Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/27/2008 8:27:26 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Is it a fact I gather that Attorney General Moonbeam is making sure the law is not enforce on those radical gays involved in violent stunts and systematic harrassment of Prop. 8 donors?


2 posted on 12/27/2008 8:29:37 PM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

This Looney (”Moonbeam”) dreams of becoming Governor of California once again. We must ensure he does not realize his dream.

Wondering what we are going to have to run against him.


3 posted on 12/27/2008 8:40:32 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, Call 'em what you will, they ALL have Fairies livin' in their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
I submit I've never heard a state Attorney General declare a constitution unconstitutional before - or that the people of a state are not allowed to amend their fundamental law if it goes against the elite's wishes. For advancing a crackpot theory, California's Attorney General Jerry Brown reached a new low in gross turpitude. Can he seriously argue that California's state constitution is now unconstitutional because the voters added a provision with which he disagrees? Apparently, yes! Which is a shame, since the Attorney General is obligated to defend the laws, irrespective of his personal position on them and here Brown felt it more important to pay his political IOUs to the radical gay lobby than to defend the will of California's voters before the state Supreme Court. That says it all.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

6 posted on 12/27/2008 8:53:46 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Nothing new. The Davis Administration betrayed the Prop 187 voters in a similar manner.

It was argued that Brown did not meet the qualifications for Attorney General. To wit, some pointed out "that a person is not qualified to serve as state Attorney General 'unless he shall have been admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the state for a period of at least five years immediately preceding his election or appointment to such office.'"

I don't remember his law license being suspended but Jerry Brown had only been so qualified for about three years because of it, some argued.

But hey! Today rules don't matter none.

Jerry Helmsley Brown says: "We don't follow rules. Only the little people have to follow rules."

(Leona "Queen of Mean" Helmsley boasted "We don't pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes" according to testimony from disgruntled employees who said she terrorized the help at her homes and hotels. Mrs. Helmsley denied saying it. Regardless she went to prison for tax fraud.)

7 posted on 12/27/2008 8:56:56 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Propositions are reviewed to see if they pass Constitutional muster before they ever even get on a ballot. Brown is grasping at straws.
12 posted on 12/27/2008 9:30:33 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

But, but, they WANT it!!!


15 posted on 12/28/2008 5:43:56 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Problem id'd, opinion keyed in...now, what will you DO about it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
I've said it before, but I know someone has some dirt on Brown. He's being extorted.
16 posted on 12/28/2008 7:38:26 AM PST by fwdude ("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"Moonbeam" loved the idea of prop 8 because he thought it would loose.

Now, the voters have changed the constitution, so the only thing left is to have the CASC throw it out, from whence there is no appeal except to the US Supreme court, who will not touch it.

The voters decided they did not want to allow marriage to be perverted. When it does happen, we'll have to pretext any marriage with "he gay-married his friend's brother" or "she straight-married her friend's brother." Can't you feel the love?

20 posted on 12/28/2008 9:50:08 AM PST by HondaCRF450
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
“The amendment process cannot be used to extinguish fundamental constitutional rights without compelling justification.”
And this statment is found where in the constitution?
22 posted on 12/28/2008 6:36:12 PM PST by dbz77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson