2008 7:11:34 PM PDT by weegee (In 2006 the Democrats took over Congress. 9% approval, $4gal gas, economy tanked. Had enuff CHANGE?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

I just don’t like the sound of this-—

Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator


16 posted on 10/13/2008 7:12:00 PM PDT by John W (Lord Barry heal the bitter ones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative

I will quit buy CDs and DVDs.


17 posted on 10/13/2008 7:12:06 PM PDT by razorback-bert (Save the planet...it is the only known one with beer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Military family member
An individual shows up at a bar, with ID, and askes to see your licensing for all the music you are playing. For example, at a friends bar, she playing CDs she had purchased legally on a stereo she had purchased legally, and ended up paying RIAA $20,000 to clear up the legal mess. The guy with the ID got 10% of the take.

You have to pay public performance fees. That's been around a long time, long before ipods or CDs.

I have no problem with people being paid for the use of the things they create. I didn't know that was suddenly considered a non-conservative idea.

18 posted on 10/13/2008 7:12:22 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Intelligent comments only, please; those responding from emotion will be ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: John W
I just don’t like the sound of this-— Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator

Well, the sound of it isn't important. It's what it IS which is important, and what it is is the opposite of all these socialists who think that making a work of art or entertainment--as I do--doesn't entitle you to profits from your work, but that it's "everyone's" to enjoy.

Like hell it is.

19 posted on 10/13/2008 7:14:15 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Intelligent comments only, please; those responding from emotion will be ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Santa Fe_Conservative
The Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act establishes within the executive branch the position of intellectual property enforcement coordinator, who will be appointed by the president.

So we cannot protect against foreign invasion from Mexico by 20 million "citizens" who are encouraged to vote here and in Mexico. We cannot protect against the Mexican military escorting drug smugglers into the US. We cannot protect against terrorist threats both foreign and domestic.

But we CAN establish a new criminal investigation branch to exclusively target those making illegal copies of music, movies, games, etc.

Bread and circuses. Have to work to have money for bread and circuses.

20 posted on 10/13/2008 7:14:15 PM PDT by weegee (In 2006 the Democrats took over Congress. 9% approval, $4gal gas, economy tanked. Had enuff CHANGE?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson