[Piquaboy]

If he were white, would that have happened?

[Constitution Day]

Sadly not surprised...the fix is in.

[PGalt]

Thanks for posting.

[MarkT]

Alan Keyes certainly has standing - they should recognize his claim.

[Frantzie]

Digusting. I guess SCOTUS prefers tyranny. I thought Robrts, Scalia, Alito and Thmas cared more about the Republic - I guess they could not be bothered.

Soro’s son had an editorial in today’s Wall Street Journal (now a rag paper) on why the Electorial College needs to be scrapped. He said NJ, IL, MD and HI are already there.

[ichabod1]

The constitution is null and void and none of us are bound by it.

[seekthetruth]

No. 08A469
Title: Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant
v.
Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State

Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Case Nos.: (SC 18264)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 26 2008 Application (08A469) denied by Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 29 2008 Application (08A469) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 8 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2008.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A469) referred to the Court by Justice Scalia.
Dec 9 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Cort Wrotnowski filed. (Distributed)

---

WHERE DOES IT SAY DENIED????

[ctdonath2]

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

08A469 WROTNOWSKI, CORT V. BYSIEWICZ, CT SEC. OF STATE
The application for stay and/or injunction addressed to Justice Scalia and referred to the Court is denied.

[Old Sarge]

Welcome to

[LibertyRocks]

Not surprising, but disappointing nonetheless.

[snowsislander]

I wonder what is happening with the Berg case? The docket seems to show that it is still active:

No. 08-570	
Title: 	
Philip J. Berg, Petitioner
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed:	October 31, 2008
Lower Ct:	United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  Case Nos.:	(08-4340)
	Rule 11

~~~Date~~~ 	~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008 	Petition for a writ of certiorari before
judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008 	Application (08A391) for an injunction
pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of
certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 	Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J.
Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 	Application (08A391) denied by Justice
Souter.
Nov 18 2008 	Waiver of right of respondents Federal
Election Commission, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 1 2008 	Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed
by respondent Bill Anderson.
Dec 8 2008 	Application (08A505) for an injunction
pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of
certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 	Application (08A505) denied by Justice
Souter.

[mkjessup]

Boy, I’m sure glad Bush put those two solid Constitution-revering conservatives Roberts and Alito on the SCOTUS, aren’t you?

Oops.

[o_zarkman44]

Judicial tyranny ignores the Constitution. If they are unwilling to COMPEL OBAMA TO SHOW US HIS PAPERS, how will the constitutional process proceed from this point on?

[MountainWoman]

i knew this was going to happen...but i still had hope...unfortunately we can’t count on the SCOTUS doing us any favors...the whole Blago scandal could be promising and has definately tainted 0, but i think we all know that this joker is probably going to be inaugurated...but this is what i’ve been thinking lately...

the only reason i voted for McCain was because of Sarah Palin. if he would have been elected, it would have been disastrous—he would have been thier pawn either way...we wouldn’t have had a chance for atleast another 12 years probably. 0 is going to try and do some bad things to this country, but what is done can be undone.

my brother has a book on survival—the author’s first instruction is to banish ALL negative thoughts from your head or you’re toast...i know it’s hard to stay positive in times like these, but atleast we aren’t alone—we have eachother to stay sane and laugh every now and then—we may not see instant karma in this lifetime...but sometimes that’s the lesson...

[RobFromGa]

What are you basing this on? It appears alive to me...

[so_real]

Denied without word or explanation? Up to now I’ve defended the SCOTUS. I figured they were moving slowly and stealthily to build a perfectly crafted statement one way or the other. After this, I’m not so sure that is the case. They do appear to be ignoring the issue outright. We very well discover the Constitution is irrelevant at the present time; and that we live in a Federal Democracy rather than a Constitutional Republic. Maybe the New Order will be so kind as to chisel off a Constitutional Reservation for us somewhere ...

[freekitty]

Thanks Justices for reaffirming America and it’s people mean nothing.

[stockpirate]

PING.

[BP2]

His stay — yes

His case — no

The way I read this is:

a) the SCOTUS doesn't want to have a conflict with the Constitutional powers of Congress

b) they think that in light of ALL of the Immigration Acts they think that Obama is ACTUALLY a NBC

c) even if they doubt Obama’s credentials, they can't override Hawaii's state laws that allow a 'CertificATION of Live Birth" as prima facia proof of birth (perhaps only a suit in Hawaii can do that)

d) they can't act until BO commits a crime, after the EC votes are counted in Congress on Jan. 8!

[davek70]

Constitution is dead as we know it. Thanks for the help Roberts, Alito, Thomas, and Scalia. USSA only a matter of time.

BTW, I was reading on Leo’s blog last night something about the court clerk holding back briefs and something about a claim that white powder was in the brief envelope?? Does anyone know about that stuff?? Leo was kind of rambling about it and I could not find the start of the story.