BOOK OF REMEMBRANCE
Posted on 10/20/2008 6:43:05 AM PDT by shortstop
There are two types of people in the world.
Those who think Colin Powell endorsed Barack Obama because he’s black, and those who believe that anyone who thinks that is a racist. One type is forced by modern political correctness into silence, and the other type is by the same means emboldened in its vigilant desire to denounce.
The numbers of each probably exceed a hundred million.
Personally, I believe racial solidarity was a factor, probably the deciding factor, in Colin Powell’s endorsement. The only other explanation is that, in the eighth decade of his life, Colin Powell has completely changed political philosophies and lost the ability to gauge political reality.
No disrespect intended, Colin Powell has been a prominent American and a career military man, but his stated reasons for backing Barack Obama don’t make sense.
Here are some examples.
He said yesterday on “Meet The Press” that the Republican Party could not be entrusted with the next two Supreme Court nominations. He said that the appointment of more conservatives to the court would be bad for the country.
That is a straw man argument that, if it is sincere, requires us to believe that Colin Powell knows nothing of John McCain’s political record of even which party controls the U.S. Senate. John McCain has been, over the last 25 years, less politically conservative than Colin Powell. John McCain would appoint moderates to the Supreme Court and the rest of the federal judiciary, but he would not appoint conservatives.
And at the end of the day, it doesn’t matter who John McCain appoints – the Harry Reid Senate, with an expected Democratic supermajority, is going to hold all the cards. Who gets on the Supreme Court for at least the next two years will be determined by the Democratic Senate, not by a possible Republican White House.
And Colin Powell knows that.
So that reason is disingenuous.
And others seem similarly unconvincing. Look at his statement on TV: “I come to the conclusion that because of his ability to inspire, because of the inclusive nature of his campaign, because he is reaching out all across America, because of who he is and his rhetorical abilities — and you have to take that into account — as well as his substance — he has both style and substance, he has met the standard of being a successful president, being an exceptional president.”
Let’s take that in order. First, “his ability to inspire.”
Actually, Barack Obama’s “ability to inspire” extends to less than half the people in the country. In fact, his support among the public is no higher than that generated by Al Gore or John Kerry when they ran for president. So far, Barack Obama’s support across the country – in spite of a staggering campaign budget and more ads than anyone has ever seen before – is essentially what it has been for any Democratic presidential candidate of the last generation.
Put another way, Barack Obama has yet to inspire as many people – as a percentage of the population – as Jimmy Carter did against Gerald Ford in 1976. And he has yet to surpass the percentage “inspired” by Bill Clinton, Al Gore or John Kerry.
Next absurdity: “because of the inclusive nature of his campaign.”
Inclusive of whom? Is that the dictionary “inclusive,” as in lots of different types of people, or the politically correct “inclusive,” as in non-white? Actually, neither is truly accurate. Barack Obama’s campaign – naturally – is composed of the traditional Democratic coalition. And at its senior levels it may be, compared to Al Gore and John Kerry, less racially diverse, by which I mean more senior people seem to be white.
Next line: “because he is reaching out all across America.” That’s meaningless. Not since Benjamin Harrison campaigned from his front porch has a presidential candidate from either party done anything other than “reach out all across America.”
Next line: “because of who he is.” That’s pretty subjective, but “who he is” includes being the most liberal and least experienced major-party presidential candidate anyone can think of.
Then Colin Powell praised Barack Obama’s abilities as a speaker, which many people would agree with.
Colin Powell was asked about the perception some would have that he endorsement was about race.
He responded, “If I had only had that in mind, I could have done this six, eight, 10 months ago. I really have been going back and forth between somebody I have the highest respect and regard for, John McCain, and somebody I was getting to know, Barack Obama. And it was only in the last couple of months that I settled on this."
That’s not a satisfying answer. The truth is that, if you decide you support a candidate – for whatever reason – you announce your endorsement at the time it will do them the most good. And right now, just two weeks before the election, when Barack Obama is up but not putting it away, is when a big-name endorsement will do him the most good. Timing is no reflection of reason, when it comes to endorsements. Colin Powell’s response doesn’t really make sense.
And neither does his endorsement.
Granted, anyone can vote for anyone for any reason they choose, and there’s nothing wrong with that. Voting – and endorsing – are completely private and personal rights, and nobody owes anybody an explanation for anything.
But, if you take race out of it, Colin Powell’s endorsement seems to be a departure from a lifetime’s choices and allegiances. Colin Powell has been a Republican insider since the days of Richard Nixon, for whom he worked. That contact proved very valuable to his military career as he hopscotched his seniors to take assignments and promotions.
He was Ronald Reagan’s national security advisor. George Bush the elder made him the youngest chairman of the joint chiefs, and the only one not to have attended West Point or Annapolis. George Bush the younger made him secretary of state.
At every turn of his career, Colin Powell has implemented and supported the conservative policies of his Republican patrons. He was, in fact, the man who assured the world in testimony before the United Nations that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. When Barack Obama claims that America was “lied into” the war in Iraq, the only conclusion that can be drawn is that he believes Colin Powell is a liar, as it was Colin Powell who assured the world and the American people that Iraqi weapons of mass destruction made the war necessary.
Further, the surge which Barack Obama opposed is an application of the so-called Powell Doctrine – the belief held by every man who served in Vietnam, that if you’re going to fight, you go in with the deck stacked in your favor and you flatten your enemy, no holds barred.
With all respect to Colin Powell, who is a noteworthy and inspiring American, the philosophy and associates of Barack Obama are a dramatic departure from what and who Colin Powell has associated himself for his entire adult life. If a man sincerely supported Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush, he cannot sincerely support Barack Obama. Without regard to which side of the equation you admire or support, the two sides are ultimately irreconcilable. They just stand for very different things.
If it wasn’t race that tipped Colin Powell to Barack Obama, it’s hard to figure out what else it could have been. Unless the general has had a late-life change of philosophy – or he spent a career supporting policies and politicians he didn’t really believe in – his support of Barack Obama doesn’t make sense. He is a career military man who personally served in the staffs of four conservative Republican presidents and benefited tremendously from them.
Colin Powell can support anybody he wants. That’s his right. Just as it’s our right to try to figure out why.
I talked with a retired Admiral yesterday. NEVER before have I seen him froth at the mouth and rant as he did yesterday. Speaking about Powell’s endorsement I will only quote this small part, “...that slimmy deserter, that son of a bitch...”
I get that this is not setting to well in some circles!
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=23963
The real Colin Powell
By Joseph Farah
© 2008 WorldNetDaily.com
I found it ironic that Secretary of State Colin Powell characterized Israel’s attack on the terrorist cell Hamas as “excessive,” “reprehensible,” “highly provocative” and “too aggressive.”
After all, the two men killed in the attack – Hamas leaders Jamal Mansour and Jamal Salim – have been responsible for the deaths of at least 80 Israelis and the wounding of more than 400 in suicide missions and attacks they orchestrated.
In my opinion, the United States ought to be congratulating Israel for the service to mankind, for the restraint showed and for the precision of an attack on a seven-story building that took out only the Hamas offices. Israel has every right to defend itself and its citizens from attack – just as every other nation in the world does.
And Colin Powell knows this. Yet, here’s what he said about the action: “This kind of response is too aggressive and it just serves to increase the level of tension and violence in the region.”
read rest of article, very informative.
What I cringed at the most in Powell's little speech was the item about two more conservative judges on the Supreme Court....which tells me Powell doesn't care much about what our forefathers intended....
I've been derided here and elsewhere for saying this but I've always believed that Powell was the ultimate Affirmative Action beneficiary.
With a Colinoscopy he could pull his own head out of his rear-end.
Answer that and you will have your answer as to who are racists and who are not. NO CONTEST!
LLS
Bush surrounded himself with world socialists thereby guaranteeing his demise.
Reagan chose people he knew and deeply trusted and charged them with the wherewithall to make tough decisions on their own.
Obama will surround himself with dyed-in-the-wool socialist terrorists and lackeys like Powell, having served his useful purpose, will be put out in the plantation fields to pick cotton.
What about the types that do not believe he did it because Obama is black?
Just one more feces piece from the cesspool of Liberalism.
And neither does his endorsement.
There is one, and only one, logical explanation beyond the race issue.
Colin Powell made the 2nd Iraq War necessary by convincing Bush 41 to bug out of Iraq in the 1st Iraq War before the job was done.
Now he wants to cement his legacy by ensuring there will be a 3rd Iraq War by doing the exact same thing before final victory is achieved in the 2nd Iraq War.
The U.S. may or may not be involved in the 3rd Iraq War. But it will cost the lives of tens of thousands of Iraqis and anyone else who may be involved.
But that's a small price to pay to ensure a legacy for Colin Powell, isn't it?
That would make him a stepnfetchit for Republicans, a backstabbing one at that.
Powell is the master of self-promotion and insincerity. Had it not been for him, perhaps we would have removed Sadam years earlier and not had to go back. He was not a good team player as Secretary of State and the idol worship bestowed upon him is unearned. Like Obama, Powell is not a descendant of slaves (he’s Caribbean) and to claim that race was not a major part of this is naive. He’s best at doing for Colin whatever is best for Colin.
Colin Powell endorsed Obama because he’s black.
Period. End of story.
I am very dissappointed in a man that I once considered a great leader. I don’t know his true reasons, but I agree that he has clearly abandoned his lifelong persuit of individual freedom and liberty.
That he would endorse a Marxist is very telling of either his shift to wanting to be taken care of by the government, as he ages or it is a shift based on race. Either way, it is very dissappointing.
good for treating “Irritable Powell Syndrome”
“I have lost any respect I had for Powell following his endorsement of Obama.”
I’ve not been a fan of Powell’s for a long time. This certainly put him in the “enemy of sanity” column for me.
powell’s reasoning for shafting the GOP are as convincing as scott mcclellan’s
Yes, Most of the time. But as Secretary of Defense Reagan chose Caspar Weinberger and Weinberger had the Liberal Frank Carlucci as his Deputy and Carlucci groomed Colin Powell like a protege. In 1981 it was a still youthful Colin Powell bouncing around the E-ring of the Pentagon.
Yes, he has claimed to be a Republican, but nothing he has ever said or done would even remotely suggest that he is a conservative. Just another RINO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.