Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When Environmentalism Is a Luxury
Pajamas Media ^ | November 24 | Melissa Clouthier

Posted on 11/24/2008 9:23:17 AM PST by AJKauf

Environmentalism is a luxury of the rich, pure and simple, and these same people preaching often live lifestyles that offset their environmentally conscience choices. For all his moralizing, Al Gore has yet to give up private jets or his huge home. And even George W. Bush’s ranch, eco-friendly as it is, is expensive. The average American could not afford to build a home like that if he wanted to.

Barack Obama and many other environmentalists claim to be for the little guy and yet promote policies that will directly harm the little guy.

Save the planet or save money? When the economy's in trouble, the answer is obvious....

(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: enviromentalism; obama; obamatransitionfile

1 posted on 11/24/2008 9:23:18 AM PST by AJKauf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

Environmentalists, vegans, fur protesters, animal rights activists, etc,

are just a symptom of the huge abundance of this country which allows people to worry about things besides

food & shelter.


2 posted on 11/24/2008 9:24:56 AM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf
What is so expensive about President Bush's ranch?
The house predates his presidency and is actually pretty unpretentious but undoubtedly had to be security upgraded.
Who wanted vacation land in Crawford Texas 10 years ago anyway?

Now, did they mention Algors 100 foot boat/house-lake yacht?

3 posted on 11/24/2008 9:26:34 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; Normandy; Delacon; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; ...
From the link:
The environmental movement depends not only on excessive moralizing and the same sort of mother guilt that keeps therapists everywhere in steady employment, but also suspect data. Just this week, data from NASA which came from Russia turned out to be false. John Hindraker says, “As the scientific evidence continues to accumulate, it becomes increasingly clear that ‘global warming’ hysteria is based on a combination of bad science and fraud.” It turns out that the climate is getting colder.

 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

4 posted on 11/24/2008 9:26:43 AM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
What is so expensive about President Bush's ranch?

I'm guessing that most average people couldn't afford to build a house with all of the environmentally friendly mechanical systems that "W" had built into his.

most of that stuff costs multiple times what conventional systems do.

5 posted on 11/24/2008 9:32:43 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

I thought GW Bush ranch was a modest home that was simply built.


6 posted on 11/24/2008 9:33:33 AM PST by svcw (Great selection of Christmas gift baskets: http://baskettastic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith

The Environmental movement isn’t even about saving the environment. It is all about political control, and yes it is determined to bankrupt the little guy, as that is the best way to control him.


7 posted on 11/24/2008 9:34:54 AM PST by Getagrip19 (Control not conservation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

It’s not one or the other. We certainly need to assess the cost of environmental measures, but the greenies aren’t as evil as they’re often made out to be. Ask anyone who was in Bejing for the olympics about out of control pollution.

Which naturally brings us to the real problem: This isn’t something that the USA can fix on it’s own. There are far worse offenders than us, and they need to be at least brought up to our standards before we even contemplate further measures.


8 posted on 11/24/2008 9:35:23 AM PST by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Getagrip19

Bingo!


9 posted on 11/24/2008 9:36:05 AM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: svcw

It is- or was
I’m guessing if there is a lot of “green” upgrades to his ranch (which looks like a doublewide to me!)
it was to pander to those folks across the aisle and their enviro nazi interest groups who hated him and hate him still

But I want to read more about Algor’s 100 foot houseboat and how many common people own those


10 posted on 11/24/2008 9:49:42 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

The ranch in Crawford is a completely self-sustantained, off the grid, eco marvel. It cycles 25,000 gallons of rainwater, solar power, geothermal heating, grey-water usage et al. It’s hardly unpretentious from a green standpoint. It would make Ed Bagely jealous.


11 posted on 11/24/2008 9:51:47 AM PST by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Except he had the ranch before he was president.


12 posted on 11/24/2008 9:53:59 AM PST by svcw (Great selection of Christmas gift baskets: http://baskettastic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AJKauf

Yet not a word about Dianne Feinstein’s mansion in Pacific Heights.


13 posted on 11/24/2008 10:12:41 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Exactly. And as long as we make it too expensive for companies to do business in the U.S., they will continue to ship work to places where environmental regulations are few. And the planet as a whole will be worse off.


14 posted on 11/24/2008 10:17:42 AM PST by informavoracious (It's after midnight, I'm FReepwalking...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Melas

I don’t think it’s off the grid, but it does have some pretty good “sensible” measures.

I’d love to be able to use my greywater to water the lawn, which Bush does. Geo-thermal seems to be one of the smartest things to come around in a long while, but you need some property to make it work.

Those are smart things to conserve the resources but not the insanity that envirwacko’s want to have that cost far more than they will ever save.


15 posted on 11/24/2008 10:58:43 AM PST by cyclotic (Is Michelle Obama really Rita X?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Melas

“Ask anyone who was in Bejing for the olympics about out of control pollution.”

This is the real problem, people are confusing polution with CO2, which is an essential element of life. Its quite deliberate, too. Because America and most of the developed world had already reduced polution dramatically (you can do that when your economy has developed to the point of being able to afford it) the eco-nazis couldn’t go after that any more, so they demonized CO2, which would have the benefit (for them) of both weakening the developed economies and gaining total control over them. Just wait to see what sort polution there’ll be if economic growth is stymied and people are scrounging for a living. Environmental purity will be the last thing on their minds!


16 posted on 11/24/2008 12:44:03 PM PST by Nipfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson