Warren’s candor, Curry’s righteous liberal anger ping to Today show list.
I think one can safely assume that this lady is not an occasion of sin for Mr. Warren. Ugly from the inside out.
Ann Curry is a bimbo.
What exactly is "noteworthy" about this admission?
I use this example all the time. Just because my sexual orientation is to adultery does not mean the Episcopal Church should develop a rite for the blessing of the motel room keys.
In fact prostitution is not a right , two consenting adults. But in my county of Maryland same sex sex gives you special employment and housing rights.
Oh goodie, another Jimma Carter who lusts in his heart.
Then she pulls out her trump card. SCIENCE. The Left has supplanted their faith in God with faith in the latest madcap pronouncement of "Scientists". Curry's reverence for science as she delivers the following line is clear.
CURRY: If science finds that this is biological, that people are born gay, would you change your position?
Of course, all of the research into this area is agenda-driven. Homosexuality is proven conclusively by the academic scientific community to be in-born on every alternate Tuesday. Unfortunately, that conclusion does not jibe with the reality that so many homosexuals were the victims of childhood sexual abuse themselves, usually by an adult homosexual.
Of course, Warren side-steps the entire issue of scientifically determined predisposition elegantly, thus demonstrating again that he is several orders of magnitude more intelligent than Ann Curry...
WARREN: No, and the reason why is because we all have biological predispositions. I'm naturally inclined to have sex with every beautiful woman I see. But that doesn't mean it's the right thing to do.
One interesting thing in the edit. There is a significant pause in Warren's statement, right before he says "But that doesn't make it the right thing to do". During this pause they show a reaction shot from Curry. I would be very interested to know if this reaction shot was taped simultaneously with Warren's words, or if it is spliced in from a series of reaction shots taken after the interview is over.
If Warren did pause at that point and if Curry did react as if she were being flattered at that point, it would indicate that Warren was playing her like a fish. If, in fact, Warren did not pause and spoke without a break, he is still making a good point, but there is no flattery of Curry involved.
That sort of edit matters.
I am reminded of Bobby Knight's infamous interview with Connie Chung from a few years back. Chung asked Knight about refereees making bad calls or something, and Knight responded that it was like rape, and if you can't do anything about it, you should lie back and enjoy it. Knight then immidiately went on to make other outrageous statements, and never realized that Chung was offended.
Well, in the edit, they spliced a pause into Knight's sentence, and inserted a massive spit-take from Chung. The effect was to make Knight look even more boorish than he already is by failing to pick up on Chung's (non-existant) reaction to the outrageous thing he said.
I hope he came back with something like “Well, MOST good-looking women I meet.”
Reminds me of Mister Ed.
Ann wouldn't make the cut ...
I am so glad I quit watching the MSM a few years ago. I’d rather listen to nails scratching a chalkboard, than to listen to the likes of Ann Curry.
You want to make a difference in the world, turn off your TV, encourage others to do the same, and people like Ann Curry and her MSM buddies will disappear when companies see there already diminishing advertising dollars are being wasted to promote this garbage they call “news”.
“if it were established that people are born gay”
“Good morning, good morning, in the news this morning, good morning”
I prefer women with real eyebrows.
A couple of questions for Ann...
In “Nature,” when a new male lion takes over a pride, it will immediately kill all the cubs of the former pride leader. Since it’s “natural,” should a newly married man kill the young children of an ex-husband?
In “Nature,” it’s not uncommon for chimps to hunt other chimps, and often there is cannibalism. Since it’s “natural,” do be support the idea of eating human flesh?
Ann, honey... The thing that sets us apart from the animals in nature is our ability to decide NOT to follow our base desires, and become MORE than what nature has in store for us... That’s what makes us HUMAN.
Mark
When Media Liberals Attack!
I’ve used a similar argument. Also, when people say that we have to supply condoms to teenagers because “it would be stupid to think they won’t have sex”, I ask them what about the boy who is a nerd or is ugly and no girl will go out with him. We expect boys and men to refrain from sex if they can’t find a willing partner, so apparently it IS possible to refrain from sex.
Purpsoe Driven sex?