You have your position and it is contradicted by the data both you and I have sourced.
Your two specific claims about DNA are contradicted by the data. More similar animals will not have more similar DNA in the case of chimps and gorillas, new world and old world vultures, and many other examples. And despite your attempt at selective quotation of a paper, both the paper you sourced and I clearly tell you that chimps and humans are more similar to each other in DNA than either is to a gorilla.
Obviously you are having problems reconciling the truth that God has put before us in terms of DNA sequence data, and your preposterous claims to know God's mind enough to declare reality to be a “logical impossibility”.
Thanks for the laughs. :)
Wrong.
==You have your position and it is contradicted by the data both you and I have sourced.
Wrong again.
==And despite your attempt at selective quotation of a paper, both the paper you sourced and I clearly tell you that chimps and humans are more similar to each other in DNA than either is to a gorilla.
Your inability to comprehend a straightforward reading of your fellow Temple of Darwin fanatics is almost as bad as your inability to comprehend a straightforward reading of Genesis. As I mention in my last reply, the authors admit that (A) apes are closer to humans than to chimps in a considerable fraction of single genes (B) that this is in conflict with the Evo human-chimp catechism and (C) that this leaves open the possibility (from a Darwiniac perspective) that humans and chimps diverged from apes, but not from each other. If you think this is not what the authors of this paper are saying, then may I suggest that the Darwiniac worms have ate too much of your brain.