Posted on 12/27/2008 12:45:28 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Yes, they are afraid. They know that during her relatively brief time on the national stage, 35 million tuned in to see her acceptance speech, 74 million tuned in to see her debate Biden, and during the 80+ rallies she held with McCain or separately, hundreds of thousands turned out even after she was subject to the savaging of the media. Thousands more turned out to see her in Georgia. They know she resonates with a lot of people here in flyover country, and is developing quite a grassroots following. They have every reason to be afraid of her.
Yo! You mean the most admired woman, Hillary, isn't issuing a calendar also?
What a blow!
Yep, and these are the bastards that voted for Obama, nuff said. No wonder he won
Someone is trying to be clever.
Great point you make. It’s an outright shame the way Sarah was and still is being treated. But I’m glad most Americans love and admire her, no matter what the MSM and GOP snobs say about her.
bump
Judy Patrick was mentioned in Kaylene Johnson's biography of Palin. During Palin's ultimately unsuccessful run for lieutenant governor in 2002, her little campaign staff, which basically consisted of a handful of her friends, tried to figure out some cheap way to get their message out there:
Patrick ran off business-card size copies of Sarah's picture with a short campaign message on the back. "We were so low budget. Since she's so attractive, I thought we should use our assets. Everyone wanted her picture."
I think a lot of the photos in this calendar were taken by Patrick at that time and perhaps also during the 2006 race.
But perhaps you don't understand these things. People are so terribly dumbed down. They know nothing of history.
I’ll hand it to you. You are remarkedly consistent in your talking point that we should move on. So I vow to be as equally persistant in telling you “NO”.
Spread that reponse to your friends. I’ll support Sarah so long as she supports conservative positions. I don’t foresee that changing anytime soon nor do I see conservatives following you off that damn cliff anytime soon by deserting her.
People that don't know the difference will call anyone a “Populist”. Thatcher was no “Populist”. If you like a "Populist" that's your problem. I'm just pointing out what Sarah Palin is.
“But perhaps you don't understand these things. People are so terribly dumbed down. They know nothing of history. “
Why is it the people like yourself are so unoriginal? You quote me about people like yourself - “dumbed down” and proud of it. This house hold knows unrewritten history.
“I’ll hand it to you. You are remarkedly consistent in your talking point that we should move on. So I vow to be as equally persistant in telling you “NO”.”
Fine. Make Sarah Palin your new religion.
“Spread that reponse to your friends. I’ll support Sarah so long as she supports conservative positions. I don’t foresee that changing anytime soon nor do I see conservatives following you off that damn cliff anytime soon by deserting her.”
My conservative friends could care less on your addiction to Sarah Palin. They don’t care that you don’t like the truth about Sarah Palin. You maybe as stubborn as you like in defending Sarah Palin. Conservatives won’t be supporting her. Support Populism. We truly don’t care.
I'll bet she catches pike too!
Cool!
If you want to order one from Amazon.com, here’s the link to click :
I don’t think too many people would buy it, not even Bill.
I just saw a news item on FOX about the calendar, and they also mentioned she’s right behind Clinton and ahead of 0prah.
There is a rumor that Gov. Palin may be on the Alaska float in the Rose Bowl Parade.
“There is a rumor that Gov. Palin may be on the Alaska float in the Rose Bowl Parade.”
If true, I’ll be watching for probably the 2nd or 3rd time in my 38 years of life!!
She’s pro-gun and pro-life. I vote based on those facts. I’ve yet to find anyone who thinks like me other then me with respect to other issues, so she’s fine with me.
As I understand it, Palin is a strict constructionist. The Alaska constitution states specifically that Alaska’s minerals and natural resources are owned by the people of Alaska; therefore, earnings from those resources do belong to the people under their constitution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.