Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gargantua
"I believe the U. S. Constitution prohibits the presence of an active "Standing army..." within the borders of the United States of America; one of the problems Lincoln wrestled with in the mid-to-late 1860's, which I believe he negotiated successfully by declaring Martial Law and a national State of Emergency."

Actually, you are correct. There is no provision within the Constitution for an army - for a Navy, yes.

However, within our nation's last hundred years or so, it became apparent we needed such. So, we need a Constitutional Amendment to change that.

In this day of hi-tech weaponry and smaller world, the US cannot rely on a civilian Militia to counter our enemies, as much as some dream we should.

18 posted on 11/11/2008 3:56:08 AM PST by A Navy Vet (In perpetuum sacramentum : An Oath is Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: A Navy Vet

Talk of a standing army in the US comporting with the Constitution for possible defense from forces without the confines is not the problem. The purpose of Obama’s CDF is not for combating threats from without - it is for oppressing dissent from within.


39 posted on 11/11/2008 2:23:58 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson