Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Bingaman(D-NM) Wants 'Fairness Doctrine' Back
EYEBLAST ^ | 10/22/08 | EYEBLAST

Posted on 10/22/2008 1:32:43 PM PDT by paltz

Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) told yesterday KKOB's Jim Villanucci yesterday he would want to reimpose the so-called fairness doctrine

AUDIO


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: bingaman; fairnessdoctrine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 10/22/2008 1:32:43 PM PDT by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: holdonnow

FYI


2 posted on 10/22/2008 1:35:54 PM PDT by CedarDave (John McCain -- "Country First" is getting yourself elected. Save us from Obama and the socialists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Personally, I’m shocked!


3 posted on 10/22/2008 1:36:34 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Election '08, the year McCain defined the word "dilemma")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Is this so talk radio may go back to discussing carrot cake recipes?

Because for sure, the “Fairness Doctrine” will in no way expand the intellectual discussion of issues of importance.


4 posted on 10/22/2008 1:36:55 PM PDT by alloysteel (For me, the election is over. I voted early for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz
Does that mean Conservatives could replace 50% of TV and Print "journalist"?

Put Stephie on the radio and Rush on ABC News?

5 posted on 10/22/2008 1:37:32 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

Senator Bingaman can stick his ‘fairness’ doctrine where the sun don’t shine.


6 posted on 10/22/2008 1:38:42 PM PDT by RaiderRose (Don't be a racist. Vote for 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Bingamen is talking about more than just talk radio, he wants it to apply to “all media” in his answer to one question.
7 posted on 10/22/2008 1:40:11 PM PDT by JimSEA (just another liberal-bashing fearmonger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: paltz

With today’s technology, the popular talk shows would just move to satellite, which is not subject to FCC regulation.

Radio stations would lose listeners, and would be the ones that suffer.

In St Louis, KMOX has already taken a big hit the last few years when they lost the Cardinal broadcasts. If they lose Rush, they will not even crack the top 10 with any demographic.

CBS owns that station, and it would almost be fitting if it is destroyed by jealous left wingers.


8 posted on 10/22/2008 1:40:18 PM PDT by TravisBickle (Are you talkin' to me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

On NPR yesterday was a segment featuring youth essays on “How to start a Revolution”.


9 posted on 10/22/2008 1:40:55 PM PDT by Brian S. Fitzgerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

actually day before yesterday - I’m trying to find a transcript


10 posted on 10/22/2008 1:41:43 PM PDT by Brian S. Fitzgerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

‘Fairness Doctrine’ should be called the ‘OldMedia Protection and No Free Speech Act of 2009’


11 posted on 10/22/2008 1:44:36 PM PDT by MaineConservative (Obama, we aren't electing McCain for president of GEEKS-On-Call, but for President of the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
Does that mean Conservatives could replace 50% of TV and Print "journalist"?

Don't forget professors at universities.

12 posted on 10/22/2008 1:46:19 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

I guess they’re willing to give up MSNBC/ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN?


13 posted on 10/22/2008 1:50:08 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment (Is this field required?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: paltz
I know he isn't, but he should be talking about the msm networks’ and the press’ lack of fairness in their reporting. As it is, talk radio is the balance.
14 posted on 10/22/2008 1:55:32 PM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

I think I might see a pony near this pile of manure.

If Bingaman is saying this publicly, it looks like he doesn’t care about any backlash or galvanizing conservatives. In other words, he is getting cocky and overplaying his hand. This is always how leftists lose. Let’s hope more liberals start being this honest about their intentions.


15 posted on 10/22/2008 2:02:00 PM PDT by murdoog (http://babydoc3.livejournal.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

The First Amendment does not contain a “fairness doctrine”. It only guarantees your right to political speech, not guaranteed equal speech.


16 posted on 10/22/2008 2:11:41 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Never doubt Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz
Sirius stock is selling for about .30, as in 30 cents. Might be time to invest - if this goes through, and I have no doubt with the chosen one and Nancy in charge that it will- Rush, Sean, and Mark may have to go to satelitte. At that time, I will buy a receiver since the mainstream media, as bad as they are now, will be worse- AP will stand for American Pravda.
17 posted on 10/22/2008 2:12:06 PM PDT by pineybill (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

I assume he wants the New York Times included - an equal number of column inches of positive material for each party... /s


18 posted on 10/22/2008 2:13:14 PM PDT by GOPJ (If Obama wet his pants the MSM would spin it as inspired and wonderful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz


Ya, herr radio person! First ve vill bring back ze Fairness Doctrine and zen ve vill pass ze Hate Crimes Laws making all of our OPPOSITION KNEEL AT OUR FEET UNT I...URK!....ZEIG, HEIL!!

19 posted on 10/22/2008 2:18:42 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz

If democrats bring back the ‘Fairness Doctrine’, will it apply to the msm, as well? Will their coverages be monitored for balance? And are conservatives ready to file suit in every case where the msm violates that ‘Fairness Doctrine?” If that ‘Fairness Doctrine’ is approved, every broadcast license of the msm should be challenged in court!


20 posted on 10/22/2008 2:39:44 PM PDT by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson