Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

Still trying to figure out why we need a ‘civilian defense force’ that is ‘as well funded as the military.’

I’d say it is just a ploy to create yet more bureaucracy and yet more government jobs which of course can be unionized, but everything this joker does and says seems to be geared towards something more nefarious.

If he does see the next phase of the civil rights movement to revolve around ‘economic justice’ and the Constitution as an impediment, well, one does wonder what’s in store for us.

I think highly illiberal times are ahead (using the old definition of liberal). An egomaniac president setting up a standing domestic army, aiming to destroy the Constitution, restrict gun ownership and ‘spread the wealth’ is not a pleasant prospect.


24 posted on 11/10/2008 2:03:44 PM PST by Harry Wurzbach (Joe The Plumber & Rep. Thaddeus McCotter are my heroes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Harry Wurzbach
‘as well funded as the military.’

That one has me too.I was wondering if they would have jets, tanks, submarines etc....

63 posted on 11/10/2008 2:19:16 PM PST by Born In America (0bama, The Kenyan Clown; The star of the Socialism Circus on steroids....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Harry Wurzbach

I’m trying to figure why we need one too

course like I have said before I don’t expect the media to do their job and ask their messiah this question or any question


90 posted on 11/10/2008 2:26:10 PM PST by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick MA,CT sham marriage end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Harry Wurzbach

I think your evaluation of the national police force is way wrong.

The topic of the thread is far more accurate.

This FORCE will be used to shut people up and take care of those who faiil re-education. Like me.


133 posted on 11/10/2008 2:42:21 PM PST by stockpirate (Compasionate Conservative, nothing compassionate or conservative about them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Harry Wurzbach

I think your evaluation of the national police force is way wrong.

The topic of the thread is far more accurate.

This FORCE will be used to shut people up and take care of those who faiil re-education. Like me.


134 posted on 11/10/2008 2:43:07 PM PST by stockpirate (Compasionate Conservative, nothing compassionate or conservative about them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Harry Wurzbach
Still trying to figure out why we need a ‘civilian defense force’ that is ‘as well funded as the military.’

We already have one. It's called the National Guard.

We already have health care for the poor, too. Medicaid and Medicare.

The lefts agenda isn't about helping the civilians. It's about total, absolute power over the civilians.

158 posted on 11/10/2008 2:50:50 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Harry Wurzbach
Still trying to figure out why we need a ‘civilian defense force’ that is ‘as well funded as the military.’

To create jobs for all of those po folks he promised.

And of course to create more government CONTROL!

160 posted on 11/10/2008 2:50:58 PM PST by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Harry Wurzbach

I think, that is IMO the Civilian Defense Force” as he calls it is a force he is guaranteed to be able to control. The U.S. Military is comprised of true, and great Americans with a mission. The Military consists mainly of Officers and men/women dedicated to, and sworn to defend the Constitution of the United States.

Obama wants the “Civilian Defense Force” to manipulate at his will me thinks. He would have trouble sleeping at night knowing he couldn’t trust Constitutionally dedicated Military to thwart their oath to our Nation for his contrary will.

The Military is not for Domestic purposes. His Civies will be for Domestic purpose only. I betcha.


181 posted on 11/10/2008 2:59:13 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, Call 'em what you will, they ALL have Fairies livin' in their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Harry Wurzbach

Still trying to figure out why we need a ‘civilian defense force’ that is ‘as well funded as the military.’

Because one has to pay the street thugs that will be keeping the citizens in line.


468 posted on 11/10/2008 6:36:08 PM PST by Chickensoup (we owe HUSSEIN & Democrats the exact kind respect & loyalty that they showed us, Bush & Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Harry Wurzbach
Still trying to figure out why we need a ‘civilian defense force’ that is ‘as well funded as the military.’

To stop the killing and drug gangs in the hood.

584 posted on 11/11/2008 5:04:02 AM PST by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Harry Wurzbach

“Mau Mau” is what this tentative organization should be termed in reality.
Respectfully,
NSNR-19


608 posted on 11/11/2008 6:32:54 AM PST by No Surrender No Retreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Harry Wurzbach
Still trying to figure out why we need a ‘civilian defense force’ that is ‘as well funded as the military.’

He must think our armed forced won't do the dirty deeds for him, but of course, the sheeple will. They proved that on Nov. 4.
623 posted on 11/11/2008 8:29:29 AM PST by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Harry Wurzbach
An egomaniac president setting up a standing domestic army, aiming to destroy the Constitution, restrict gun ownership and ‘spread the wealth’ is not a pleasant prospect.

Nope, that is just a warmup to the unpleasantry. The real 'troubles' will just be getting started at that point.

708 posted on 11/13/2008 9:33:22 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Harry Wurzbach
I think highly illiberal times are ahead (using the old definition of liberal). An egomaniac president setting up a standing domestic army, aiming to destroy the Constitution, restrict gun ownership and ‘spread the wealth’ is not a pleasant prospect.

To put it EXTREMELY MILDLY.

Thanks.

716 posted on 11/14/2008 8:14:26 AM PST by Quix (LAWLESS LEADER QUOTES FM 1900: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson