I noticed that, too.
I find it very interesting and more than a bit hypocritical that those who vocalize most about their rights to do what they want, when they want, and nobody can tell them what to do, are the very ones who don't have a problem telling others what to do (stay home if I *don't like it*)
Not liking it has nothing to do with it. If it were just a matter of preference, that would be the option.
But where does the guy who is able to live life to the fullest and enjoy himself everywhere he goes with no problems get off telling others that if what HE does bothers them they get to just stay home and suck it up?
Those of us who suffer have jobs to go to, doctor appointments, shopping, banking, bill paying, etc. Who's going to do that for us? The guy who's blowing me off and free to go anywhere he wants? I don't see that happening.
It's rights for me but not for thee. And then they wonder why people resort to lawsuits to push back.
Clueless......
This is a re-post of comment #98
http://detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081127/METRO/811270375
Longer article in the Detroit Paper:
“”He dismissed McBride’s claims that her chemical sensitivity also impairs her ability to shop for detergents, speak, interact with others, and reproduce.””
Yowsa!!
So what is the end game?
Government regulation against every odor that might offend, annoy or harm someone?
No end in sight is there.