I was going to say this would be a dangerous precedent to set. After this it will become the norm for a president from the opposing party to investigate the last one.
That energy is better spent trying to confront current problems than going back into the past.
That energy is better spent trying to confront current problems than going back into the past.
My thoughts exactly.
agreed
>I was going to say this would be a dangerous precedent to set. After this it will become the norm for a president from the opposing party to investigate the last one.<
This is the type of precedent that makes loud noises such as bang.
The worthless WJC started his own precedent: an ex POTUS criticizing a current POTUS, and on foreign soil. That had NEVER been done in US history till he broke the unwritten law-followed soon after by his pathetic little senile mini-me ,Jimmy Carter. Now this loathsome toad wants to start a precedent , and one redolent of the Third World. This BETTER just be a trial balloon to placate the moonbats, to be quietly dropped...