why can’t we see any candidates birth certificate?....why can’t
we?..its just unbelievable....
Only Republicans are bound by law.
Yes, you’d think a candidate would need to show believable proof of birthplace, etc., long before any election takes place!
This current scenario is totally ridiculous. Dare I say that more would’ve been made of this over time had Zero been, ahem, all white?
I can get my original birth certificate with a signed, notarized letter. It might take a few days, but they’ll send it to me.
He’s the President-elect of the United States, for crying out loud! He should be able to get his in about two minutes. He’s got the entire government at his disposal. What’s the problem here??
‘” why can’t we see any candidate’s birth certificate?”
-——don’t you get it? You JUST CAN’T!!
A birth certificate is a paltry temporal human document.
Would you ask to see the birth certificates of Jesus or
Mohammed? NO! The proof of their birth exists in sacred texts called the BIBLE and the KORAN.
Likewise all we need to know about Obama exists in
DREAMS FROM MY FATHER.
Now, SUBMIT, or ELSE. And STOP asking mundane questions
I couldn't even get a drivers license without showing mine.
This should be part of a full medical record which is necessary for voters to make an intelligent decision - at least in the case of John McCain.
> why can’t we see any candidates birth certificate? <
Because it would show that his father really was Frank Marshall Davis.
The election was a sham paid for by foreigners. They won’t release it cuz if Obama isn’t qualified, welcome to Kenya.
couldn’t there have been a less lib state/circuit court to do this in?
This new Freeper has two questions (I may be naive, so pls don’t flame me). One, does anyone know when the California Superior Court will address the Keyes writ? How is that timed/worked? In other words, when could we expect a decision from the Court?
Secondly. I’ve waded through an awful lot of posts on multiple threads trying to become as familiar with the facts as I can. I am very impressed by the work that has been done so far. Am convinced that we have something very fishy going on here, BUT.... why would no-one speak from Columbia, Harvard, the Health Dept in Hawaii, Occidental, you name it? I understand that current employees there would/could be fired on the spot for speaking up, but there have got to be folks that no longer work there who could provide details. I looked at the Harvard Law Review photo in that 6000+ post thread and was able to identify at least one person via googling his name. Found this gentleman on the web as being a lawyer with an existing email address. We could do this exercise for everyone on that photo. But the question remains, why is no-one speaking up? Am I the only one who thinks this is so odd? How can one keep that many people silent?
2454