To: drjimmy
If a person does not use that argument, then bringing it up to argue against it is a straw argument.
I see you didn’t bring up the argument that zer0bama might be afraid of a misspelling on his longform birth certificate and it would prove embarrassing, so he’s expending 6 figures worth of resources to hide that misspelling. And, of course, that argument is completely bogus, here’s how... see how that works?
So why are you defending the usage of straw argumentation? Isn’t your intellectual position secure enough that you can use legitimate reasoning?
96 posted on
12/17/2008 10:23:49 AM PST by
Kevmo
( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
To: Kevmo
If a person does not use that argument, then bringing it up to argue against it is a straw argument.
Posts #3, 10, 17, 29, 39, 59, 77, 95 on this thread alone have used the argument that the Supreme Court must be corrupt for denying to hear this case. Dozens of comments on other threads concerning this issue over the past couple of weeks have said the same thing.
109 posted on
12/17/2008 10:36:59 AM PST by
drjimmy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson