“What if they won’t take it up, because the Constitution is clear and there is no “constitutional question?” And if he can’t prove he’s natural born, maybe they don’t want to put their power to the test. If they say he may not be POTUS, how are they going to enforce their ruling? And if they can’t, do they want THAT precedent?”
The Constitution is clear that the president must be a natural born American. All they need do is ask to see his full birth certificate. Surely that’s not asking too much? If it says he was born in Kenya then its clear as crystal that he’s NOT natural born.
The fact that this matter is going to “conference” dooms it.
All of this is the fault of the barry-backside kissing MSM.
If they had done their jobs (instead of trying to find dirt on Palin) we never would have been in this mess.
Well, obviously for 0bama it’s a lot better to say there IS no original bc to be found (the dog ate it), than to hand in one that says he’s Kenyan-born.
I’m saying SCOTUS does not want to be in the position to say he can’t be POTUS. And there are plenty of ways for them to wiggle out.
They do not want to issue a ruling that effectively throws out a decisive popular vote, and brings wrath, challenges, and questions of relevance, scope of powers, and legitimacy on them.
And while that sounds crazy to us, it wouldn’t be to millions of moonbats.
If it says he was born in Kenya then its clear as crystal that he’s NOT natural born
Of course, if it says he was born in Kenya, 0 will know that before he turns it over, so he will NOT turn it over. The question is will he turn over a forgery or ignore them instead?
Showing another forgery allows the supremes to save face and not force a showdown, if it's at all convincing to a lay persons eye. This is the route I'd bet on, if of course his real BC says Kenya.