Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Billy Graham Won't Advise Obama Because of Strong Pro-Abortion Position
Life News.com ^ | 11/7/08 | Steve Ertelt

Posted on 11/07/2008 12:19:28 PM PST by lewisglad

Billy Graham Won't Advise Obama Because of His Strong Pro-Abortion Position

by Steven Ertelt LifeNews.com Editor November 7, 2008

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Respected Christian preacher Billy Graham has been an advisor and spiritual helper to presidents dating back to President Eisenhower.

But that relationship with presidents will now come to an end because incoming president Barack Obama takes such a profoundly pro-abortion position.

To be sure, Graham's health is playing a part in the decision his son Franklin Graham told the Associated Press.

"My father feels like his time and day for that is over," Franklin Graham said. "But he would certainly like to meet (Obama) and pray with him."

But Franklin expressed concerns about Obama's abortion position -- something he mentioned to the senator during the campaign as a stumbling block -- and indicated that as the main reason.

He told AP the Bible is clear in its teaching that human life deserves respect and protection even before birth.

"President-elect Obama has heard our position," Franklin Graham told the news service. "And I told him that this was very difficult for us and hard for us. It's a moral issue that we just can't back down on."

"But he's our president-elect, and those positions that he holds that are contrary to Biblical teaching, I hope that God will change his heart," Graham added.

Obama's position in favor of unlimited abortions throughout pregnancy for any reason was a key issue for pro-life voters during the campaign.

Obama also came under fire for supporting the so-called Freedom of Choice Act, a Congressional bill that would make unlimited abortions under Roe v. Wade the national law and overturn the abortion reduction laws of all 50 states.

The senator also drew condemnation for his votes in the Illinois state legislature against a bill that would have made sure newborns who survive failed abortions receive appropriate medical care.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: abortion; bho2008; bible; billygraham; christians; digg; foca; obama; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; pastors; proaborts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last
To: Rightly Biased
What an amazing life.


41 posted on 11/07/2008 12:54:30 PM PST by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
“I wouldn’t want my daughters saddled with a BABY”

Punished...a much stronger word than saddled...and the one he specifically used.

God help us, what did this country just do...I've been swinging between abject sadness and Bruce Banner rage since Tuesday night...everytime I see him, or hear his voice, or view his stupid "Office of the President Elect" sign (what was that?)...ugh...and I'm supposed to pray for this evil?

42 posted on 11/07/2008 12:55:35 PM PST by Christian4Bush (Only in a Democrat run Congress can a 9% approval rating get you an increased leadership role.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: thesetruths

I am thankful for their stand. Too many consrv/repub are now praising BO


43 posted on 11/07/2008 1:00:05 PM PST by Glacier Honey (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Every time I see one of these articles, I am reminded of many, many posts between me and pro-lifers who said they would “never” vote for McCain.

It made no difference to them at all that he would be running against an extremely pro-abortion candidate (whoever won the Rat nomination). In their view, it wasn’t their “responsibility” if they refused to vote against the Rat nominee and he won; they were absolved, they said, because it was the “GOP’s fault” that they were not given a candidate they liked.

I hope they changed their mind by election day.

But I bring this up because this line of thinking must be repulsed and the true consequences of it brought home again and again.

More and more children will die because Obama won this election. In my judgment, refusing to act to try to DEFEAT Obama and ALL the likeminded people would will be in his administration and nominated to the courts, by voting for McCain, is a morally culpable act. And very sad.

I’m only asking that people think through this point as we continue to work for the cause of life in a very, very abortion- and infanticide-committed administration. We need to continue to educate in love, even on our own side sometimes.


44 posted on 11/07/2008 1:00:26 PM PST by fightinJAG (Who needs the Fairness Doctrine? Obama admits the power to tax is the power to destroy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Obama been Lyin’ already has a spiritual environment:

The Reverend Jeremiah “US OF KKK A” Wright.


45 posted on 11/07/2008 1:00:51 PM PST by dotnetfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
Excerpt:

Though never partisan in his preaching, Billy Graham is a registered Democrat. His son expressed concern about Obama's views on abortion and gay marriage — an issue Franklin Graham raised in a meeting with the Illinois senator — saying that he and is father are conservatives who believe the Bible speaks clearly on those issues.

"President-elect Obama heard our position," Franklin Graham said. "And I told him that this was very difficult for us and hard for us. It's a moral issue that we just can't back down on."

"But he's our president-elect, and those positions that he holds that are contrary to Biblical teaching, I hope that God will change his heart," said Graham, who now heads the Charlotte-based Billy Graham Evangelistic Association.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hDqdbR7yEX1ua_ck_SuSCaHRFsIAD94A8L880


46 posted on 11/07/2008 1:01:52 PM PST by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Wow - he looks like a kid in those first photos (with Truman and Ike). Hard to think of him as stepping away from the advisor role; he has been such a fixture for nearly 60 years.


47 posted on 11/07/2008 1:02:41 PM PST by AzSteven ("War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." Jean Dutourd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

In other words, Obama is a spiritual lost cause.


48 posted on 11/07/2008 1:04:51 PM PST by littlehouse36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

My, he was handsome.

Did y’all know the horrible thing BO said about poor, dear Nancy Reagan today? And it wasn’t even true!


49 posted on 11/07/2008 1:05:01 PM PST by thesetruths
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Of all the sickening stuff from this scary freak - his atance on infanticide is the most evil and one that reflects on all of us.

God Bless the Grahams.


50 posted on 11/07/2008 1:05:18 PM PST by eleni121 (EN TOUTO NIKA!! +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
Weren’t the Clintons pro-partial birth abortion? I think this is more Franklin talking than Billy.

Yes they were.

However, people can change and see the light. Maybe it's Franklin or maybe it's Divine grace but Billy could have had an awakening. Who knows how God works in the heart of a man?

51 posted on 11/07/2008 1:05:43 PM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

What a Great Man how many men have had that much access to so many presidents?


52 posted on 11/07/2008 1:08:15 PM PST by Rightly Biased (McCain is the reason Sarah Lost <><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya
yes--the Clintons are pro-partial birth abortion... and Billy Graham thinks very highly of Bill Clinton... i never understood that...

He also absolved Clinton of the adulterous behavior, "It isn't his fault, women throw themselves at him," and other rot. I didn't understand it then myself. So then what is the difference here, why was he okay with Clinton's pro-death stance?

53 posted on 11/07/2008 1:08:48 PM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Always Right; lewisglad
killing live babies crosses everyone’s line.

Apparently not, he won with the help of a lot of people who claim they are Christians.

54 posted on 11/07/2008 1:10:52 PM PST by wmfights (Elections have Consequences!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Mr. Graham should have thought of this dilemma long ago when he decided to become a Democrat. But, wait, he’ll now likely part ways with Obama on adding homosexuality to the school curriculum, and on redistribution of wealth, and on radical terrorists being on Obama’s staff.

Now why exactly did this guy join the Democrats?


55 posted on 11/07/2008 1:14:39 PM PST by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased
For a preacher with no church, and who spent his life preaching to football stadiums full of people he never saw again, the First Families gave Graham the rare chance to be a White House family pastor.

He gave them a sanctuary; they gave him a congregation. He carried the families through times of loss--literal and political; several wanted him to be with them during their last nights in the White House.

Richard Nixon collapsed in Graham's arms at his mother's funeral in 1967. Bill Clinton took him to sit at the bedside of a dying friend in 1989. Graham was the first person outside the family whom Nancy Reagan called when her husband died in 2004.

Last month, Johnson's daughters Lynda and Luci reached out to him as their mother was dying. Two days before she passed away, he called and talked to them, and since Lady Bird was awake and alert, they put the phone to her ear.

The former First Lady and the former White House pastor chatted some and then shared a prayer together.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1651625-1,00.html

56 posted on 11/07/2008 1:16:20 PM PST by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MozarkDawg

Yes he did-and I will freely admit I lost a LOT of respect for him when he embraced Anklepants like he did...

...and now that I see he has always been and is STILL a registered member of the party of death, I have none at all.


57 posted on 11/07/2008 1:17:45 PM PST by snuffy smiff (the most pathetic thing about libs is not that they lie-but that they lie unto themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Thank you for the pictures. I accepted Jesus Christ as my Savior after listening to Billy Graham in a televised broadcast. That was in 1973. The picture of Billy with Ronald Reagan made me cry...I’ve missed Ronald Reagan so much this week—the sincere regard that he had for Billy Graham is obvious in this photo. The look on his face is how I like to remember him. It reminded me that Ronald Reagan was EVERYTHING good and kind and honest and strong that the current President elect is not...God forgive this nation for they know not what they have done. I’m just so sad for this Country...


58 posted on 11/07/2008 1:17:59 PM PST by TerrisFriend ("I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me!" God Bless the U.S.A.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush

You’re right. I couldn’t remember the exact phrase.

Don’t know how we’ll put up with this clown for 4 years. Wouldn’t be surprised if his own party turns on him.


59 posted on 11/07/2008 1:21:37 PM PST by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DrewsDad

Rev Wright...


60 posted on 11/07/2008 1:21:52 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson