Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: danamco; lafroste; Constitutionalist Conservative; RC2; antiRepublicrat
I don't know who would have standing. Saying that any voting citizen would have standing, because this deals with an election, may hold water. However, nobody is really directly harmed by Obama's running for President.

There are three requirements for standing: Injury, causation, and redressability.

Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury - an invasion of a legally protected interest which is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.

Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.

Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.

See: Wikipedia's Discussion on Standing

74 posted on 10/23/2008 8:04:22 AM PDT by CT-Freeper (Said the frequently disappointed but ever optimistic Mets fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: CT-Freeper

The voter or campaign contributer in an election is by definition subject to “injury”, like participation in any contest. But if the rules of the contest are violated, an injury to the process has occured.


79 posted on 10/23/2008 8:08:30 AM PDT by Brian S. Fitzgerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: CT-Freeper
However, nobody is really directly harmed by Obama's running for President.

In politics -- you only hurt the ones you love.

From Wikipedia entry on Matricide:

Known or Suspected Matricides

85 posted on 10/23/2008 8:11:26 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: CT-Freeper
However, nobody is really directly harmed by Obama's running for President.

True, nobody is really directly harmed by Obama's running for President.
However, if elected, 300,000,000 Americans would be directly harmed by his violating the Constitution and taking office. The harm will be in undermining the veracity of the Constitution, which outlines and protects our Civil Liberties and constitutes the Government which we have elected.
88 posted on 10/23/2008 8:13:30 AM PDT by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: CT-Freeper

Sounds like any citizen has all three:

Injury: A free and fair election is a right, and anything that interferes with it, such as a sham candidate, causes injury to every American with suffrage.

Causation: Obama’s running

Redressability: A court order to remove him from ballots and/or prevent his swearing-in as President.


127 posted on 10/23/2008 9:15:40 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson