Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Democrats Contemplate Abolishing 401(k) Tax Breaks
Workforce ^ | 10/22/2008

Posted on 10/22/2008 11:59:13 AM PDT by ncfool

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: pierrem15
My response: Rope. Horse. Tree.

I believe that the proper expression is:

"Rope. Tree. Politician. Some assembly required."

61 posted on 10/22/2008 12:31:32 PM PDT by Ancesthntr (An ex-citizen of the Frederation dedicated to stopping the Obamination from becoming President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Don’t forget they want to blow the caps off of FICA so that they you pay (double if self employed) to the last dollar earned.


62 posted on 10/22/2008 12:32:24 PM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ncfool

But, But, But, The messiah said he wouldn’t raise taxes on the middle-class!!!!


63 posted on 10/22/2008 12:33:21 PM PDT by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( The Constitution needs No interpreting, only APPLICATION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy
[Since] all union members have this benefit, how is it they are supporting the very people who are going to take their money away? This makes no sense at all, why on earth would a union or union member support this party?

The Democrats of course will have an exemption for union members, and elite friends such as the Socialists of America, and the Communist Party of the USA.

It appears that Obama so matches the positions of the CPUSA, that they are not even running a candidate of there own this year.

64 posted on 10/22/2008 12:36:44 PM PDT by RDasher (El Nino is climate, La Nina is weather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrB
I figured out that rule 308 is a ballot measure cast from a location of enhanced altitude.

Sometimes that's true. Sometimes it is cast from very unexpected places, but the message is delivered very swiftly (faster, even, than FedEx).

65 posted on 10/22/2008 12:37:20 PM PDT by Ancesthntr (An ex-citizen of the Frederation dedicated to stopping the Obamination from becoming President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: yazoo

Only the Democrats could dream up the idea of letting you keep your own money is a subsidy by the government. All your money belong to us!!!

BINGO! That says it all.


66 posted on 10/22/2008 12:41:15 PM PDT by wzlboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY
But, But, But, The messiah said he wouldn’t raise taxes on the middle-class!!!!

Tsk, tsk, tsk, you must have been playing hooky on the day that taxes were discussed in school. This is NOT a tax, ROLF, it is a "contribution" - and if you ever refer to it as anything else, First Comrade Obama will make sure that you (and anyone else who clearly doesn't understand what's going on) receive that education that you missed as a child.

67 posted on 10/22/2008 12:41:19 PM PDT by Ancesthntr (An ex-citizen of the Frederation dedicated to stopping the Obamination from becoming President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ncfool

Well America, here’s your future. A nice reverse mortgage so the government will end up owning your house, and you get a social security check. If you’re lucky.


68 posted on 10/22/2008 12:44:06 PM PDT by GVnana ("I once dressed as Tina Fey for Halloween." - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

I couldn’t let the horses I love bear the weight of such a duty. An old stool would be just fine.


69 posted on 10/22/2008 12:45:02 PM PDT by King_Corey (www.kingcorey.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ncfool
Under Ghilarducci’s plan, all workers would receive a $600 annual inflation-adjusted subsidy from the U.S. government but would be required to invest 5 percent of their pay into a guaranteed retirement account administered by the Social Security Administration. The money in turn would be invested in special government bonds that would pay 3 percent a year, adjusted for inflation.

So basically they're increasing the Social Security tax?

70 posted on 10/22/2008 12:45:08 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncfool

I’ve been wondering for weeks why the media is pretty much ignoring this....


71 posted on 10/22/2008 12:45:11 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncfool

Who didn’t see this coming??? Congress is looking to pay for that multi-trillion dollar bailout.

I wonder if Obama, a sitting US senator, will support this idea.


72 posted on 10/22/2008 12:45:47 PM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
Tsk, tsk, tsk, you must have been playing hooky on the day that taxes were discussed in school. This is NOT a tax, ROLF, it is a "contribution" - and if you ever refer to it as anything else, First Comrade Obama will make sure that you (and anyone else who clearly doesn't understand what's going on) receive that education that you missed as a child.

Actually, there was a time during that 90s that Daniel Patrick Moynihan and others led the charge in pointing out the C in FICA means contribution and people shouldn't think of it as a tax. I don't have any references to that other than memory, but I see I'm not the only one who recalls it.

73 posted on 10/22/2008 12:45:47 PM PDT by Dahoser (America's great untapped alternative energy source: The Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

......So basically they’re increasing the Social Security tax?....

In a basement closet using smoke and prisms directed toward a hall of mirrors


74 posted on 10/22/2008 12:46:55 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Ferengi?.....Probably not, but he sure has the lobes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

“It’s called SOCIAL SECURITY and a little over 12% of our earnings are taken to go towards that (6% ours, 6% employers’ budget for us).

Isn’t it, 15%? 7.5% from you and 7.5% from you with your employers’s name on the check? (All 15% comes from YOU!)


75 posted on 10/22/2008 12:47:29 PM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
What I think part of this is about, and no one is saying, is this mandatory 5% additional into SS is their round-about way of shoring up SS and putting more money into the fund for them to play with.... when WE invest that money it grows and WE benefit from that growth at retirement, when the government takes it and puts it into SS they spend it.. this is just a method of kicking the can down the road and taking more non-deductible money from the taxpayers without coming out and saying they are increasing mandatory SS deductions...

They are also not telling people they are going to change the cap and there is one article that said they plan to up SS to as much as 32%... when people are self-employed this will be a killer, not to mention what this will do to small business owners when they hire.

76 posted on 10/22/2008 12:49:40 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

It’s 7.65 percent instead of 7.50 percent, broken down into 6.20 percent for Social Security and 1.45 percent for Medicare.


77 posted on 10/22/2008 12:49:46 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: okie01

If all money must go to special Gov. bonds, what will that do to the mutual funds markets?
Do you think a 700 pt drop is big? Just wait!


78 posted on 10/22/2008 12:53:25 PM PDT by Holicheese (Get up Tom Brady, get up! PLEASE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ncfool
"guaranteed"

cough....choke....gag....retch...

79 posted on 10/22/2008 12:55:31 PM PDT by informavoracious (Oust all incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

I’m assuming you’re opposed to taxing 401Ks.

People putting money in a 401K can’t be compared to “shopping til you drop.”

I can see the Socialists raising the retirement age “for the good of the people.”


80 posted on 10/22/2008 12:58:06 PM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Mainstream Media, the Left is Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson