Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Made in America' must make a comeback
The Christian Science Monitor ^ | November 28, 2008 | Paul Sedan

Posted on 11/27/2008 6:51:36 PM PST by kellynla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: kellynla
Those who are bashing unions are missing the point. Re-read the article again and understand the context of what the author is saying.

Unions themselves might be scum, but the people who work in them know how to use tools and understand manufacturing. How many of us took wood-shop classes in middle or high school, for example? Today, these classes don't exist. Schools don't want to be held liable by parents, the money is re-allocated to other BS courses, or kids just aren't interested in doing these things and can't wait to play their Wii when they get home. I'm not saying the taxes, bad trade policies, regulations, and the unions don't play a part in our erosion of manufacturing, because they do, but this generation of kids just aren't risk-takers and thinkers like the previous generations.

21 posted on 11/27/2008 7:13:59 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
It also used to be that Americans liked to make stuff.

We STILL like to make stuff. It's just that our AMERICAN friends and neighbors like to buy cheaper stuff from China.

22 posted on 11/27/2008 7:14:55 PM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
How friendly is our country to business? The skill and ingenuity is certainly here, but the cost of labor, taxes and other business expenses are too high compared to other countries. Why else would a company go elsewhere? Lose the unions and get back to employment being just that, employment, rather than making the employers pay for all manner of health insurance, retirement and other non-business programs.
23 posted on 11/27/2008 7:15:36 PM PST by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Developing countries (Such as the US at the time of its founding) may need protecting but not the world’s only superpower.

Something is very wrong when our best math students look like idiots compared to the rest of the world. Tariffs merely hide our fundamental weaknesses, but not for very long.


24 posted on 11/27/2008 7:15:47 PM PST by ari-freedom (Thank you for everything!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy; kellynla

I hold a doctorate in statistics from one of the top three departments in the world. My thesis was written under the supervision of a former chair of the University of Chicago department of statistics. I have hobnobbed with nobel laureates and assorted historical persons, some who are knighted MBE.

The reason I say all this is not to boast but to get you to believe that I have done my homework thoroughly to understand the solution to the topic of this thread is written into H.R. 25, the FairTax legislation (http://www.fairtax.org).

If you are really truly interested in the topic of this thread, then:

1. Study the link I gave above, especially the FAQ.

2. Study the history of taxation in American beginning with the Founder’s rationale and basis for taxation.

3. Study the rise of the Income tax beginning in the Civil War, its development and culmination in the 16th Amendment including key judicial rulings before 1913.

4. Study the five major tax reforms since 1913 and why they have each failed.

5. Understand as completely as possible the existence of federal embedded taxes in the prices of retail products and services.

6. Study the historical flaw of the regressive excise taxes used to fund America before 1913. Understand how this led to class warfare and Marxist populism.

7. Understand how the ‘Rebate’ of H.R. 25 corrects the flaw in item 6 above and why it was not possible to implement in 1913 or thereafter until only recently.

If you study and begin to understand the items above, you will be on your way to answering how the American manufacturing base can experience a great revival by an immediate 20+% drop in the price of American goods and services exported abroad, making it hugely competitive on a global scale. All of this is possible and practically done through real true tax reform in H.R. 25.


25 posted on 11/27/2008 7:16:42 PM PST by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
Financing a union is no different. All that money goes into organized crime as well as the Democrat party.

True, but without the poison. I don't like the unions as what they have turned into and who they support. My comment was more to the point of Chinese made products and their danger.

26 posted on 11/27/2008 7:18:34 PM PST by YellowRoseofTx (Evil is not the opposite of God; it's the absence of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Wolfhound777

Maybe that’s the point of the article? “We need to make stuff, not turn out more English literature majors.”


27 posted on 11/27/2008 7:19:19 PM PST by ari-freedom (Thank you for everything!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Where do I start with this “regular guy” macro-economic analysis?

The populist suspicion of “middle men” and “bankers” is redolent in this article. There is nothing inherently bad or wrong in creating global value chains as American business has been compelled to do by an extremely hostile regulatory and legal environment. In most cases American businesses have out sourced in order to avoid the high expense and uncertainty of doing business domestically.

I would ask the author of this article to direct his attention to the environmental lobby, the trail lawyers and bureaucrats in the EPA who have made manufacturing and energy production an unknowable gamble in this country.


28 posted on 11/27/2008 7:19:56 PM PST by ggekko60506
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

There are obvious problems with the unions but the anti union rhetoric and fantasy around here is starting to exceed the hysteria we hear from the left over global warming.

I don’t dispute the cost of union labor but I do dispute who is at fault. A lot of that cost is insurance and is the fault of the insurers. As far as retirement funds are concerned, I want to see how they compare to white collar workers with those same companies.

My neighbor was a low level exec with Chrysler when he retired before 50 years old. When he was working he picked up a nice 6 figure salary for smacking golf balls on the driving range while he was “working”. Add his 4 and a half months of paid vacation every year to the monster bonus and perpetual medical covereage he got upon retirement and it’s a chunk. He estimated his own costs at several times what it cost to employ a lineworker. He was one of dozens like him at the proving ground.


29 posted on 11/27/2008 7:21:46 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
>> but this generation of kids ...

exactly - see #10 and see #17
30 posted on 11/27/2008 7:21:55 PM PST by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
American Craftsmanship bump
31 posted on 11/27/2008 7:21:57 PM PST by tomkat ( . . heirloom hardwood handmirrors . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

The biggest union and the only ones growing today are government unions.

They don’t know how to make anything.

Many non-government union members don’t know how to make anything. Longshoremen may know how to rig certain gear, that’s not making anything.


32 posted on 11/27/2008 7:22:07 PM PST by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Part of the thrust of the modern educational system is that pretty much *everyone* goes through a college-prep curriculum in high school. This is just insanity.

If you look at the Germans, for example, they still have a very strong vocational training system that starts in those years. Not everyone needs a college-prep education, and the country would be much better off if more kids got vo-tech training instead of many of the junk college degrees being handed out these days in semi-useless majors like Sociology or Womyn’s Studies.


33 posted on 11/27/2008 7:22:34 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Obama: Carter's only chance to avoid going down in history as the worst U.S. president ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

do a google search for made in USA clothing and you will see lots of sites, the cost in not to bad and I have had good luck with the quailty. some are union some are non union so give it a try.


34 posted on 11/27/2008 7:23:44 PM PST by chemengineer42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
It is much easier to replace poor-quality non-union workers than it is to replace poor-quality union workers.

That and political fundraising are my two biggest issues with the unions. As a union worker myself the "I don't get paid to do that" attitude of some of my coworkers was infuriating.
35 posted on 11/27/2008 7:24:53 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Please...our college grads today with dream of Obama “Hope” in their heads and their sense of entitlement to our tax money to support them, I highly doubt we’ll return to our hard working manufacturing prowess. Short of another American Revolution to return government to the people based on the principles found in the United States Constitution, we are screwed.


36 posted on 11/27/2008 7:26:33 PM PST by Wolfhound777 (It's not our job to forgive them. Only God can do that. Our job is to arrange the meeting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

>> It is much easier to replace poor-quality non-union workers than it is to replace poor-quality union workers.

Poor-quality corporate directors are perhaps a greater threat to Capitalism.


37 posted on 11/27/2008 7:28:16 PM PST by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Wolfhound777
george carlin explains "stuff"
38 posted on 11/27/2008 7:28:38 PM PST by robomatik ((wine plug: renascentvineyards.com cabernet sauvignon, riesling, and merlot))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Posted #18 before I read your reply. I think it speaks to the same problem you described.
39 posted on 11/27/2008 7:31:26 PM PST by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Scratch that #18. I meant #37 which points the finger at the corporate directors.


40 posted on 11/27/2008 7:33:26 PM PST by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson