[Las Vegas Ron]

Put state laws on the books that vet candidate or else they cannot be legally placed on the ballot.

The vetting argument is irrelevant and you can argue it all day long.

It does not change the fact he is probably ineligible to hold office.

[Star Traveler]

You said — “The vetting argument is irrelevant and you can argue it all day long. It does not change the fact he is probably ineligible to hold office.”

The fact of the matter is that you *do not know* — and that’s a problem of the vetting process. So, the *real problem* is that the vetting process is defective and needs to be corrected.

As I said before — it appears that not very many people are concerned about the “process” — but actually more concerned about knocking out Obama, specifically.

If you’re concerned about the Constitution (and not some individual, solitary candidate) then you’ll be concerned — primarily — about the process...

[LibLieSlayer]

It will not matter Ron... this Nation is on the fastrack to failure and when we restructure we can rest assured that the Constitution will be adhered to... the socialist state that will come from the split can make a new Constitution that will ensure and protect "their" messiah.

LLS