Comments?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I’m a social conservative so I’m not qualified to speak on behalf of my betters.
2 posted on
12/08/2008 7:15:56 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Today's Republican Party seeks to advance freedom through limited government, strong national security, personal responsibility and traditional family values."
The current Republican Party does not believe or promote ANY of the above. Strong national security is probably the one issue with the most support, but pretending to support any of the rest is laughable considering the recent record.
3 posted on
12/08/2008 7:19:57 PM PST by
penowa
To: 2ndDivisionVet
will remind us all too clearly that the principles which unite us are far greater than those that divide us. I yam where I yam. In the bus or under it -- not my decision.
4 posted on
12/08/2008 7:20:58 PM PST by
sionnsar
(Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Republican Party is strong enough to stand on principle and broad enough to accept that sometimes more than one road may lead to that destination. ROFLOLOLOLOLOLOL, now pull my other leg.
"Principle" in the same sentence with "Republican" and no negation to be seen anywhere? For "Republican" to come to mean even a shadow of what it once meant, you need to frog-march the current leadership piggish rulers out to the gallows and hang them. Slowly.
Please forgive me for holding back on my opinion...
6 posted on
12/08/2008 7:26:15 PM PST by
Clint Williams
(Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | Impeach Obama!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The problem with the GOP is that they're ignoring the fiscal conservatives and small-l libertarians. I obviously have no problem with them promoting pro-life and pro-traditional marriage views, and no funding for stem-cell research. But the GOP lately has been putting social issues front and center. All that does is turning off the two aforementioned groups, and it also explains why both of Bush's presidential victories were by razor-thin margins.
Again, I am not in favor of social liberalism because it never works with fiscal conservatism. Fiscal & social conservatism should and can compliment one another. If you cut taxes and limit the size of gov't, local communities will take up the slack and help those in need. Ditto for private religious groups. But if the GOP continues to promote the Drug War, gov't-funded faith-based charities, online poker and gambling bans, then they're going to keep losing elections.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Hey, I didn't know Mark had become a syndicated columnist! I've met him many times. A real nice, solidly conservative pol. He was a longtime statehouse rep from Burlington, on the eastern border of Colorado, and rose to Majority Leader. After term limits forced his retirement, he ran for State Treas in '06 but lost in a squeaker.
Go get 'em, Mark!
11 posted on
12/08/2008 8:07:22 PM PST by
CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC
(If my kids make a mistake in the voting booth, I don't want them punished with a community organizer)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
You think we have it hard on the right, trying to get 3 voting blocs together and on the same page?
Try being a left winger. 30+ something constituencies who are all angry and miserable and unhappy and want Gubmint to take up their grievance.....and they have nothing in common except a desire for Big Gubmint.
12 posted on
12/08/2008 8:29:47 PM PST by
Eric Blair 2084
(Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“So why do some vocal social moderates and libertarians find it so difficult to coexist with social conservatives? “
One is hard and one is easy.
14 posted on
12/08/2008 11:01:41 PM PST by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade, There are only two sides. Pick one.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
Social moderates who say they just want government to "stay out of it" will soon be tested. Will they vociferously oppose restrictions on religious speech, taxpayer funding of abortion, and federal legislation to pre-empt state laws on abortion and marriage? Emphatically, "Yes!"
Now, will social conservatives embrace commerce, free markets, and a truly limited government. Will they stop venturing into envorinmentalism, at least be skeptical of unions, do their best to not spout class envy, and, finally, agree to get behind desperately needed entitlement reforms?
15 posted on
12/09/2008 2:30:21 AM PST by
LowCountryJoe
(Do class-warfare and disdain of laissez-faire have their places in today's GOP?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
16 posted on
12/09/2008 4:06:37 PM PST by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; 185JHP; 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; ...
17 posted on
12/09/2008 4:12:03 PM PST by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson