Skip to comments.Broe v. Reed: Motion for Expedited Discovery, Subpoenas (Obama's Washington case)
Posted on 12/16/2008 6:54:14 AM PST by BP2
Broe v. Reed: Motion for Expedited Discovery, Subpoenas December 16th, 2008
Yesterday, DecaLogosIntl.org reported that James Broe, one of 13 Plaintiffs in Broe v. Reed, has filed a motion for expedited discovery and authority to issue subpoenas in Washington State Supreme Court:
Names and Designation of Persons Filing Motion
COMES NOW, James E. Broe, Kenneth R. Seal, Robert Baker, Mark Sussman, Stan Walter, Bill Wise, Andy Stevens, Ed Crawford, Jason Lagen, Louise Workman, Jocelyn Murcelli, Mike Murcelli and Kevin McDowell, by and through counsel of record Stephen Pidgeon, pursuant to RAP 17.3(a), the Rules of Discovery, CR 26-37, and CR 45 governing the issuance of subpoenas, and Move this Honorable Court for an order allowing the issuance of two subpoenas for the purpose of obtaining admissible evidence in this case, and expediting discovery pursuant to the proposed schedule.
Plaintiffs seek an Order allowing plaintiffs expedited discovery by means of two subpoenas, one to be served on the Secretary of State of the State of Washington, to discover the following items: I) the Declaration of Candidacy of Barack Obama as filed in the State of Washington; 2) all records concerning the candidacy and disallowance of Socialist Workers Party candidate Frank Colero within the Secretary of States office; and one to be served upon the Director of the Department of Health in the State of Hawaii, to discover the following items: 3) the Birth Certificate of Barack Obama in Hawaii, and 4) all supporting documentation regarding the registration of the birth of Barack Obama in Hawaii. Plaintiffs seek an order which establishes the following schedule.
Plaintiffs are to serve the Secretary of State of the State of Washington with a Subpoena in the form attached hereto as approved by the Court no later than the close of business on Friday, December 19, 2008, and responses shall be served upon Plaintiffs counsel Stephen Pidgeon no later than the close of business on December 28, 2008.
Plaintiffs are to serve the State of Hawaii Department of Health with a Subpoena in the form attached hereto as approved by the Court no later than the close of business on Monday, December 22, 2008, and responses shall be served upon Plaintiffs counsel. no later than the close of business on December 28, 2008.
More on the story here: http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1825
Very good news indeed!
Is it on the actual court calander? I doubt there will be oral arguments in the WA SC. It is the most corrupt state supreme court in the country and if you think they are going to follow the law, you are sadly mistaken.
“It is the most corrupt state supreme court in the country and if you think they are going to follow the law, you are sadly mistaken.”
So should we just stop and not try?
“Broe v. Reed” has a haunting ring to it.
Don’t sue me bro!
FYI: As a followup to the filing of a challenge to President-elect Obamas votes in Washington state, the state Supreme Court has set an en banc conference for Jan. 8.
This means all of the justices participate in deciding whether to take the case, not just a department (half the court) or, as more usual, just the court commissioner. The challengers, James Broi and 12 others, are represented by Bellevue attorney Stephen Pidgeon
So we sit and do nothing? Please, tell us what YOU are doing about this mess we're in.
Ping! Here is the link to the MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY:
Dont "STAY ME," Broe!
Dont "STAY ME," Broe!
Don't REED my birth records, BROE!
I am all for going after Obama’s constitutional qualifications for President.
When it comes to going after the corrupt justices on the WA SC, I take a back seat to NO ONE.
Thanks for the ping.
That is one of the most well-reasoned and well-written motions I’ve seen in these BC cases.
Coincidentally, I recently made a couple of posts about discovery and pre-action discovery in BC threads here.
I’d like to see a judge grant the motion and force the defendant to appeal or comply. of course, they’ll probably appeal, but it will be hard to show an abuse of discretion if the lower court writes a legally valid opinion.
Also, i think the media spin and perspective would have to change some if it came out that it is the “concealers” who are appealing and fighting this issue in the higher courts.
So what does this "going after" action include? How can we help?
My original post was based on my personal knowledge of the corruption withing the Washington State SC and the offices of governor and AG.
I'll be in the USSC sometime in the next two months, and they will accept my case. The other stuff I can't discuss right now.
And can you guess who plans to visit Hawaii on December 22?
Barack Obama that's who.
Please complete your “about” page here at FR with some background info on yourself and your interests.
And anyone else who has a blank page, please consider writing a line or two about yourself. Pictures of your hobbies, etc, are good too.
I believe that there is a similar case to this in California as well.
This it for Obama.
Obama has been recently hobnobbing with influential people in Hawaii in the first week of this month. He will be in Hawaii for Christmas starting on the 22nd Dec. He's shopping around for help. Obama needs an expertly made long form birth certificate.
Under the premise that Obama is screwed. Obama goes for it by throwing millions of dollars in leftover campaign funds to get the best help, a forger. The forger will need a blank form of the BC long form circa 1961. He'll have to find a doctor or mid-wife signature and a doctor or mid-wife to vouch for it.. so they'll likely forge the signature of a dead one. The mid-wife would be easier for the forger to do. No hospital to deal with. He'll need an old typewriter. After Obama's forger has a grade A forged BC, he will have to replace it with the real one locked away. A switch operation. The easiest way is to bribe the people who have access to his real long form BC to do the switch with the bogus document, and to change the related computer database to reflect the bogus BC information. Mission Impossible? ;-)
The question is will Obama pull it off, or will he even attempt it? Or is Obama in Hawaii only for the sunshine? Or is Obama secretly in love with Governor Linda Lingle? LoL!
That won't be hard. Finding a ribbon and paper from that long ago would be the real problem.
Well, often, the coverup becomes worse than the actual crime (See, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton's blue dress). Hopefully, all this will cripple any far left-wing agenda that the Democrats-corrupt jerks- have.
Yes, I predict if Obama survives his BC fiasco, he'll still have so many scandals flying around his head his communist agenda will suffer retardation.
Woo Hoo! “Don’t taze me bro!” Good news and more patriots not giving up. :-)
Leo liked Steve Pidgeon’s case but the problem may be WA state’s corruption. :-(
Best of luck to you and let us know if we can help. I have endless admiration for Leo, Cort, Orly, Pidgeon and others with the courage to stand up to the coup.
I read today in the WSJ that SCOTUS voted to allow a case of Gitmo terrorists that were subjected to harsh words. My guess is their pizzas at gitmo were not at the right temperature or the thread counts in the sheets were less than 700.
It seems like SCOTUS is more concerned with terrorists rights than citizens rights and the Constitution. I still have some faith in Scalia, thomas, Roberts and Alito.
... so Andy Martin files before the election on Oct. 18 (not his first motion, but his second motion):
Then Obama goes to Hawaii, presumably to visit Toot on Oct. 24:
Then Hawaii judge “conducts vigorous hearing on Obama birth certificate battle, reserves ruling” on Andy’s second filing, not closing it (takes it “under advisement) in mid-Nov:
About the same time in mid-Nov, Toots has a funeral service, which Obama doesn’t attend: http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Nov15/0,4670,ObamaGrandmother,00.html
Since then, Pidgeon’s case is accepted, and files emergency discovery: http://decalogosintl.org/documents/motion_to_expedite_discovery.pdf
Obama plans to celebrate Christmas in Hawaii, there on Dec. 22
The Washington Supreme Court hears oral arguments on Jan 8, the same day Congress meets to count the Electoral votes.
... dots for those who wish to connect them...
Say WA? Evergreen State ping
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.
Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.
Or, just copy the the Civil War II ping list and Gadsen's Flag picture off mine. It looks like we may need both soon!
I’m sorry I never could connect those dot puzzles. Can you spell it out for me? These state courts are coordinating? Obama is taking a suitcase full of cash to Hawaii to buy the judge? The race will be final before the first hearing is held?
The SC wiffed on this, right? What happene to Berg - dismissed, remanded back? What about the one that was last Friday. Did they dump it yesterday.
Someone needs to build a chart on the web with these.
I'm with you, Jack. Please help us understand, BP2, and anyone else having a reasoned analysis. I'd love to read your theories about these actions.
Prayers for you.
What Great News!!
Heard about this last night and wanted the details. Thanks for the details!
I believe there is more news to come that will begin to bring the truth to light!
Who said the WA SC is going to hear oral arguments on this case? En Banc does not necessarily mean there will be oral arguments.
I just called the WASC. There is an administrative conference on Januray 8 to consider the case. There will be no oral arguments on that date.
Because it is petition for a writ on mandamus against Reed, the WASC is required to issue a written decision addressing the law and the facts. On the other hand, just because the WA constitution requires that they issue a written opinion addressing the facts and the law does not mean they will actually do it.
This is promising! Continuing prayers for our country.
Thanks for the clarification on that, SeaHawkFan.
Myself and others are trying to help them where we can. The biggest concern is the discovery phase. But I think Steve’s got it covered — he’s coordinating with other attorneys on other cases in other states...
They don't just call this a Soviet Socialist state just because of the oversized, original statue of Lenin or the observance of atheism as a recognized religion, ya know.
Thanks for the pings STARWISE!
It does not matter if Washington Supreme court hears the case or not or when it will hear it. What is important is the order for discovery. If such order is granted, Steve Pidgeon will have a court order to gain access to the vault copy of 0bama BC. And if the vault copy shows what we think it will show, the news will spread like wild fire and it will be all over for 0bama or whatever his name is.
I have always said public pressure and not the justice system is the best course of action to finish the political life of a crooked politician.
Um, the language is from the plaintiffs’ application. No judge has signed the form of order yet, so why is this such good news? No one to whom the request is addressed has any obligation to do anything until and unless a judge signs the form of order, and there is no indication from anything I have seen here that that is going to happen...
MUST see ~~
A Message To Our Electors:
PING to video ~~
A Message To Our Electors:
Synopsis for those of us that are video challenged please. Thanks
Maybe, or maybe it will goad him into implementing as much as he can, as fast the hugely Democrat Congress will let him, before his political capital leaks away.
It’s excellent .. very well done. You can’t see videos?
Hope that’s not true ... what you miss .. ;(
It explains the duties of the electors, cautions them
that country comes before party, that party pressure
is illegal, that the country has a right to know and
that part of their duty is seeing to the eligibility
of the candidate.