[SeekAndFind]

For those conservatives who did not vote this election and helped Obama win, here is the message those who DID support Obama got : ( from Krugman's editorial ) :

"But it would be fair for the new administration to point out how conservative ideology, the belief that greed is always good, helped create this crisis. What F.D.R. said in his second inaugural address — “We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics” — has never rung truer.

[beethovenfan]

Krugman is an anal aperture. 0bama has NO mandate to redistribute anything!

[buffyt]

You know if he had won 95% or more of the vote.... But he won 63% I think and McCain won 47% I think or close to that. Hardly a mandate. Looks to me like Republicans are AGAINST redistibution and Democrats are for it - they enjoy sucking at the government tit. Republicans are too busy working and creating the wealth that Democrats plan to steal.

ATLAS SHRUGS

[Seaplaner]

John McCain denounced his opponent as a socialist...

Really?

John McCain was a little too focused on loosing without committing so much as a foot fault to criticize Marxist Obama of anything substantive.

Marxist Krugman is projecting Joe-the-plumber's bravery onto Mister Congeniality.

.

[ken21]

krugman’s money should be used first.

[avenir]

"If the election of our first African-American president didn’t stir you, if it didn’t leave you teary-eyed and proud of your country, there’s something wrong with you."

Guilty. I'm a believer in Christ Jesus, that's what's wrong with me. If loving Him (and thus refusing to fall for the imposter's cotton candy) is wrong I don't wanna be right...

[dalebert]

Sorry the government already took everything. Aint nuthin to distribute. lol

[2harddrive]

The Ayatollah Hussein IS NOT the President elect yet, and may never be. We will see what the Electors decide mid-December about supporting an illegal alien as President of the US. McCain may yet win.

[mnrep]

If the election of our first African-American president didn’t stir you, if it didn’t leave you teary-eyed and proud of your country, there’s something wrong with you.

Uhh, then I guess there’s something wrong with me..but what?

[an amused spectator]

This year, however, Mr. Obama ran on a platform of guaranteed health care and tax breaks for the middle class, paid for with higher taxes on the affluent. John McCain denounced his opponent as a socialist and a “redistributor,” but America voted for him anyway. That’s a real mandate.

No, it WASN'T the October Surprise at all. Whoops! There goes your 401K, and it's the Republicans' fault!

Krugman: Once a Liar, Always A Liar.

[RWB Patriot]

I wonder what he’ll be preaching if Obama does somehow manage to keep his word and screws things up even more. It’ll be quite interesting to see how far the RATs will go to defend their candidate, even as he’s digging us into a deeper hole.

[NJRighty]

If the election of our first African-American president didn’t stir you, if it didn’t leave you teary-eyed and proud of your country, there’s something wrong with you.

If McCain and Palin had won, do you think would he have written "If the election of our first female Vice President didn’t stir you, if it didn’t leave you teary-eyed and proud of your country, there’s something wrong with you" ?

Nope

[volslover]

So if there is something wrong with me then Krugman, I guess I qualify for a lifetime of being taken care of by the new incoming Nanny government since as you said Krugman, something is wrong with me?

I didn’t shed a tear. I never did judge him by his color or use his race against him like I guess you did Krugman. Why should I shed a tear? I didn’t drink the Kool Aide and I don’t go to this church. The only thing I am deeply concerned over are his proposed policies and the Chicago style voter fraud, the foreign contributions. If he is really eligible to run after sitting on his birth certificate will always a wonder to me since the man didn’t answer it.

If that makes something wrong with me Krguman, then sign me up for lifetime disability since I will never be moved by a Chicago thug and won’t get over what he did to Clinton or Palin to name a few instances (There are more) or how he didn’t responds to serious questions

Crying I won’t do, but screaming I will. I learned it from ancestors who didn’t like the way they were treated by the mean old British and came here for freedom. My ancestors earned my tears. Not this arrogant man who has a serious insecurity problem and has to have a seal or a sign everywhere he goes and is appointing nothing but carpetbaggers to his administration. Dissent is the American thing to do. Speaking our minds is patrotic. Dissent is patriotic. Crying is not. The country is founded on the rights of those who were not in the King’s favor.

If you want to shed tears over the fact you held the man’s race against him, that’s your business.

[Tzimisce]

...so how much is Krugman going to fork over for all of this?

I mean, we need to avoid greed when it comes to redistributing right?

[Cacique]

btt

[Yardstick]

Bear in mind, also, that this year’s presidential election was a clear referendum on political philosophies — and the progressive philosophy won.

Possibly true if the press had done its job and presented Obama as the full-blown progressive that he is. Furthermore, the redistribution issue wasn't on the radar until Obama happened to bump into Joe the Plumber, and that was fairly late in the campaign. Do "clear referendums" on major points of political philosophy come about this way? And how about the fact that our candidate only weakly upheld his side of the argument? The issue was weakly raised and weakly engaged, and only as a matter of chance fairly late in the game, yet this is a clear referendum?

[joma89]

I saw a good cartoon recently. First picture showed a caricature of George Bush with the number 51% and the words “Nation divided”. The next one had a caricature of hussein with the number 52% and the words “Nation United”.

That pretty much sums up the communists mentality of “By any means necessary.”

JoMa