Behold the unbridled purity of opto-rectal vision.
I'll just let my peers here judge the validity and strength of my points and assertions vs. your intellectual snail trail. You are exposed, humiliated, and nullified, shill.
Posted on 12/13/2008 10:31:50 AM PST by ckilmer
No, the burden of proof is on the person making the wild allegations. I can understand your unwillingness to prove your case, however, as you have absolutely NO proof. Your strawman that it’s Obama’s job to take time out of his schedule to respond to your ridiculous assertions may work on your fellow idiot conspiracy theorists, but it doesn’t work in the world of reality.
That's right, like someone who says "I am a natural born citizen and therefore qualified to be President" but refuses to release his birth certificate, passport(s), school transcripts, or any supporting evidence.
The only thing creepier and more pathetic is a boot-licking brain-dead knee-jerk automaton who spends his time (paid or volunteer) mindlessly gainsaying every valid point or question with the same dull attempted redefinition and misrepresentation in defense of his Dark Lord's evasions.
Know anyone like that?
Refuses to acknowledge that one has the responsibility to back up one’s absurd ideas, shifts that responsibility to others. Absolutely cannot be moved from that asinine position.
When called on it, goes into the classic DU tactic of accusing opponent of being a paid operative.
On FR for barely over a month, pushing conspiracy theories which do nothing but embarrass FR.
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, my guess is that it's a troll.
Behold the unbridled purity of opto-rectal vision.
I'll just let my peers here judge the validity and strength of my points and assertions vs. your intellectual snail trail. You are exposed, humiliated, and nullified, shill.
Exposed, humiliated, nullified shill? If those adjectives apply to anyone, they apply to a person who goes around making outlandish claims, steadfastly refuses to provide any evidence for why he/she would believe such a thing, demands that the person that they accuse (based on zero evidence) be the one to provide evidence, even though that person already has. Give it up troll.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.