Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

War Crimes and Other Misdemeanors [Vietnam, do NOT read unless prepared to be angered]
Chicago Reader ^ | December, 2008 | Michael Miner

Posted on 12/04/2008 4:31:32 PM PST by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: marron
Oh, here's another good one, just to help establish the level of credibility. Counterinsurgency never works, you always lose.

She must be right. Should an Aztlan insurgency arise, we'll all go back to Europe, blacks to Africa.

Where we'll submit to the various Muslim insurgencies.

No one is bothering the Eskimos, are they?

41 posted on 12/04/2008 5:39:21 PM PST by SJackson (http://www.jewish-history.com/emporium/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I haven’t conceded her point at all. I don’t believe that it was institutional at all. My point again, is even if it was, so what. We didn’t go there first.


42 posted on 12/04/2008 5:40:09 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Never underestimate the ability of a liberal to deny reality and attempt to change the rules to do s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

I understand


43 posted on 12/04/2008 5:41:36 PM PST by SJackson (http://www.jewish-history.com/emporium/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Early one morning, I led my platoon into a Montagnard Village that we had visited the day before. From our ambush position, we had heard firing that seemed to be coming from the village and we rucked up to investigate.

I found the village chief and his wife, with whom I had shared a meal and discussed local events. They had both been beheaded and hung upside down outside their hooch. Their heads were stuck on stakes driven into the ground in front of the hooch. Inside were two young children, about 3 and 4 years of age. Their intestines were protruding from the wounds in their sides caused by the explosion of a grenade thrown into the hooch. They were still alive and remained so when they got to the evac hospital in Pleiku. My medic and I treated and comforted them on the flight back. They both died on the operating table.

That’s what happened to you when you cooperated with the Americans and the VC/NVA cadre found out about it.

This disgusting, worthless, communist b!tch can stick it where the Sun doesn’t shine. Words cannot express how much I detest slime like her.


44 posted on 12/04/2008 5:44:07 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

I think we should invite her to the wall in Washington DC, gather all those that fought in Nam and all those that were in the military during that period and have her read her book out loud!!


45 posted on 12/04/2008 5:48:24 PM PST by USAF70 (I'm a bitter clinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rannug; SJackson; Ouderkirk; SandRat
About Kerry's Silver Star.

There are varied reports about the action Kerry's boat saw that night. Kerry's account described his boat coming under attack with an RPG barely missing, whereupon Kerry ordered the craft onto the shore, jumped off a pursued a fleeing VC carrying an RPG 40. He shot him (in the back) and led the charge to secure the area.

Crew members and Lt John O'Neill, commanding another boat, reported that there was very little weapons fire that night and that Kerry ran his boat into the shore and fired at a fleeing VN from a nearby vil killing him. The VN was identified as Ba Thang by the other villagers. Ba is an appellation given to the 'Second Son' thus Thang was known in the village as Ba Thang, not to be confused with the Vietnamese title Bà given married women.

Too bad for Ba Thang setting up an ambush on the river so near his vil in the evening when fishing is best and bagging a Silver Star for Kerry.

The AAR was written up and submitted by Lt jg Kerry. Actually all of the AARs during Kerry's four months in country were written and submitted by Kerry himself.
46 posted on 12/04/2008 6:15:05 PM PST by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I consider war to be hell and any and all means are on the table. Women and children are acceptable military targets in a war zone.

The family of the soldiers or guerrilas who are shooting at you are absolutely acceptable targets. That enemy soldier needs to consider the fate of his family as he decides to go to war. Whether they will be alive if he returns home. And if there will be anything left to return home to.

At what point did the homes and families of our enemies become untouchable?

While its a nice idea that women and children shouldn’t have to suffer in a war, but why shouldn’t they? Do they not enable the war to proceed. Supplying the enemy with moral support, provisions, and new recruits.

Absolutely they are targets. To be dispatched as collateral damage. There homes should be destroyed their crops and livestock are to be destroyed as well. If an enemy solder has the welfare of his family on his mind it makes him much less effective and if he has no provisions and follow-on soldiers there is no relief for him.

So, I don’t consider what was done, if anything, as an atrocity. It is the collateral damage of any war. My Lai was collateral damage and a message to other VC collaborator villages, to not support the VC or risk the same fate. Why is this a war crime or an atrocity. Sounds like Gen. Sherman’s march to the sea. Scorched earth is how wars are won.

Just my view of things. But I’m an “all in to win” kind of person. If I’m not all in, I’m out. I don’t do things halfway and I don’t pussyfoot around.

The author and those who think like her, want sanitized war, where civilians go about their lives unmolested as the war rages about them. That women and children suffer the most during war, that they are innocent. Yes they do suffer most, as they should, but they are far from innocent. They are as much a cog in any war machine. Rosie the Riveter anyone?

During WW2 the soldiers were drafted for the duration. Those who were drafted in 1945 were children when the war broke out in 1941


47 posted on 12/04/2008 6:16:47 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Never underestimate the ability of a liberal to deny reality and attempt to change the rules to do s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

Thanks, I remember that now. I don’t have a problem with shooting the guy in the back. I think I recall the VC was wounded, but I still don’t have a problem. I respect the fact that he showed up, but that quickly fades. The guy sickens me.


48 posted on 12/04/2008 6:31:24 PM PST by SJackson (http://www.jewish-history.com/emporium/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
I hope you understand that it's not that I necessarily disagree with what you've said, other than My Lai which was criminal . But in the context of the thread, unless and until the author proves her contension of systemic atrocities, My Lai wasn't systemic, your reasoning is irrelevant, so I'm hesitant to address it.

Collateral damage and war crimes are quite different, both in intent and scope. IMO the authors charges are unfounded.

49 posted on 12/04/2008 6:38:09 PM PST by SJackson (http://www.jewish-history.com/emporium/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Troll alert!!!!
50 posted on 12/04/2008 8:25:12 PM PST by SuperLuminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Well, I was born about 7 miles from that very interchange and spent the next 21 years there (miss it every day)... I assure you that it wasn’t always that way. Once Dell took off it seemed like there was an influx of Californians overnight.

Enjoy your trip and watch out for the hippies... they do attack when provoked.


51 posted on 12/05/2008 1:19:51 AM PST by Shady Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
IMO the authors charges are unfounded.

Yes, they are unfounded.

True to liberal form the author is trying to resurrect an issue for personal gain and little else. This is not a subject that she cares deeply about or has any vested interest in besides enriching herself.

If this were a scholarly work on the idea of war crimes in Vietnam it would examine the NVA as well as the VC. This book is just this authors attempt to shake the money tree to see if anything falls out.

52 posted on 12/05/2008 6:10:18 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Never underestimate the ability of a liberal to deny reality and attempt to change the rules to do s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Well maybe, in a general way, but I can’t think of the Pulitzer without thinking of “columnist” Leonard Pitts, who won a Pulitzer merely for being a black liberal when he can barely write a coherent sentence, and his only theme is “Whitey be pickin’ on me”. The column he wrote when his nephew got arrested (at Leonard’s house) was a masterpiece of black outrage.


53 posted on 12/05/2008 12:50:58 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
Know where you are coming from Brother, did a couple of sweeps when the School Teachers left late, not mice.
54 posted on 12/05/2008 1:09:46 PM PST by Little Bill (Just a Poor White Person , clinging to God, Guns, and the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Later....

I’d like to know the names of those interviewed, bet it’s the same VVAW bastards that lied in the 70’s.


55 posted on 12/05/2008 1:17:10 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (It's no longer the Press Van, it's a "Tanker" Truck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Winter Soldier's basic premise was that American policies caused all troops to become baby killing war criminals.

There's only one case that I know of where any of the Winter Soldier bastards was ever under oath. That was a few years ago in connection with the Stolen Honor lawsuit.

The creep was under oath and had to admit that the war crime he committed was NOT due to American military policies, but was in fact a personal act of revenge because of the death of a friend.

Winter Soldier was a lie. Q.E.D.

56 posted on 12/05/2008 1:23:13 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (It's no longer the Press Van, it's a "Tanker" Truck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The IVAW’s own Winter Soldier “testimony” is also collateral damage rather than true war crimes.

War is brutal and they focus on that and call it a war crime. And they are lying bastards because they know the difference and still spread the Big Lie.

They’ll never condem all war as a crime, just the ones America might win.


57 posted on 12/05/2008 1:26:42 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (It's no longer the Press Van, it's a "Tanker" Truck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson