Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama birth battle goes to Supreme Court
Chicago Times ^ | December 7, 2008 | Tim Jones

Posted on 12/07/2008 6:36:30 PM PST by Red Steel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 last
To: MrB

No, because I think America deserves full disclosure of its President. However, if the SCOTUS rules that he is in fact Constitutionally elegible for the office then of course he can be inaugurated on 1/20. The doubt and conspiracy about what exists or doesn’t exist on his vault copy of the BC is sure to prove a divisive point to a President that ran on being able to bring the country together as a transformational figure, don’t you think?


101 posted on 12/08/2008 6:43:10 AM PST by tomnbeverly (Doing time on the Obama Plantation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Wil H

So what we have is either the Tribune lied..which i will give them the benefit of the doubt for the moment...

or Janice overstepped her bounds..and the law..in order to try to get Obama elected as this was released before the election.

I really think you should send this to interested parties like Donofrio and WND.


102 posted on 12/08/2008 7:10:04 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson