Posted on 11/26/2008 11:07:48 PM PST by FreeAtlanta
There are hundreds of other current topics of discussion on FR this month, why are you compelled to make a remark that is discouraging and naught else, when you could pursue other topics -- the very topics you claim to care for?
I sent a FAX to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas asking them to require Obama to prove that he is an American citizen. I, for one, don’t believe that Obama is eligible to serve as President.
The FAX number is (202) 479-2971
http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244
Besides, if he was actually born in Hawaii under the name Barry Soerto(sp) and didn't legally change his name to Barak Obama (he thought it was cool?), then he committed fraud. It might be a technicality, but he can't be president.
“Democrats” and other liars have found that taking over a good name and using it for the opposite, is a succesful political tactic.... if not a GOOD one.
And therein lies our greatest challenge, in my opinion.
We conservatives have no deficiency of passion. What we lack is organization and focus. Think of the power that would be generated if the hundreds of online and offline activist groups, and their hundreds of thousands of members were organized under one umbrella group, with all of their efforts co-ordinated and focused into managed campaigns. It'd be un-stoppable.
Personally, I think that we're simply dispersed. We all innately sense that we are the real power in this nation, so why are the juveniles and moonbats in charge? They're better organized than we are. That's all.
You said,”...in reponse to a report published by the New York Times.”........
Wow! what do you know...the Congress now creates legislation in response to a TABLOID RAG..shocking!
You said,”...in reponse to a report published by the New York Times.”........
Wow! what do you know...the Congress now creates legislation in response to a TABLOID RAG..shocking!
The Naturalization Act of 1790 was repealed in 1795. Therefore, John McCain is still included in Donofrio’s suit as being ineligible.
http://hubpages.com/hub/Supreme-Court-Justices-Consider-Obama-Eligibility
Loved the Pic...I’m still laughing!
The SCOTUS should nullify the election, do the whole thing over, whatever it takes to satisfy the constitution.
NO.
It is true that the Naturalization act of 1795 superseded the 1790 act, but it didn’t change the citizenship implications of childeren of citizens born abroad as established by the prior act. Per the 1795 act(Sec. 3):
“...and the children of citizens of the United States, born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of the United States...”
Citizenship definition is not in the Constitution. What makes citizenship a Constitutional issue is the citizenship requirement for a president. That was not changed and is still the same constitutional requirement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.