Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
breathtakingly evil ....
Great, your local butcher (literally, as in cuts up beef), will have more health regulations in place than the...
BABY BUTCHERS, who are “helping” women and will need no health regulations.
------------------------------------------------------------
Why the drop after 1960? (in deaths of women from illegal abortions)
The reasons were new and better antibiotics, better surgery and the establishment of intensive care units in hospitals. This was in the face of a rising population. Between 1967 and 1970 sixteen states legalized abortion. In most it was limited, only for rape, incest and severe fetal handicap (life of mother was legal in all states). There were two big exceptions — California in 1967, and New York in 1970 allowed abortion on demand. Now look at the chart carefully.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abortion Statistics - Decision to Have an Abortion (U.S.)
· 25.5% of women deciding to have an abortion want to postpone childbearing
· 21.3% of women cannot afford a baby
· 14.1% of women have a relationship issue or their partner does not want a child
· 12.2% of women are too young (their parents or others object to the pregnancy)
· 10.8% of women feel a child will disrupt their education or career
· 7.9% of women want no (more) children
· 3.3% of women have an abortion due to a risk to fetal health
2.8% of women have an abortion due to a risk to maternal health
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how many women’s lives have been saved by abortion?
Only about 3% of abortions since 1972 were reported to be “due to a risk to maternal health.” A reasonable person would recognize that not all of those cases represent a lethal risk. But let’s say they did. That means that nearly 45 million fetuses were butchered to save the lives of about 1.3 million women. Or put another way; 35 babies are killed to save each woman.
Abortion was legal in all 50 states prior to Roe v. Wade in cases of danger to the life of the woman.
Roe v Wade: FULL Text (The Decision that wiped out an entire Generation 33 years ago today)
Obama is not pro-choice.
Instead, he is proving he is worse - he is pro-abortion.
The difference? The first is passive on abortion (or it’s not a high priority and other things are more important) whereas the second is active on abortion (it’s critical enough we need to lobby to allow it or perhaps even enforce it).
Scary, but true.
Wednesday night McCain could have explained 0bamas promise to sign the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA). It’s on tape. 0bama promised at a Planned Parenthood convention that the first thing he would do as president is overturn every pro-life law in all 50 states, including the Partial Birth Abortion ban, parental notification and consent. That’s what FOCA would do.
McCain could have closed with explaining that 0bama’s FOCA promise is proof that 0bama’s “common ground on abortion” is just more lies and BS.
0bama and his pathetic looser, Traitor Kmiec would have been hard pressed to spin on that.
Barack Obama’s Pledge to Overturn Every Pro-Life Abortion Law One Year Old http://www.lifenews.com/nat4070.html
Barack Obama’s “Freedom of Choice Act” Would Mean 125K More Abortions http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2089733/posts
Barack Obama Takes a Subtle But Deadly Approach to Advocating Abortion http://www.lifenews.com/nat3762.html
As good as McCain did Wednesday night, he missed a tremendous opportunity to prove 0bama’s lies and rabid lust for abortion.
Pro-Life PING
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
You Tube - Over 1,500 Black Babies Per Day Are Killed In The USA / Pro-Life Anti-Abortion Video PSA
.